An official website of the United States government
Abstract To enhance our understanding of cloud simulations over land, this study provides the first assessment of coupling between cloud and land surface in the Large‐Eddy Simulation (LES) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Symbiotic Simulation and Observation (LASSO) activity for the shallow convection scenario. The analysis of observation data reveals a diurnal cycle of cloud‐land coupling, which co‐varies with surface fluxes. However, coupled (or decoupled) cumulus clouds are inadequately simulated, manifesting as a too‐high (or low) occurrence frequency during the afternoon. This discrepancy is mirrored by the overestimated cloud liquid water path and cloud‐top height. These overestimations are linked to the overpredicted boundary‐layer development and the easier trigger of shallow convection misrepresented in LES runs. Our study underscores the need to improve the representations of boundary‐layer processes and cloud‐land interactions within LES to better simulate shallow clouds in the future.
more »
« less
Observation and Reanalysis Derived Relationships Between Cloud and Land Surface Fluxes Across Cumulus and Stratiform Coupling Over the Southern Great Plains
Abstract Understanding interactions between low clouds and land surface fluxes is critical to comprehending Earth's energy balance, yet their relationships remain elusive, with discrepancies between observations and modeling. Leveraging long‐term field observations over the Southern Great Plains, this investigation revealed that cloud‐land interactions are closely connected to cloud‐land coupling regimes. Observational evidence supports a dual‐mode interaction: coupled stratiform clouds predominate in low sensible heat scenarios, while coupled cumulus clouds dominate in high sensible heat scenarios. Reanalysis data sets, MERRA‐2 and ERA‐5, obscure this dichotomy owing to a shortfall in representing boundary layer clouds, especially in capturing the initiation of coupled cumulus in high sensible heat scenarios. ERA‐5 demonstrates a relatively closer alignment with observational data, particularly in capturing relationships between cloud frequency and latent heat, markedly outperforming MERRA‐2. Our study underscores the necessity of distinguishing different cloud coupling regimes, essential to the understanding of their interactions for advancing land‐atmosphere interactions.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2126098
- PAR ID:
- 10507065
- Publisher / Repository:
- DOI PREFIX: 10.1029
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Volume:
- 51
- Issue:
- 8
- ISSN:
- 0094-8276
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Most climate models in phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) still suffer pronounced warm and dry summer biases in the central United States (CUS), even in high-resolution simulations. We found that the cloud base definition in the cumulus parameterization was the dominant factor determining the spread of the biases among models and those defining cloud base at the lifting condensation level (LCL) performed the best. To identify the underlying mechanisms, we developed a physically based analytical bias model (ABM) to capture the key feedback processes of land–atmosphere coupling. The ABM has significant explanatory power, capturing 80% variance of temperature and precipitation biases among all models. Our ABM analysis via counterfactual experiments indicated that the biases are attributed mostly by surface downwelling longwave radiation errors and second by surface net shortwave radiation errors, with the former 2–5 times larger. The effective radiative forcing from these two errors as weighted by their relative contributions induces runaway temperature and precipitation feedbacks, which collaborate to cause CUS summer warm and dry biases. The LCL cumulus reduces the biases through two key mechanisms: it produces more clouds and less precipitable water, which reduce radiative energy input for both surface heating and evapotranspiration to cause a cooler and wetter soil; it produces more rainfall and wetter soil conditions, which suppress the positive evapotranspiration–precipitation feedback to damp the warm and dry bias coupling. Most models using non-LCL schemes underestimate both precipitation and cloud amounts, which amplify the positive feedback to cause significant biases.more » « less
-
Abstract Two common methods used to develop a process-level understanding of global cloud cover are 1) analyzing large-scale meteorological variables (cloud controlling factors) associated with cloud variability and 2) classifying cloud types using clustering algorithms applied to satellite data, such as the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) weather states. The cloud controlling factor method is advantageous to apply to climate models, as it does not rely on cloud parameterizations or the availability of satellite simulator output. The purpose of this study is to document the relationship between cloud controlling factors and the ISCCP weather states in the observational record, providing a benchmark for the application of cloud controlling factors to study individual cloud types in future studies. Most ISCCP weather states are linked to distinct dynamical regimes characterized by unique combinations of six cloud controlling factors. These relationships are present in both the long-term mean climatology and daily-to-monthly climate variability. For example, deep convective and midlatitude storm clouds dominate ascending regions. In descending regions, shallow cumulus is more frequent in regimes characterized by weak boundary layer temperature inversions [estimated inversion strength (EIS)] and strong subsidence, and stratocumulus is more frequent in regimes with larger values of EIS, weaker subsidence, and relatively weak near-surface cold advection. Midlevel clouds are prominent in descending regions with strong cold advection. Overall, the results of this study suggest promise in using cloud controlling factors to identify dynamical regimes where individual cloud types are more or less likely and to understand the physical processes responsible for the transitions among them.more » « less
-
Abstract. The states of coupling between clouds andsurface or boundary layer have been investigated much more extensively formarine stratocumulus clouds than for continental low clouds, partly due tomore complex thermodynamic structures over land. A manifestation is a lackof robust remote sensing methods to identify coupled and decoupled cloudsover land. Following the idea for determining cloud coupling over the ocean,we have generalized the concept of coupling and decoupling to low cloudsover land, based on potential temperature profiles. Furthermore, by usingample measurements from lidar and a suite of surface meteorologicalinstruments at the U.S. Department of Energy's Atmospheric RadiationMeasurement Program's Southern Great Plains site from 1998 to 2019, we havedeveloped a method to simultaneously retrieve the planetary boundary layer(PBL) height (PBLH) and coupled states under cloudy conditions during thedaytime. The new lidar-based method relies on the PBLH, the liftedcondensation level, and the cloud base to diagnose the cloud coupling. Thecoupled states derived from this method are highly consistent with thosederived from radiosondes. Retrieving the PBLH under cloudy conditions, whichhas been a persistent problem in lidar remote sensing, is resolved in thisstudy. Our method can lead to high-quality retrievals of the PBLH undercloudy conditions and the determination of cloud coupling states. With thenew method, we find that coupled clouds are sensitive to changes in the PBLwith a strong diurnal cycle, whereas decoupled clouds and the PBL are weaklyrelated. Since coupled and decoupled clouds have distinct features, our newmethod offers an advanced tool to separately investigate them in climatesystems.more » « less
-
The influence of the Unified Noah and Noah-MP land surface models (LSMs) on the evolution of cumulus clouds reaching convective initiation (CI) is assessed using infrared brightness temperatures (BT) from GOES-16. Cloud properties from individual cloud objects are examined using output from high-resolution (500 m horizontal grid spacing) model simulations. Cloud objects are tracked over time and related to observed clouds reaching CI to examine differences in cloud extent, longevity, and growth rate. The results demonstrate that differences in assumed surface properties can lead to large discrepancies in the net surface radiative budget, particularly in the sensible and latent heating components where differences exceed 40 W m−2. These differences lead to changes in the local mesoscale circulation patterns that are more pronounced near the edges of forested and grassland boundaries where lower-level convergence is stronger. Higher sensible heating from the Noah-MP LSM produced growth of CI clouds earlier and with increased longevity, which was closer to the timing and growth observed from GOES-16. The increased cloud growth in the Noah-MP experiment results from stronger and deeper updrafts, which lofts more cloud water into the upper levels of the troposphere. The weaker updrafts from the Noah LSM experiment results in shallower convection after CI is detected due to slower growth rates. The differences in cloud properties and growth are directly related to the land surfaces they develop above and point to the importance of accurately representing land properties and radiative characteristics when simulating convection in numerical weather prediction models.more » « less
