skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Phase stabilization with motion compensated diffusion weighted imaging
Abstract PurposeDiffusion encoding gradient waveforms can impartintra‐voxelandinter‐voxeldephasing owing to bulk motion, limiting achievable signal‐to‐noise and complicating multishot acquisitions. In this study, we characterize improvements in phase consistency via gradient moment nulling of diffusion encoding waveforms. MethodsHealthy volunteers received neuro () and cardiac () MRI. Three gradient moment nulling levels were evaluated: compensation for position (), position + velocity (), and position + velocity + acceleration (). Three experiments were completed: (Exp‐1) Fixed Trigger Delay Neuro DWI; (Exp‐2) Mixed Trigger Delay Neuro DWI; and (Exp‐3) Fixed Trigger Delay Cardiac DWI. Significant differences () of the temporal phase SD between repeated acquisitions and the spatial phase gradient across a given image were assessed. Resultsmoment nulling was a reference for all measures. In Exp‐1, temporal phase SD for diffusion encoding was significantly reduced with (35% oft‐tests) and (68% oft‐tests). The spatial phase gradient was reduced in 23% oft‐tests for and 2% of cases for . In Exp‐2, temporal phase SD significantly decreased with gradient moment nulling only for (83% oft‐tests), but spatial phase gradient significantly decreased with only (50% oft‐tests). In Exp‐3, gradient moment nulling significantly reduced temporal phase SD and spatial phase gradients (100% oft‐tests), resulting in less signal attenuation and more accurate ADCs. ConclusionWe characterized gradient moment nulling phase consistency for DWI. UsingM1for neuroimaging andM1 + M2for cardiac imaging minimized temporal phase SDs and spatial phase gradients.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2205103
PAR ID:
10536157
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
ISSN:
0740-3194
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; ; (, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine)
    PurposeTo develop and evaluate a cardiac phase‐resolved myocardial T1mapping sequence. MethodsThe proposed method for temporally resolved parametric assessment of Z‐magnetization recovery (TOPAZ) is based on contiguous fast low‐angle shot imaging readout after magnetization inversion from the pulsed steady state. Thereby, segmented k‐space data are acquired over multiple heartbeats, before reaching steady state. This results in sampling of the inversion‐recovery curve for each heart phase at multiple points separated by an R‐R interval. Joint T1andestimation is performed for reconstruction of cardiac phase‐resolved T1andmaps. Sequence parameters are optimized using numerical simulations. Phantom and in vivo imaging are performed to compare the proposed sequence to a spin‐echo reference and saturation pulse prepared heart rate–independent inversion‐recovery (SAPPHIRE) T1mapping sequence in terms of accuracy and precision. ResultsIn phantom, TOPAZ T1values with integratedcorrection are in good agreement with spin‐echo T1values (normalized root mean square error = 4.2%) and consistent across the cardiac cycle (coefficient of variation = 1.4 ± 0.78%) and different heart rates (coefficient of variation = 1.2 ± 1.9%). In vivo imaging shows no significant difference in TOPAZ T1times between the cardiac phases (analysis of variance:P = 0.14, coefficient of variation = 3.2 ± 0.8%), but underestimation compared with SAPPHIRE (T1time ± precision: 1431 ± 56 ms versus 1569 ± 65 ms). In vivo precision is comparable to SAPPHIRE T1mapping until middiastole (P > 0.07), but deteriorates in the later phases. ConclusionsThe proposed sequence allows cardiac phase‐resolved T1mapping with integratedassessment at a temporal resolution of 40 ms. Magn Reson Med 79:2087–2100, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine)
    Abstract PurposeTo improve liver proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and quantification at 0.55 T by systematically validating the acquisition parameter choices and investigating the performance of locally low‐rank denoising methods. MethodsA Monte Carlo simulation was conducted to design a protocol for PDFF and mapping at 0.55 T. Using this proposed protocol, we investigated the performance of robust locally low‐rank (RLLR) and random matrix theory (RMT) denoising. In a reference phantom, we assessed quantification accuracy (concordance correlation coefficient [] vs. reference values) and precision (using SD) across scan repetitions. We performed in vivo liver scans (11 subjects) and used regions of interest to compare means and SDs of PDFF and measurements. Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests were performed (p < 0.05 considered significant). ResultsIn the phantom, RLLR and RMT denoising improved accuracy in PDFF and with >0.992 and improved precision with >67% decrease in SD across 50 scan repetitions versus conventional reconstruction (i.e., no denoising). For in vivo liver scans, the mean PDFF and mean were not significantly different between the three methods (conventional reconstruction; RLLR and RMT denoising). Without denoising, the SDs of PDFF and were 8.80% and 14.17 s−1. RLLR denoising significantly reduced the values to 1.79% and 5.31 s−1(p < 0.001); RMT denoising significantly reduced the values to 2.00% and 4.81 s−1(p < 0.001). ConclusionWe validated an acquisition protocol for improved PDFF and quantification at 0.55 T. Both RLLR and RMT denoising improved the accuracy and precision of PDFF and measurements. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; (, European Heart Journal - Imaging Methods and Practice)
