More Like this

1. Dissociable influences of reward and punishment on adaptive cognitive control

   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009737  

   Leng, Xiamin; Yee, Debbie; Ritz, Harrison; Shenhav, Amitai (December 2021, PLOS Computational Biology)

   Ahn, Woo-Young (Ed.)

   To invest effort into any cognitive task, people must be sufficiently motivated. Whereas prior research has focused primarily on how the cognitive control required to complete these tasks is motivated by the potential rewards for success, it is also known that control investment can be equally motivated by the potential negative consequence for failure. Previous theoretical and experimental work has yet to examine how positive and negative incentives differentially influence the manner and intensity with which people allocate control. Here, we develop and test a normative model of control allocation under conditions of varying positive and negative performance incentives. Our model predicts, and our empirical findings confirm, that rewards for success and punishment for failure should differentially influence adjustments to the evidence accumulation rate versus response threshold, respectively. This dissociation further enabled us to infer how motivated a given person was by the consequences of success versus failure. 

   more » « less
2. Do you ever get tired of being wrong? The unique impact of feedback on subjective experiences of effort-based decision-making

   https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5jekt  

   Xu, Anna; Frömer, Romy; Wolff, Wanja; Shenhav, Amitai (December 2023, PsyArXiv)

   To achieve a goal, people have to keep track of how much effort they are putting in (effort monitoring) and how well they are performing (performance monitoring), which can be informed by endogenous signals, or exogenous signals providing explicit feedback about whether they have met their goal. Interventions to improve performance often focus on adjusting feedback to direct the individual on how to better invest their efforts, but is it possible that this feedback itself plays a role in shaping the experience of how effortful the task feels? Here, we examine this question directly by assessing the relationship between effort monitoring and performance monitoring. Participants (N = 68) performed a task in which their goal was to squeeze a handgrip to within a target force level (not lower or higher) for a minimum duration. On most trials, they were given no feedback as to whether they met their goal, and were largely unable to detect how they had performed. On a subset of trials, however, we provided participants with (false) feedback indicating that they had either succeeded or failed at meeting their goal (positive vs. negative feedback blocks, respectively). Sporadically, participants rated their experience of effort exertion, fatigue, and confidence in having met the target grip force on that trial. Despite being non-veridical to their actual performance, we found that the type of feedback participants received influenced their experience of effort. When receiving negative (vs. positive) feedback, participants fatigued faster and adjusted their grip strength more for higher target force levels. We also found that confidence gradually increased with increasing positive feedback and decreased with increasing negative feedback, again despite feedback being uniformly uninformative. These results suggest differential influences of feedback on experiences related to effort and further shed light on the relationship between experiences related to performance monitoring and effort monitoring. 

   more » « less
3. The Roles of Salience and Value in Inattention Among Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Pilot Investigation

   https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.750525  

   Musser, Erica D.; Morris, Stephanie S.; Feeney, Kathleen; Pintos Lobo, Rosario; Ester, Edward F. (November 2021, Frontiers in Psychology)

   Although inattention is a key symptom subdomain of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), the mechanisms underlying this subdomain and related symptoms remain unclear. There is a need for more granular approaches that allow for greater specificity in linking disruptions in specific domains of cognitive performance (e.g., executive function and reward processing) with behavioral manifestations of ADHD. Such approaches may inform the development of more targeted therapeutic interventions. Here, we describe the results of a pilot study of elementary-aged children (ages 6–12years) with ADHD ( n =50) and typically developing children ( n =48) utilizing a cognitive science task designed to target two dissociable mechanisms of attentional selection: a goal-driven mechanism (i.e., reward/value-driven) and a salience-driven mechanism. Participants were asked to optimally extract and combine information about stimulus salience and value to maximize rewards. While results of this pilot study are ambiguous due to the small sample size and limited number of task trials, data suggest that neither participants with ADHD nor typically developing participants performed optimally to maximize rewards, though typically developing participants were somewhat more successful at the task (i.e., more likely to report high-value targets) regardless of task condition. Further, the manuscript examines several follow-up questions regarding group differences in task response times and group differences in task performance as related to sustained attention across the duration of the task. Finally, the manuscript examines follow-up questions related to heterogeneity in the ADHD group (i.e., age, DSM 5 presentation, and comorbid diagnosis) in predicting task performance. 

