An official website of the United States government
It is generally acknowledged that interdependent critical infrastructure in coastal urban areas is constantly threatened by storm-induced flooding. Due to changing climate effects, such as sea level rise (SLR), the occurrence of catastrophic events will be more frequent and may trigger an increased likelihood of severe hazards. Planning a protective measure or mitigation strategy is a complex problem given the constraints that it must fit within a prescribed and limited fiscal budget and be beneficial to the community it protects both socially and economically. This article proposes a methodology for optimizing protective measures and mitigation strategies for interdependent infrastructures subjected to storm-induced flooding and climate change impacts such as SLR. Optimality is defined in this methodology as a maximum reduction in overall expected losses within a prescribed budget (compared to the expected losses in the case of doing nothing for protection/mitigation). Protective measures can include seawalls, barriers, artificial dunes, restoration of wetlands, raising individual buildings, sealing parts of the infrastructure, strategic retreat, insurance, and many more. The optimal protective strategy can be a combination of several protective measures implemented over space and time. The optimization process starts with parameterizing the protective measures. Storm-induced flooding and SLR, and their corresponding consequences, are estimated using a GIS-based subdivision-redistribution methodology (GISSR) developed by the authors for finding a rough solution in the first brute-force iterations of the optimization loop. A storm surge computational model called GeoClaw is subsequently used to simulate ensembles of synthetic storms in order to fine-tune and achieve the optimal solution. Damage loss, including economic impacts, is quantified based on calculated flood estimates. The suitability of the potential optimal solution is examined and assessed with input from stakeholders' interviews. It should be mentioned that the results and conclusions provided in this work depend on the assumptions made about future sea level rise (SLR). The authors acknowledge that there are other, more severe predictions for sea level rise (SLR), than the one used in this paper.
more »
« less
Optimal Selection of Short- and Long-Term Mitigation Strategies for Buildings within Communities under Flooding Hazard
Every year, floods cause substantial economic losses worldwide with devastating impacts on buildings and physical infrastructures throughout communities. Techniques are available to mitigate flood damage and subsequent losses, but the ability to weigh such strategies with respect to their benefits from a community resilience perspective is limited in the literature. Investing in flood mitigation is critical for communities to protect the physical and socioeconomic systems that depend on them. While there are multiple mitigation options to implement at the building level, this paper focuses on determining the optimal flood mitigation strategy for buildings to minimize flood losses within a community. In this research, a mixed integer linear programming model is proposed for studying the effects and trade-offs associated with pre-event short-term and long-term mitigation strategies to minimize the expected economic losses associated with floods. The capabilities of the proposed model are illustrated for Lumberton, North Carolina (NC), a small, socially diverse inland community on the Lumber River. The mathematically optimal building-level flood mitigation plan is provided based on the available budget, which can significantly minimize the total expected direct economic loss of the community. The results reveal important correlations among investment quantity, building-level short- and long-term mitigation measures, flood depths of various locations, and buildings’ structure. Additionally, this study shows the trade-offs between short- and long-term mitigation measures based on available budget by providing decision support to building owners regarding mitigation measures for their buildings.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2052930
- PAR ID:
- 10520358
- Publisher / Repository:
- MDPI
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Sustainability
- Volume:
- 14
- Issue:
- 16
- ISSN:
- 2071-1050
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 9812
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract As the global impact of climate change intensifies, there is an urgent need for equitable and efficient climate adaptation policies. Traditional approaches for allocating public resources for climate adaptation that are based on economic benefit-cost analysis often overlook the resulting distributional inequalities. In this study, we apply equity weightings to mitigate the distributional inequalities in two key building and household level adaptation strategies under changing coastal flood hazards: property buyouts and building retrofit in New York City (NYC). Under a mid-range emissions scenario, we find that unweighted benefit cost ratios applied to residential buildings are higher for richer and non-disadvantaged census tracts in NYC. The integration of income-based equity weights alters this correlation effect, which has the potential to shift investment in mitigation towards poorer and disadvantaged census tracts. This alteration is sensitive to the value of elasticity of marginal utility, the key parameter used to calculate the equity weight. Higher values of elasticity of marginal utility increase benefits for disadvantaged communities but reduce the overall economic benefits from investments, highlighting the trade-offs in incorporating equity into adaptation planning.more » « less
-
