skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Vision-Based Ergonomic Risk Assessment of Back-Support Exoskeleton for Construction Workers in Material Handling Tasks
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are a leading cause of injury for workers who are performing physically demanding and repetitive construction tasks. With recent advances in robotics, wearable robots are introduced into the construction industry to mitigate the risk of WMSDs by correcting the workers’ postures and reducing the load exerted on their body joints. While wearable robots promise to reduce the muscular and physical demands on workers to perform tasks, there is a lack of understanding of the impact of wearable robots on worker ergonomics. This lack of understanding may lead to new ergonomic injuries for worker swearing exoskeletons. To bridge this gap, this study aims to assess the workers’ ergonomic risk when using a wearable robot (back-support exoskeleton) in one of the most common construction tasks, material handling. In this research, a vision-based pose estimation algorithm was developed to estimate the pose of the worker while wearing a back-support exoskeleton. As per the estimated pose, joint angles between connected body parts were calculated. Then, the worker’s ergonomic risk was assessed from the calculated angles based on the Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) method. Results showed that using the back-support exoskeleton reduced workers’ ergonomic risk by 31.7% by correcting awkward postures of the trunk and knee during material handling tasks, compared to not using the back-support exoskeleton. The results are expected to facilitate the implementation of wearable robots in the construction industry.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2410255
PAR ID:
10518058
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Publisher / Repository:
American Society of Civil Engineers
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Computing in Civil Engineering 2023
ISBN:
9780784485248
Page Range / eLocation ID:
331 to 339
Format(s):
Medium: X
Location:
Corvallis, Oregon
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; (, Construction Research Congress 2024)
    Exoskeletons, also known as wearable robots, are being studied as a potential solution to reduce the risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) in construction. The exoskeletons can help enhance workers’ postures and provide lift support, reducing the muscular demands on workers while executing construction tasks. Despite the potential of exoskeletons inreducing the risk of WMSDs, there is a lack of understanding about the potential effects ofexoskeletons on workers’ psychological states. This lack of knowledge raises concerns thatexoskeletons may lead to psychological risks, such as cognitive overload, among workers. Tobridge this gap, this study aims to assess the impact of back-support exoskeletons (BSE) onworkers’ cognitive load during material lifting tasks. To accomplish this, a physiologically basedcognitive load assessment framework was developed. This framework used wearable biosensorsto capture the physiological signals of workers and applied Autoencoder and Ensemble Learningtechniques to train a machine learning classifier based on the signals to estimate cognitive loadlevels of workers while wearing the exoskeleton. Results showed that using BSE increasedworkers’ cognitive load by 33% compared to not using it during material handling tasks. Thefindings can aid in the design and implementation of exoskeletons in the construction industry. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; (, CIB Conferences)
    Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) present significant challenges in the construction industry, where workers are at high risk of lower back and other injuries. Exoskeletons (EXOs) offer a promising ergonomic solution, but their adoption in construction remains underexplored, particularly regarding user perceptions, usability, and real-time feedback. This study evaluated the experiences of 16 construction workers who used a prototype passive lower-body EXO during a three-hour trial on active worksites. Feedback was analyzed thematically, revealing critical factors influencing EXO usability, including comfort, fit, tool compatibility, performance, and durability. Participants reported benefits such as reduced lower-back strain and improved posture, but discomfort from straps, heat retention, and sizing issues posed barriers to acceptance. Limited tool accessibility and mobility constraints further highlighted the need for design modifications. Comfort and fit emerged as essential for user acceptance, requiring ergonomic adjustments to suit diverse body types and work tasks. While some discomfort was noted, it did not significantly impact performance during the trial. This study underscores the importance of incorporating user feedback into EXO design to meet the dynamic demands of construction work, contributing to advancements in ergonomic solutions for the industry. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; (, ASC)
    Active back-support exoskeleton has gained recognition as a potential solution to mitigate work- related musculoskeletal disorders. However, their utilization in the construction industry can introduce unintended consequences, such as increased fall hazards. This study examines the implications of using active back-support exoskeleton on fall risk during construction framing tasks, incorporating wearable pressure insoles for data collection. Two experimental conditions were established, one involving the simulation of construction framing tasks with exoskeleton and the other without exoskeleton. These tasks encompassed six subtasks: measuring, assembly, nailing, lifting, moving, and installation. Foot plantar pressure distribution was recorded across various spatial foot regions, including the arch, toe, metatarsal, and heel. Statistical analysis, employing a paired t-test on peak plantar pressure data, revealed that the use of active back-support exoskeleton significantly increased fall risks in at least one of the foot regions for all subtasks, except for the assembly subtask. These findings provide valuable insights for construction stakeholders when making decisions regarding the adoption of active back-support exoskeleton in the industry. Moreover, they inform exoskeleton manufacturers of the need to develop adaptive and customized exoskeleton solutions tailored to the unique demands of construction sites. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; (, Computing in Civil Engineering 2023)
    Active exoskeletons are emerging as ergonomic solutions in the construction sector to reduce work-related musculoskeletal injuries. While the benefits of active exoskeletons are promising, they can also cause increased muscle activity, leading to local muscular fatigue. This study aimed to examine the impact of the active exoskeleton system on the muscular activity of construction workers during common construction activities. Ten subjects completed material handling tasks under two weight conditions (10 and 30 lbs) in a lab-controlled environment, with and without using an active exoskeleton. Portable electromyography (EMG) sensors were used to measure lumbar erector spinae (LES) muscle activity in each condition. Four descriptive statistics features in the time and frequency domains were extracted from the collected signals. Results of the t-test showed a significant difference in the physiological metrics extracted from the subjects’ EMG signals of the LES muscle. Findings demonstrated that using active exoskeletons reduces the internal muscle force in the lower back regions of construction workers. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; (, Journal of Management in Engineering)
    Construction work exposes frontline workers to high rates of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) due to frequent lifting, bending, and overhead tasks. However, due to the dynamic operations and complex nature of construction work, frontline workers remain hesitant to adopt and integrate exoskeleton technology into their work environment. This study investigated the role of short-term pilot trials in influencing frontline workers’ acceptance of exoskeleton technology. A two-phased mixed-methods design was employed, integrating pre- and post-trial surveys with semi-structured interviews. Eighteen construction students participated in controlled laboratory simulations, while sixteen frontline workers completed a three-hour pilot trial on two active construction sites using a passive back-support exoskeleton. Quantitative results revealed significant improvements in perceived performance expectancy from a mean value of 2.43 to 3.52 (p < 0.001), an increase of 1.09, effort expectancy rose from 2.34 to 3.32 (p = 0.0439), an increase of 0.98, and behavioral intention to use exoskeletons rising from 2.38 to 3.65 (p = 0.0003), an increase of 1.27. Qualitative feedback highlighted key barriers, including discomfort from straps, challenges with tool access, and thermal discomfort. These findings demonstrate that short-term pilot exposure enhances technology acceptance and reveals key barriers to adoption. This study provides empirical evidence on how short-term pilots influence exoskeleton adoption among construction workers in both controlled environments and active jobsites. This work integrates real-world field trials into technology acceptance research, thereby bridging a critical gap between intention-based acceptance models and on-site behavioral responses. Future research should explore long-term adoption patterns, test across diverse trades, and evaluate different exoskeleton models under varied conditions. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Text Encoded Conversion
  • XML
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email