    Abstract AimsAccurate cardiac chamber quantification is essential for clinical decisions and ideally should be consistent across different echocardiography systems. This study evaluates variations between the Philips EPIQ CVx (version 9.0.3) and Canon Aplio i900 (version 7.0) in measuring cardiac volumes, ventricular function, and valve structures. Methods and resultsIn this gender-balanced, single-centre study, 40 healthy volunteers (20 females and 20 males) aged 40 years and older (mean age 56.75 ± 11.57 years) were scanned alternately with both systems by the same sonographer using identical settings for both 2D and 4D acquisitions. We compared left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) volumes using paired t-tests, with significance set at P < 0.05. Correlation and Bland–Altman plots were used for quantities showing significant differences. Two board-certified cardiologists evaluated valve anatomy for each platform. The results showed no significant differences in LV end-systolic volume and LV ejection fraction between platforms. However, LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) differed significantly (biplane: P = 0.018; 4D: P = 0.028). Right ventricular (RV) measurements in 4D showed no significant differences, but there were notable disparities in 2D and 4D volumes within each platform (P < 0.01). Significant differences were also found in the LV systolic dyssynchrony index (P = 0.03), LV longitudinal strain (P = 0.04), LV twist (P = 0.004), and LV torsion (P = 0.005). Valve structure assessments varied, with more abnormalities noted on the Philips platform. ConclusionAlthough LV and RV volumetric measurements are generally comparable, significant differences in LVEDV, LV strain metrics, and 2D vs. 4D measurements exist. These variations should be considered when using different platforms for patient follow-ups. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; (, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine)
    PurposeTo determineR2and transverse relaxation rates in healthy lung parenchyma at 0.55 T. This is important in that it informs the design and optimization of new imaging methods for 0.55T lung MRI. MethodsExperiments were performed in 3 healthy adult volunteers on a prototype whole‐body 0.55T MRI, using a custom free‐breathing electrocardiogram‐triggered, single‐slice echo‐shifted multi‐echo spin echo (ES‐MCSE) pulse sequence with respiratory navigation. Transverse relaxation ratesR2and and off‐resonance ∆fwere jointly estimated using nonlinear least‐squares estimation. These measurements were compared againstR2estimates from T2‐prepared balanced SSFP (T2‐Prep bSSFP) and estimates from multi‐echo gradient echo, which are used widely but prone to error due to different subvoxel weighting. ResultsThe meanR2and values of lung parenchyma obtained from ES‐MCSE were 17.3 ± 0.7 Hz and 127.5 ± 16.4 Hz (T2 = 61.6 ± 1.7 ms;  = 9.5 ms ± 1.6 ms), respectively. The off‐resonance estimates ranged from −60 to 30 Hz. TheR2from T2‐Prep bSSFP was 15.7 ± 1.7 Hz (T2 = 68.6 ± 8.6 ms) and from multi‐echo gradient echo was 131.2 ± 30.4 Hz ( = 8.0 ± 2.5 ms). Paired t‐test indicated that there is a significant difference between the proposed and reference methods (p < 0.05). The meanR2estimate from T2‐Prep bSSFP was slightly smaller than that from ES‐MCSE, whereas the mean and estimates from ES‐MCSE and multi‐echo gradient echo were similar to each other across all subjects. ConclusionsJoint estimation of transverse relaxation rates and off‐resonance is feasible at 0.55 T with a free‐breathing electrocardiogram‐gated and navigator‐gated ES‐MCSE sequence. At 0.55 T, the meanR2of 17.3 Hz is similar to the reported meanR2of 16.7 Hz at 1.5 T, but the mean of 127.5 Hz is about 5–10 times smaller than that reported at 1.5 T. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; (, Journal of Biogeography)
    Abstract AimPatterns of genetic diversity within species’ ranges can reveal important insights into effects of past climate on species’ biogeography and current population dynamics. While numerous biogeographic hypotheses have been proposed to explain patterns of genetic diversity within species’ ranges, formal comparisons and rigorous statistical tests of these hypotheses remain rare. Here, we compared seven hypotheses for their abilities to describe the geographic pattern of two metrics of genetic diversity in balsam poplar (Populus balsamifera), a northern North American tree species. LocationNorth America. TaxonBalsam poplar (Populus balsamiferaL.). MethodsWe compared seven hypotheses, representing effects of past climate and current range position, for their ability to describe the geographic pattern of expected heterozygosity and per cent polymorphic loci across 85 populations of balsam poplar. We tested each hypothesis using spatial and non‐spatial least‐squares regression to assess the importance of spatial autocorrelation on model performance. ResultsWe found that both expected heterozygosity and per cent polymorphic loci could best be explained by the current range position and genetic structure of populations within the contemporary range. Genetic diversity showed a clear gradient of being highest near the geographic and climatic range centre and lowest near range edges. Hypotheses accounting for the effects of past climate (e.g. past climatic suitability, distance from the southern edge), in contrast, had comparatively little support. Model ranks were similar among spatial and non‐spatial models, but residuals of all non‐spatial models were significantly autocorrelated, violating the assumption of independence in least‐squares regression. Main conclusionsOur work adds strong support for the “Central‐Periphery Hypothesis” as providing a predictive framework for understanding the forces structuring genetic diversity across species’ ranges, and illustrates the value of applying a robust comparative model selection framework and accounting for spatial autocorrelation when comparing biogeographic models of genetic diversity. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email