skip to main content


This content will become publicly available on February 22, 2025

Title: A new process-based and scale-aware desert dust emission scheme for global climate models – Part II: Evaluation in the Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2)

Abstract. Desert dust is an important atmospheric aerosol that affects the Earth's climate, biogeochemistry, and air quality. However, current Earth system models (ESMs) struggle to accurately capture the impact of dust on the Earth's climate and ecosystems, in part because these models lack several essential aeolian processes that couple dust with climate and land surface processes. In this study, we address this issue by implementing several new parameterizations of aeolian processes detailed in our companion paper in the Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2). These processes include (1) incorporating a simplified soil particle size representation to calculate the dust emission threshold friction velocity, (2) accounting for the drag partition effect of rocks and vegetation in reducing wind stress on erodible soils, (3) accounting for the intermittency of dust emissions due to unresolved turbulent wind fluctuations, and (4) correcting the spatial variability of simulated dust emissions from native to higher spatial resolutions on spatiotemporal dust variability. Our results show that the modified dust emission scheme significantly reduces the model bias against observations compared with the default scheme and improves the correlation against observations of multiple key dust variables such as dust aerosol optical depth (DAOD), surface particulate matter (PM) concentration, and deposition flux. Our scheme's dust also correlates strongly with various meteorological and land surface variables, implying higher sensitivity of dust to future climate change than other schemes' dust. These findings highlight the importance of including additional aeolian processes for improving the performance of ESM aerosol simulations and potentially enhancing model assessments of how dust impacts climate and ecosystem changes.

 
more » « less
Award ID(s):
2151093
NSF-PAR ID:
10502306
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Volume:
24
Issue:
4
ISSN:
1680-7324
Page Range / eLocation ID:
2287 to 2318
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract

    Obtaining reliable estimates of aerodynamic roughness is necessary to interpret and accurately predict aeolian sediment transport dynamics. However, inherent uncertainties in field measurements and models of surface aerodynamic properties continue to undermine aeolian research, monitoring, and dust modeling. A new relation between aerodynamic shelter and land surface shadow has been established at the wind tunnel scale, enabling the potential for estimates of wind erosion and dust emission to be obtained across scales from albedo data. Here, we compare estimates of wind friction velocity (u*) derived from traditional methods (wind speed profiles) with those derived from the albedo model at two separate scales using bare soil patch (via net radiometers) and landscape (via Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer [MODIS] 500 m) data sets. Results show that profile‐derived estimates ofu*are highly variable in anisotropic surface roughness due to changes in wind direction and fetch. Wind speed profiles poorly estimate soil surface (bed) wind friction velocities necessary for aeolian sediment transport research and modeling. Albedo‐based estimates ofu*at both scales have small variability because the estimate is integrated over a defined, fixed area and resolves the partition of wind momentum between roughness elements and the soil surface. We demonstrate that the wind tunnel‐based calibration of albedo for predicting wind friction velocities at the soil surface (us*) is applicable across scales. The albedo‐based approach enables consistent and reliable drag partition correction across scales for model and field estimates ofus*necessary for wind erosion and dust emission modeling.

     
    more » « less
  2. Abstract

    The climate response to atmospheric aerosols, including their effects on dominant modes of climate variability like El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO), remains highly uncertain. This is due to several sources of uncertainty, including aerosol emission, transport, removal, vertical distribution, and radiative properties. Here, we conduct coupled ocean‐atmosphere simulations with two versions of the Community Earth System Model (CESM) driven by semiempirical fine‐mode aerosol direct radiative effects without dust and sea salt. Aerosol atmospheric heating off the west coast of Africa—most of which is due to biomass burning—leads to a significant atmospheric dynamical response, including localized ascent and upper‐level divergence. Coupled Model Intercomparison Project version 6 (CMIP6) biomass burning simulations support this response. Moreover, CESM shows that the anomalous aerosol heating in the Atlantic triggers an atmospheric teleconnection to the tropical Pacific, including strengthening of the Walker circulation. The easterly trade winds accelerate, and through coupled ocean‐atmosphere processes and the Bjerknes feedback, a La Niña‐like response develops. Observations also support a relationship between south African biomass burning emissions and ENSO, with La Niña events preceding strong south African biomass burning in boreal fall. Our simulations suggest a possible two‐way feedback between ENSO and south African biomass burning, with La Niña promoting more biomass burning emissions, which may then strengthen the developing La Niña.

