Electromagnetic Ion Cyclotron (EMIC) wave scattering has been proved to be responsible for the fast loss of both radiation belt (RB) electrons and ring current (RC) protons. However, its role in the concurrent dropout of these two co‐located populations remains to be quantified. In this work, we study the effect of EMIC wave scattering on both populations during the 27 February 2014 storm by employing the global physics‐based RAM‐SCB model. Throughout this storm event, MeV RB electrons and 100s keV RC protons experienced simultaneous dropout following the occurrence of intense EMIC waves. By implementing data‐driven initial and boundary conditions, we perform simulations for both populations through the interplay with EMIC waves and compare them against Van Allen Probes observations. The results indicate that by including EMIC wave scattering loss, especially by the He‐band EMIC waves, the model aligns closely with data for both populations. Additionally, we investigate the simulated pitch angle distributions (PADs) for both populations. Including EMIC wave scattering in our model predicts a 90° peaked PAD for electrons with stronger losses at lower pitch angles, while protons exhibit an isotropic PAD with enhanced losses at pitch angles above 40°. Furthermore, our model predicts considerable precipitation of both particle populations, predominantly confined to the afternoon to midnight sector (12 hr < MLT < 24 hr) during the storm's main phase, corresponding closely with the presence of EMIC waves.
Magnetopause shadowing (MPS) effect could drive a concurrent dropout of radiation belt electrons and ring current protons. However, its relative role in the dropout of both plasma populations has not been well quantified. In this work, we study the simultaneous dropout of MeV electrons and 100s keV protons during an intense geomagnetic storm in May 2017. A radial diffusion model with an event‐specific last closed drift shell is used to simulate the MPS loss of both populations. The model well captures the fast shadowing loss of both populations at
- PAR ID:
- 10487038
- Publisher / Repository:
- DOI PREFIX: 10.1029
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Volume:
- 51
- Issue:
- 2
- ISSN:
- 0094-8276
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
Abstract -
more » « less
Abstract To investigate the role of atmospheric collisions and cosmic ray albedo neutron decay (CRAND) in the dynamics of energetic electrons in the Earth's inner radiation belt during geomagnetic quiet times, a drift‐collision‐source model that includes azimuthal drift, pitch angle diffusion from elastic collision, energy loss from inelastic collision, and a CRAND source is developed. In the model, the bounce‐averaged pitch angle diffusion coefficients and energy loss rates are calculated based on scattering of electrons with neutrals given by the NRLMSISE‐00 model and with ions and electrons given by International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) 2012 model. The electron source rate from CRAND follows the recently developed drift‐source model in Xiang et al. (2019). For 304‐keV quasi‐trapped electrons at
L = 1.25, simulation results with CRAND show good agreement with Detection of Electro‐Magnetic Emissions Transmitted from Earthquake Regions satellite observations, confirming that CRAND is the main source for these quasi‐trapped electrons, in contrast to the previous understanding that these quasi‐trapped electrons were formed by wide‐angle scattering of the trapped populations. For trapped electrons, 153, 304, and 509 keV atL < 1.3, the simulation results with only azimuthal drift and atmospheric collisions show a much quicker decrease than observations, while simulation results including a CRAND source are generally comparable to the observations, suggesting that CRAND is an important source of trapped hundreds of kiloelectron‐volt electrons atL < 1.3 during quiet times and provides a baseline for the electron flux even during active times as well. Furthermore, these results suggest that actual radial diffusion rates in the inner belt are lower than previous estimates in which CRAND contributions were not considered. -
more » « less
Abstract Last closed drift shell (LCDS) has been identified as a crucial parameter for investigating the magnetopause shadowing loss of radiation belt electrons. However, drift orbit bifurcation (DOB) effects have not been physically incorporated into the LCDS calculation. Here we calculate event‐specific LCDS using different approaches to dealing with the DOB effects, that is, tracing field lines ignoring DOB, tracing test particles rejecting field lines with DOB, and tracing particles including field lines with DOB, and then incorporate them into a radial diffusion model to simulate the fast electron dropout observed by Van Allen Probes in May 2017. The model effectively captures the fast dropout at high
L* and exhibits the best agreement with data when LCDS is calculated by tracing test particles with DOB more physically included. This study represents the first quantitative modeling of the DOB effects on radiation belt magnetopause shadowing loss via a more physical specification of LCDS. -
more » « less
Abstract During active geomagnetic periods both electrons and protons in the outer radiation belt have been frequently observed to penetrate to low
L (<4). Previous studies have demonstrated systematic differences in the deep penetration of the two species of particles, most notably that the penetration of protons is observed less frequently than for electrons of the same energies. A recent study by Mei et al. (2023,https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL101921 ) showed that the time‐varying convection electric field contributes to the deeper penetration of low‐energy electrons and that a radial diffusion‐convection model can be used to reproduce the storm‐time penetration of lower‐energy electrons to lowerL . In this study, we analyze and provide physical explanations for the different behaviors of electrons and protons in terms of their penetration depth to lowL . A radial diffusion‐convection model is applied for the two species with coefficients that are adjusted according to the mass‐dependent relativistic effects on electron and proton drift velocity, and the different loss mechanisms included for each species. Electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) wave scattering losses for 100s of keV protons during a specific event are modeled and quantified; the results suggest that EMIC waves interacting with protons of lower energies than electrons can contribute to prevent the inward transport of the protons. -
more » « less
Abstract We evaluate energetic electron scattering in pitch angle and energy using realistic magnetic field and density models due to whistler mode chorus waves in Jupiter's magnetosphere and study their dependences on various wave and background parameters. We calculate the bounce‐averaged diffusion coefficients by considering the latitudinal variation of total electron density and ambient magnetic field intensity, using the VIP4 internal magnetic field and CAN current sheet model. The electron phase space density evolution due to chorus waves is simulated at
M shell of 10, using the central wave frequency at0.1 and wave amplitude of 30 pT. Under the typical values of the ratio between the plasma frequency and electron cyclotron frequency, chorus waves could cause fast pitch angle scattering loss of energetic electrons from tens to several hundred keV in several hours, and gradual acceleration of relativistic electrons at several MeV in several days. The electron pitch angle scattering at ~500 keV and the acceleration at several MeV are both enhanced using the latitudinally varying density and VIP4 + CAN magnetic field model compared to the electron evolution using the constant density and dipole magnetic field model. Our sensitivity study indicates that the electron scattering at higher energy is caused by waves at lower frequencies or in a lower‐density background plasma, and the scattering is faster for waves at smaller wave normal angles. The electron diffusion is mainly caused by waves at lower latitudes, but the waves at higher latitudes (>30°) contribute to the electron loss at higher energies (>2 MeV).f ce