During flash flooding, quick and effective rescue operations are crucial to minimizing harm to vulnerable communities. While much research focused on emergency response and evacuation, few studies address how overhead powerline obstructions impact rescue operations. Additionally, existing research on vulnerable communities often emphasizes long-term flood mitigation and recovery but less so on immediate responses. To ensure rapid and equitable flood rescue operations, this study derives an integrated metric to quantify rescue demands that incorporate rescue efficiency, community flood severity, and social vulnerability. In detail, rescue efficiency is calculated by analyzing a network that captures the geospatial interdependencies between the residential buildings' road networks and overhead power lines; community flood severity is quantified as the percentage of building damage resulting from flood impacts; and social vulnerability is an integrated indication of key household composition factors (e.g., elders, single parents, and minorities). Based on this metric, a systematic step is designed to suggest the sequence of rescue operations and the strategies for distributing rescue lifeboats at emergency facilities. The applicability and feasibility of the proposed approach were demonstrated using lifeboat rescue operations in Manville, New Jersey, during Hurricane Ida. This study calculates dynamic changes in rescue loads of all emergency facilities and then finds the optimal strategies for distributing lifeboats. The results highlight the significant impact of overhead power line obstructions on the optimal rescue lifeboat distribution. Additionally, the results suggest prioritizing emergency evacuation for socially vulnerable households in Manville township. Practically, the generated rescue sequence and rescue lifeboat distribution are expected to help emergency response agencies perform effective and rapid rescue operations.more » « less
-
Abstract Coastal communities are increasingly vulnerable to hurricanes, which cause billions of dollars in damage annually through wind, storm surge, and flooding. Mitigation efforts are essential to reduce these impacts but face significant challenges, including uncertainties in hazard prediction, damage estimation, and recovery costs. Resource constraints and the disproportionate burden borne by socioeconomically vulnerable groups further complicate retrofitting strategies. This study presents a probabilistic methodology to assess and mitigate hurricane risks by integrating hazard analysis, building fragility, and economic loss assessment. The methodology prioritizes retrofitting strategies using a risk‐informed, equity‐focused approach. Multi‐objective optimization balances cost‐effectiveness and risk reduction while promoting fair resource allocation among socioeconomic groups. The novelty of this study lies in its direct integration of equity as an objective in resource allocation through multi‐objective optimization, its comprehensive consideration of multi‐hazard risks, its inclusion of both direct and indirect losses in cost assessments, and its use of probabilistic hazard analysis to incorporate varying time horizons. A case study of the Galveston testbed demonstrates the methodology's potential to minimize damage and foster equitable resilience. Analysis of budget scenarios and trade‐offs between cost and equity underscores the importance of comprehensive loss assessments and equity considerations in mitigation and resilience planning. Key findings highlight the varied effectiveness of retrofitting strategies across different budgets and time horizons, the necessity of addressing both direct and indirect losses, and the importance of multi‐hazard considerations for accurate risk assessments. Multi‐objective optimization underscores that equitable solutions are achievable even under constrained budgets. Beyond a certain point, achieving equity does not necessarily increase expected losses, demonstrating that more equitable solutions can be implemented without compromising overall cost‐effectiveness.more » « less
-
Abstract The growing number of flood events in urban areas is causing far‐reaching economic losses and social disruptions. To implement suitable flood risk management strategies and measures for flood prevention and mitigation, it is paramount to adequately assess economy‐wide losses associated with potential flood events. The assessment of potential flood damage in the USA relies significantly on the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Hazus Flood Model. A primary requirement to reduce uncertainty is to empirically gather user input data. Consequently, there is a need to integrate publicly accessible business data for accurate evaluation of losses in business activities. We present a novel approach for estimating both the direct losses in business activities during a flood and the total economy‐wide impact that arise from these disruptions. First, we integrate the FEMA Hazus Flood Model with Reference Solutions business‐level data to estimate the reduction in business activities (i.e., direct losses) following a 100‐year flood event in New Hanover County, North Carolina. Second, we estimate the broader economy‐wide impact these business activity losses have on total industry output, employment, value‐added and household income using a regional computational general equilibrium model. The advantage of our approach is the easy replicability of the business loss estimation process for US cities and regions of interest, which, when used in a follow‐up economic impact study, leads to estimating the total economy‐wide losses in economic activities. Policy makers relying solely on direct physical and economic damages would, by ignoring indirect losses, underestimate the benefits of investing in flood mitigation and protection.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169812
