An official website of the United States government
We propose a Bayesian model selection approach for generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs). We consider covariance structures for the random effects that are widely used in areas such as longitudinal studies, genome-wide association studies, and spatial statistics. Since the random effects cannot be integrated out of GLMMs analytically, we approximate the integrated likelihood function using a pseudo likelihood approach. Our Bayesian approach assumes a flat prior for the fixed effects and includes both approximate reference prior and half-Cauchy prior choices for the variances of random effects. Since the flat prior on the fixed effects is improper, we develop a fractional Bayes factor approach to obtain posterior probabilities of the several competing models. Simulation studies with Poisson generalized linear mixed models with spatial random effects and overdispersion random effects show that our approach performs favorably when compared to widely used competing Bayesian methods including DIC and WAIC. We illustrate the usefulness and flexibility of our approach with three case studies including a Poisson longitudinal model, a Poisson spatial model, and a logistic mixed model. Our proposed approach is implemented in the R package GLMMselect that is available on CRAN.
more »
« less
Fixed and random effect selections in generalized linear mixed models
Generalized linear mixed models are commonly used to describe relationships between correlated responses and covariates in medical research. In this paper, we propose a simple and easily implementable regularized estimation approach to select both fixed and random effects in generalized linear mixed model. Specifically, we propose to construct and optimize the objective functions using the confidence distributions of model parameters, as opposed to using the observed data likelihood functions, to perform effect selections. Two estimation methods are developed. The first one is to use the joint confidence distribution of model parameters to perform simultaneous fixed and random effect selections. The second method is to use the marginal confidence distributions of model parameters to perform the selections of fixed and random effects separately. With a proper choice of regularization parameters in the adaptive LASSO framework, we show the consistency and oracle properties of the proposed regularized estimators. Simulation studies have been conducted to assess the performance of the proposed estimators and demonstrate computational efficiency. Our method has also been applied to two longitudinal cancer studies to identify demographic and clinical factors associated with patient health outcomes after cancer therapies.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10536711
- Publisher / Repository:
- Sage
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Statistical Methods in Medical Research
- Volume:
- 33
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 0962-2802
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 3 to 23
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Spatial probit generalized linear mixed models (spGLMM) with a linear fixed effect and a spatial random effect, endowed with a Gaussian Process prior, are widely used for analysis of binary spatial data. However, the canonical Bayesian implementation of this hierarchical mixed model can involve protracted Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling. Alternate approaches have been proposed that circumvent this by directly representing the marginal likelihood from spGLMM in terms of multivariate normal cummulative distribution functions (cdf). We present a direct and fast rendition of this latter approach for predictions from a spatial probit linear mixed model. We show that the covariance matrix of the cdf characterizing the marginal cdf of binary spatial data from spGLMM is amenable to approximation using Nearest Neighbor Gaussian Processes (NNGP). This facilitates a scalable prediction algorithm for spGLMM using NNGP that only involves sparse or small matrix computations and can be deployed in an embarrassingly parallel manner. We demonstrate the accuracy and scalability of the algorithm via numerous simulation experiments and an analysis of species presence-absence data.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Abstract Motivation The generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) is an extension of the generalized linear model (GLM) in which the linear predictor takes random effects into account. Given its power of precisely modeling the mixed effects from multiple sources of random variations, the method has been widely used in biomedical computation, for instance in the genome-wide association studies (GWASs) that aim to detect genetic variance significantly associated with phenotypes such as human diseases. Collaborative GWAS on large cohorts of patients across multiple institutions is often impeded by the privacy concerns of sharing personal genomic and other health data. To address such concerns, we present in this paper a privacy-preserving Expectation–Maximization (EM) algorithm to build GLMM collaboratively when input data are distributed to multiple participating parties and cannot be transferred to a central server. We assume that the data are horizontally partitioned among participating parties: i.e. each party holds a subset of records (including observational values of fixed effect variables and their corresponding outcome), and for all records, the outcome is regulated by the same set of known fixed effects and random effects. Results Our collaborative EM algorithm is mathematically equivalent to the original EM algorithm commonly used in GLMM construction. The algorithm also runs efficiently when tested on simulated and real human genomic data, and thus can be practically used for privacy-preserving GLMM construction. We implemented the algorithm for collaborative GLMM (cGLMM) construction in R. The data communication was implemented using the rsocket package. Availability and implementation The software is released in open source at https://github.com/huthvincent/cGLMM. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.more » « less
-
Abstract Calibration weighting has been widely used to correct selection biases in nonprobability sampling, missing data and causal inference. The main idea is to calibrate the biased sample to the benchmark by adjusting the subject weights. However, hard calibration can produce enormous weights when an exact calibration is enforced on a large set of extraneous covariates. This article proposes a soft calibration scheme, where the outcome and the selection indicator follow mixed-effect models. The scheme imposes an exact calibration on the fixed effects and an approximate calibration on the random effects. On the one hand, our soft calibration has an intrinsic connection with best linear unbiased prediction, which results in a more efficient estimation compared to hard calibration. On the other hand, soft calibration weighting estimation can be envisioned as penalized propensity score weight estimation, with the penalty term motivated by the mixed-effect structure. The asymptotic distribution and a valid variance estimator are derived for soft calibration. We demonstrate the superiority of the proposed estimator over other competitors in simulation studies and using a real-world data application on the effect of BMI screening on childhood obesity.more » « less
-
Abstract Differential item functioning (DIF) screening has long been suggested to ensure assessment fairness. Traditional DIF methods typically focus on the main effects of demographic variables on item parameters, overlooking the interactions among multiple identities. Drawing on the intersectionality framework, we define intersectional DIF as deviations in item parameters that arise from the interactions among demographic variables beyond their main effects and propose a novel item response theory (IRT) approach for detecting intersectional DIF. Under our framework, fixed effects are used to account for traditional DIF, while random item effects are introduced to capture intersectional DIF. We further introduce the concept of intersectional impact, which refers to interaction effects on group-level mean ability. Depending on which item parameters are affected and whether intersectional impact is considered, we propose four models, which aim to detect intersectional uniform DIF (UDIF), intersectional UDIF with intersectional impact, intersectional non-uniform DIF (NUDIF), and intersectional NUDIF with intersectional impact, respectively. For efficient model estimation, a regularized Gaussian variational expectation-maximization algorithm is developed. Simulation studies demonstrate that our methods can effectively detect intersectional UDIF, although their detection of intersectional NUDIF is more limited.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802231221201
