During active geomagnetic periods both electrons and protons in the outer radiation belt have been frequently observed to penetrate to low
Deep penetration of outer radiation belt electrons to low
- PAR ID:
- 10498530
- Publisher / Repository:
- AGU
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Volume:
- 50
- Issue:
- 10
- ISSN:
- 0094-8276
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
Abstract L (<4). Previous studies have demonstrated systematic differences in the deep penetration of the two species of particles, most notably that the penetration of protons is observed less frequently than for electrons of the same energies. A recent study by Mei et al. (2023,https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL101921 ) showed that the time‐varying convection electric field contributes to the deeper penetration of low‐energy electrons and that a radial diffusion‐convection model can be used to reproduce the storm‐time penetration of lower‐energy electrons to lowerL . In this study, we analyze and provide physical explanations for the different behaviors of electrons and protons in terms of their penetration depth to lowL . A radial diffusion‐convection model is applied for the two species with coefficients that are adjusted according to the mass‐dependent relativistic effects on electron and proton drift velocity, and the different loss mechanisms included for each species. Electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) wave scattering losses for 100s of keV protons during a specific event are modeled and quantified; the results suggest that EMIC waves interacting with protons of lower energies than electrons can contribute to prevent the inward transport of the protons. -
Abstract Deep penetration of energetic electrons (10s–100s of keV) to low
L ‐shells (L < 4), as an important source of inner belt electrons, is commonly observed during geomagnetically active times. However, such deep penetration is not observed as frequently for similar energy protons, for which underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. To study their differential deep penetration, we conducted a statistical analysis using phase space densities (PSDs) ofµ = 10–50 MeV/G,K = 0.14 G1/2Re electrons and protons from multiyear Van Allen Probes observations. The results suggest systematic differences in electron and proton deep penetration: electron PSD enhancements at lowL ‐shells occur more frequently, deeply, and faster than protons. Forµ = 10–50 MeV/G electrons, the occurrence rate of deep penetration events (defined as daily‐averaged PSD enhanced by at least a factor of 2 within a day atL < 4) is ∼2–3 events/month. For protons, only ∼1 event/month was observed forµ = 10 MeV/G, and much fewer events were identified forµ > 20 MeV/G. Leveraging dual‐Probe configurations, fast electron deep penetrations atL < 4 are revealed: ∼70% of electron deep penetration events occurred within ∼9 hr; ∼8%–13% occurred even within 3 hr, with lower‐µ electrons penetrating faster than higher‐µ electrons. These results suggest nondiffusive radial transport as the main mechanism of electron deep penetrations. In comparison, proton deep penetration happens at a slower pace. Statistics also show that the electron PSD radial gradient is much steeper than protons prior to deep penetration events, which can be responsible for these differential behaviors of electron and proton deep penetrations. -
Abstract Energetic electron flux enhancements for 100s keV energies are often observed at low
L shells (L < 4) in the inner magnetosphere during geomagnetic storms. However, protons with similar energies do not penetrate as deeply as electrons. Electric fields from subauroral polarization streams (SAPS) have been proposed as a mechanism to explain the difference between the 100s keV electron and proton behavior by altering the particles’ drift paths and allowing electrons to access lowerL shells than protons. Although the primary signature of SAPS is a strong radial electric field, there are corresponding westward/eastward azimuthal electric fields on the eastern/western regions of the SAPS that cause inward/outward radial transport and a differential response between the oppositely drifting electrons and protons. We examine three events where SAPS were observed by the Van Allen Probes near the same time andL shell range as 100s keV electron enhancements deep within the inner magnetosphere. The observations demonstrate that 100s keV electrons were progressively transported radially inward and trapped at lowL shells that were consistent with the spatial extent of the SAPS electric fields. Proton flux enhancements were limited to <100 keV energies and were only observed temporarily in the SAPS region, indicating that these particles were on open drift paths. The particle observations are consistent with the differential drift paths for electrons and protons predicted by a simple SAPS electric field model, suggesting that SAPS play an important role in 100s keV particle dynamics at lowL shells in the inner magnetosphere. -
Abstract To investigate the role of atmospheric collisions and cosmic ray albedo neutron decay (CRAND) in the dynamics of energetic electrons in the Earth's inner radiation belt during geomagnetic quiet times, a drift‐collision‐source model that includes azimuthal drift, pitch angle diffusion from elastic collision, energy loss from inelastic collision, and a CRAND source is developed. In the model, the bounce‐averaged pitch angle diffusion coefficients and energy loss rates are calculated based on scattering of electrons with neutrals given by the NRLMSISE‐00 model and with ions and electrons given by International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) 2012 model. The electron source rate from CRAND follows the recently developed drift‐source model in Xiang et al. (2019). For 304‐keV quasi‐trapped electrons at
L = 1.25, simulation results with CRAND show good agreement with Detection of Electro‐Magnetic Emissions Transmitted from Earthquake Regions satellite observations, confirming that CRAND is the main source for these quasi‐trapped electrons, in contrast to the previous understanding that these quasi‐trapped electrons were formed by wide‐angle scattering of the trapped populations. For trapped electrons, 153, 304, and 509 keV atL < 1.3, the simulation results with only azimuthal drift and atmospheric collisions show a much quicker decrease than observations, while simulation results including a CRAND source are generally comparable to the observations, suggesting that CRAND is an important source of trapped hundreds of kiloelectron‐volt electrons atL < 1.3 during quiet times and provides a baseline for the electron flux even during active times as well. Furthermore, these results suggest that actual radial diffusion rates in the inner belt are lower than previous estimates in which CRAND contributions were not considered. -
Abstract Angular response functions are derived for four electron channels and six proton channels of the SEM‐2 MEPED particle telescopes on the POES and MetOp satellites from Geant4 simulations previously used to derive the energy response. They are combined with model electron distributions in energy and pitch angle to show that the vertical 0° telescope, intended to measure precipitating electrons, instead usually measures trapped or quasi‐trapped electrons, except during times of enhanced pitch angle diffusion. A simplified dynamical model of the radiation belt electron distribution near the loss cone, as a function of longitude, energy, and pitch angle, that accounts for pitch angle diffusion, azimuthal drift, and atmospheric backscatter is fit to sample MEPED electron data at
during times of differing diffusion rates. It is then used to compute precipitating electron flux, as function of energy and longitude, that is lower than would be estimated by assuming that the 0° telescope always measures precipitating electrons.L = 4