     
    more » « less
  3. null (Ed.)
    Abstract. Even though desert dust is the most abundant aerosol bymass in Earth's atmosphere, atmospheric models struggle to accuratelyrepresent its spatial and temporal distribution. These model errors arepartially caused by fundamental difficulties in simulating dust emission incoarse-resolution models and in accurately representing dust microphysicalproperties. Here we mitigate these problems by developing a new methodologythat yields an improved representation of the global dust cycle. We presentan analytical framework that uses inverse modeling to integrate an ensembleof global model simulations with observational constraints on the dust sizedistribution, extinction efficiency, and regional dust aerosol opticaldepth. We then compare the inverse model results against independentmeasurements of dust surface concentration and deposition flux and find thaterrors are reduced by approximately a factor of 2 relative to currentmodel simulations of the Northern Hemisphere dust cycle. The inverse modelresults show smaller improvements in the less dusty Southern Hemisphere,most likely because both the model simulations and the observationalconstraints used in the inverse model are less accurate. On a global basis,we find that the emission flux of dust with a geometric diameter up to 20 µm (PM20) is approximately 5000 Tg yr−1, which is greater than mostmodels account for. This larger PM20 dust flux is needed to matchobservational constraints showing a large atmospheric loading of coarsedust. We obtain gridded datasets of dust emission, vertically integratedloading, dust aerosol optical depth, (surface) concentration, and wet anddry deposition fluxes that are resolved by season and particle size. As ourresults indicate that this dataset is more accurate than current modelsimulations and the MERRA-2 dust reanalysis product, it can be used toimprove quantifications of dust impacts on the Earth system. 
    more » « less
  4. Abstract

    Long‐range aerosol transport is an important physical mechanism for ecological, biological, and hydrological elements of the earth system. Regarding the latter, regional climate models have no way of assimilating future aerosol concentrations, so dust aerosol emissions must be parameterized using local landscape and meteorological conditions. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of different dust emission settings within the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with chemistry (WRF‐Chem) to facilitate future dynamical downscaling work. This study performs nine WRF‐Chem hindcasts, each utilizing a different dust emission configuration, from 1 March to 31 May 2015, coinciding with a Saharan air layer (SAL) dust outbreak during the 2015 Caribbean drought. WRF‐Chem aerosol optical depth (AOD) and Gálvez‐Davison Index (GDI), a convective forecasting parameter, are validated against analogous MODIS, AERONET, and ERA5 products. In aggregate, the GOCART dust emission scheme with Air Force Weather Agency modifications (GOCART‐AFWA) achieved the best balance between AOD and GDI accuracy when employing the default tuning constant (1.00). As the schemes emitted dust more aggressively, WRF‐Chem produced warming at 500 hPa, reducing GDI over the central and eastern Atlantic near the modeled dust trajectory. Though AOD was generally too low over the southwest Atlantic, the eastern Caribbean occupies a transition zone between negative and positive AOD biases where this field was hindcast with relative accuracy. Meanwhile, areas with positive AOD biases were associated with negative GDI biases (and vice versa) indicating the covariability between SAL dust loadings and thermodynamic conditions in the tropical north Atlantic.

     
    more » « less
  5. We develop a prognostic model of Pollen Emissions for Climate Models (PECM) for use within regional and global climate models to simulate pollen counts over the seasonal cycle based on geography, vegetation type and meteorological parameters. Using modern surface pollen count data, empirical relationships between prior-year annual average temperature and pollen season start dates and end dates are developed for deciduous broadleaf trees (Acer, Alnus, Betula, Fraxinus, Morus, Platanus, Populus, Quercus, Ulmus), evergreen needleleaf trees (Cupressaceae, Pinaceae), grasses (Poaceae; C3, C4), and ragweed (Ambrosia). This regression model explains as much as 57 % of the variance in pollen phenological dates, and it is used to create a climate-flexible phenology that can be used to study the response of wind-driven pollen emissions to climate change. The emissions model is evaluated in a regional climate model (RegCM4) over the continental United States by prescribing an emission potential from PECM and transporting pollen as aerosol tracers. We evaluate two different pollen emissions scenarios in the model: (1) using a taxa-specific land cover database, phenology and emission potential, and (2) a PFT-based land cover, phenology and emission potential. The resulting surface concentrations for both simulations are evaluated against observed surface pollen counts in five climatic subregions. Given prescribed pollen emissions, the RegCM4 simulates observed concentrations within an order of magnitude, although the performance of the simulations in any subregion is strongly related to the land cover representation and the number of observation sites used to create the empirical phenological relationship. The taxa-based model provides a better representation of the phenology of tree-based pollen counts than the PFT-based model, however we note that the PFT-based version provides a useful and climate-flexible emissions model for the general representation of the pollen phenology over the United States. 
    more » « less