   more » « less
4. Neuroimaging Signatures of Metacognitive Improvement in Sensorimotor Timing

   https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1789-22.2023  

   Bader, Farah; Wiener, Martin (December 2023, The Journal of Neuroscience)

   Error monitoring is an essential human ability underlying learning and metacognition. In the time domain, humans possess a remarkable ability to learn and adapt to temporal intervals, yet the neural mechanisms underlying this are not well understood. Recently, we demonstrated that humans exhibit improvements in sensorimotor time estimates when given the chance to incorporate feedback from a previous trial (Bader and Wiener, 2021), suggesting that humans are metacognitively aware of their own timing errors. To test the neural basis of this metacognitive ability, human participants of both sexes underwent fMRI while they performed a visual temporal reproduction task with randomized suprasecond intervals (1.5-6s). Crucially, each trial was repeated following feedback, allowing a “re-do” to learn from the successes or errors in the initial trial. Behaviorally, we replicated our previous finding that subjects improve their performance on re-do trials despite the feedback being temporally uninformative (i.e. early or late). For neuroimaging, we observed a dissociation between estimating and reproducing time intervals, with the former more likely to engage regions associated with the default mode network (DMN), including the superior frontal gyri, precuneus, and posterior cingulate, whereas the latter activated regions associated traditionally with the “Timing Network” (TN), including the supplementary motor area (SMA), precentral gyrus, and right supramarginal gyrus. Notably, greater DMN involvement was observed in Re-do trials. Further, the extent of the DMN was greater on re-do trials, whereas for the TN it was more constrained. Finally, Task-based connectivity between these networks demonstrated higher inter-network correlation on initial trials, but primarily when estimating trials, whereas on re-do trials communication was higher during reproduction. Overall, these results suggest the DMN and TN work in concert to mediate subjective awareness of one’s sense of time for the purpose of improving timing performance. Significance StatementA finely tuned sense of time perception is imperative for everyday motor actions (e.g., hitting a baseball). Timing self-regulation requires correct assessment and updating duration estimates if necessary. Using a modified version of a classical task of time measurement, we explored the neural regions involved in error detection, time awareness, and learning to time. Reinforcing the role of the SMA in measuring temporal information and providing evidence of co-activation with the DMN, this study demonstrates that the brain overlays sensorimotor timing with a metacognitive awareness of its passage. 

   more » « less
5. Assessing Workers’ Mental Stress in Hand-over Activities during Human-robot Collaboration

   https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181322661194  

   Lu, Lu; Xie, Ziyang; Wang, Hanwen; Su, Bingyi; Edward P. Fitts, Xu Xu (September 2022, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting)

   Human-robot collaboration (HRC) is an emerging research area that has gained tremendous attention from both academia and industry. Since some robot-related factors can elicit mental stress or have negative psychological effects on human workers, it is essential to understand these factors and maintain workers’ mental stress at a low level. Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) measures skin conductance and is known to be a physiological measurement that reflects short-term mental stress. Typically, skin conductance increases in response to greater mental stress. In this study, the mental stress caused by the hand-over activities of a collaborative robot was investigated using both GSR as an objective measurement and NASA-Task Load Index (TLX) as a subjective assessment. Several robot-related factors that may lead to mental stress were experimentally examined. GSR outcomes indicated that end effector approaching within workers’ view, low end effector speed, and constrained end effector trajectory led to a significantly lower skin conductance. Some aspects of the NASA-TLX also indicated that speed and trajectory significantly affected the scores. Yet, no significant differences were found between approaching directions regarding NASA-TLX scores. 

   more » « less