An official website of the United States government
A small area typically refers to a subpopulation or domain of interest for which a reliable direct estimate, based only on the domain-specific sample, cannot be produced due to small sample size in the domain. While traditional small area methods and models are widely used nowadays, there have also been much work and interest in robust statistical inference for small area estimation (SAE). We survey this work and provide a comprehensive review here. We begin with a brief review of the traditional SAE methods. We then discuss SAE methods that are developed under weaker assumptions and SAE methods that are robust in certain ways, such as in terms of outliers or model failure. Our discussion also includes topics such as nonparametric SAE methods, Bayesian approaches, model selection and diagnostics, and missing data. A brief review of software packages available for implementing robust SAE methods is also given.
more »
« less
Conjugate Modeling Approaches for Small Area Estimation with Heteroscedastic Structure
Abstract Small area estimation (SAE) has become an important tool in official statistics, used to construct estimates of population quantities for domains with small sample sizes. Typical area-level models function as a type of heteroscedastic regression, where the variance for each domain is assumed to be known and plugged in following a design-based estimate. Recent work has considered hierarchical models for the variance, where the design-based estimates are used as an additional data point to model the latent true variance in each domain. These hierarchical models may incorporate covariate information but can be difficult to sample from in high-dimensional settings. Utilizing recent distribution theory, we explore a class of Bayesian hierarchical models for SAE that smooth both the design-based estimate of the mean and the variance. In addition, we develop a class of unit-level models for heteroscedastic Gaussian response data. Importantly, we incorporate both covariate information as well as spatial dependence, while retaining a conjugate model structure that allows for efficient sampling. We illustrate our methodology through an empirical simulation study as well as an application using data from the American Community Survey.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10483993
- Publisher / Repository:
- Oxford University Press
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology
- ISSN:
- 2325-0984
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
A small area typically refers to a subpopulation or domain of interest for which a reliable direct estimate, based only on the domain-specific sample, cannot be produced due to small sample size in the domain. While traditional small area methods and models are widely used nowadays, there have also been much work and interest in robust statistical inference for small area estimation (SAE). We survey this work and provide a comprehensive review here.We begin with a brief review of the traditional SAE methods. We then discuss SAEmethods that are developed under weaker assumptions and SAE methods that are robust in certain ways, such as in terms of outliers or model failure. Our discussion also includes topics such as nonparametric SAE methods, Bayesian approaches, model selection and diagnostics, and missing data. A brief review of software packages available for implementing robust SAE methods is also given.more » « less
-
Abstract Reliable estimation of child trafficking prevalence at fine geographic scales is critical for targeted program and policy interventions, yet such estimation is often hindered by sparse or incomplete data. This study investigated the use of small area estimation (SAE) methods—one frequentist and the other hierarchical Bayesian—to improve prevalence estimates using data from a household survey of 3070 households across three hotspot districts in Sierra Leone. SAE models were implemented at the chiefdom level (m = 40), the lowest administrative unit, and compared against traditional district-level estimates. Both SAE approaches yielded chiefdom-specific prevalence estimates and predictive probabilities that exhibit substantial heterogeneity and greater precision than the district-level estimates. By borrowing strength across small areas, SAE methods achieved notable reductions in variance and enhanced inference for rare and sensitive outcomes. These findings underscore the utility of SAE for producing reliable local-level estimates in contexts where direct estimation for small geographic areas is infeasible or insufficient. The study highlights the methodological and practical implications of SAE to inform localized interventions and encourages its broader application in research on hidden or hard-to-reach populations, including those affected by crime victimization and human rights violations.more » « less
-
National Forest Inventory (NFI) data are typically limited to sparse networks of sample locations due to cost constraints. While design-based estimators provide reliable forest parameter estimates for large areas, there is increasing interest in model-based small area estimation (SAE) methods to improve precision for smaller spatial, temporal, or biophysical domains. SAE methods can be broadly categorized into area- and unit-level models, with unit-level models offering greater flexibility, making them the focus of this study. Ensuring valid inference requires satisfying model distributional assumptions, which is particularly challenging for NFI variables that exhibit positive support and zero-inflation, such as forest biomass, carbon, and volume. Here, we evaluate nine candidate estimators, including two-stage unit-level hierarchical Bayesian models, single-stage Bayesian models, and two-stage frequentist models, for estimating forest biomass at the county level in Nevada and Washington, United States. Estimator performance is assessed using repeated sampling from simulated populations and unit-level cross-validation with FIA data. Results show that small area estimators incorporating a two-stage approach to account for zero-inflation, county-specific random intercepts and residual variances, and spatial random effects yield the most accurate and well-calibrated county-level estimates, with spatial effects providing the greatest benefits when spatial autocorrelation is present in the underlying population.more » « less
-
Optimal designs minimize the number of experimental runs (samples) needed to accurately estimate model parameters, resulting in algorithms that, for instance, efficiently minimize parameter estimate variance. Governed by knowledge of past observations, adaptive approaches adjust sampling constraints online as model parameter estimates are refined, continually maximizing expected information gained or variance reduced. We apply adaptive Bayesian inference to estimate transition rates of Markov chains, a common class of models for stochastic processes in nature. Unlike most previous studies, our sequential Bayesian optimal design is updated with each observation and can be simply extended beyond two-state models to birth–death processes and multistate models. By iteratively finding the best time to obtain each sample, our adaptive algorithm maximally reduces variance, resulting in lower overall error in ground truth parameter estimates across a wide range of Markov chain parameterizations and conformations.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smad002
