skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Seasonality of submarine groundwater discharge to an Arctic coastal lagoon
Abstract Supra‐permafrost submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) in the Arctic is potentially important for coastal biogeochemistry and will likely increase over the coming decades owing to climate change. Despite this, land‐to‐ocean material fluxes via SGD in Arctic environments have seldom been quantified. This study used radium (Ra) isotopes to quantify SGD fluxes to an Arctic coastal lagoon (Simpson Lagoon, Alaska) during five sampling periods between 2021 and 2023. Using a Ra mass balance model, we found that the SGD water flux was substantial and dependent on environmental conditions. No measurable SGD was detected during the spring sampling period (June 2022), when the lagoon was partially ice‐covered. During ice‐free periods, the main driver of SGD in this location is wind‐driven lagoon water level changes, not tides, which control surface water recirculation through sediments along the lagoon boundary. A combination of wind strength and direction led to low SGD fluxes in July 2022, with an SGD flux of (6 ± 3) × 106 m3 d−1, moderate fluxes in August 2021 and July 2023, which had an average flux of (17 ± 9) × 106 m3 d−1, and high fluxes in October 2022, at (79 ± 16) × 106 m3 d−1. This work demonstrates how soil and environmental conditions in the Arctic impact Ra mobilization, laying a foundation for future SGD studies in the Arctic and shedding light on the major processes driving Ra fluxes in this important environment.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2322664 1938873 1938820
PAR ID:
10537613
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
NSF-PAR
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Limnology and Oceanography
Volume:
69
Issue:
6
ISSN:
0024-3590
Page Range / eLocation ID:
1429 to 1438
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; (, NSF Arctic Data Center)
    Supra-permafrost submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) in the Arctic is poorly understood, yet has the potential to increase over the coming decades due to climate change. This study uses radium (Ra) isotopes to investigate this process by constraining seasonal SGD inputs to an Arctic coastal lagoon (Simpson Lagoon, AK). Within this dataset are 224Ra, 223Ra, 228Ra, and 226Ra activities for surface water samples (lagoon, rivers) and groundwater samples across three seasons: thaw (June 2022), open water (August 2021 and July 2022), and freeze up (September/October 2022). Experimentally determined valued for Ra desorption from riverine suspended sediments and diffusive fluxes from bottom sediments are also included. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; (, Environmental Research Letters)
    Abstract Groundwater discharge transports dissolved constituents to the ocean, affecting coastal carbon budgets and water quality. However, the magnitude and mechanisms of groundwater exchange along rapidly transitioning Arctic coastlines are largely unknown due to limited observations. Here, using first-of-its-kind coastal Arctic groundwater timeseries data, we evaluate the magnitude and drivers of groundwater discharge to Alaska’s Beaufort Sea coast. Darcy flux calculations reveal temporally variable groundwater fluxes, ranging from −6.5 cm d−1(recharge) to 14.1 cm d−1(discharge), with fluctuations in groundwater discharge or aquifer recharge over diurnal and multiday timescales during the open-water season. The average flux during the monitoring period of 4.9 cm d−1is in line with previous estimates, but the maximum discharge exceeds previous estimates by over an order-of-magnitude. While the diurnal fluctuations are small due to the microtidal conditions, multiday variability is large and drives sustained periods of aquifer recharge and groundwater discharge. Results show that wind-driven lagoon water level changes are the dominant mechanism of fluctuations in land–sea hydraulic head gradients and, in turn, groundwater discharge. Given the microtidal conditions, low topographic relief, and limited rainfall along the Beaufort Sea coast, we identify wind as an important forcing mechanism of coastal groundwater discharge and aquifer recharge with implications for nearshore biogeochemistry. This study provides insights into groundwater flux dynamics along this coastline over time and highlights an oft overlooked discharge and circulation mechanism with implications towards refining solute export estimates to coastal Arctic waters. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; (, Limnology and Oceanography)
    Abstract The tidal tributaries of the lower Chesapeake Bay experience seasonally recurring harmful algal blooms and the significance of submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) as a nutrient vector is largely unknown. Here, we determined seasonal SGD nutrient loads in two tributaries with contrasting hydrodynamic conditions, river‐fed (York River) vs. tidally dominated (Lafayette River). Radon surveys were performed in each river to quantify SGD at the embayment‐scale during spring and fall 2021. Total SGD was determined from a222Rn mass balance and Monte Carlo simulations. Submarine groundwater discharge rates differed by a factor of two during spring (Lafayette = 11 ± 17 cm d−1; York = 6 ± 10 cm d−1) and a factor of six during fall (Lafayette = 19 ± 27 cm d−1; York = 3 ± 7 cm d−1). Groundwater N concentrations and fluxes varied seasonally in the York (4–7 mmol N m−2d−1). In the Lafayette River, seasonal N fluxes (22–37 mmol N m−2d−1) were driven by seasonal water exchange rates, likely due to recurrent saltwater intrusion. Submarine groundwater discharge–derived nutrient fluxes were orders of magnitude greater than riverine inputs and runoff in each system. Additionally, sediment N removal by denitrification and anaerobic ammonium oxidation would only remove ~ 1–11% of dissolved inorganic nitrogen supplied through SGD. The continued recurrence of harmful algal blooms in the Bay's tidal tributaries may be indicative of an under‐accounting of submarine groundwater‐borne nutrient sources. This study highlights the importance of including SGD in water quality models used to advise restoration efforts in the Chesapeake Bay region and beyond. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans)
    Abstract Radium isotopes have been used to trace nutrient, carbon, and trace metal fluxes inputs from ocean margins. However, these approaches require a full accounting of radium sources to the coastal ocean including rivers. Here, we aim to quantify river radium inputs into the Arctic Ocean for the first time for226Ra and to refine the estimates for228Ra. Using new and existing data, we find that the estimated combined (dissolved plus desorbed) annual226Ra and228Ra fluxes to the Arctic Ocean are [7.0–9.4] × 1014dpm y−1and [15–18] × 1014dpm y−1, respectively. Of these totals, 44% and 60% of the river226Ra and228Ra, respectively are from suspended sediment desorption, which were estimated from laboratory incubation experiments. Using Ra isotope data from 20 major rivers around the world, we derived global annual226Ra and228Ra fluxes of [7.4–17] × 1015and [15–27] × 1015dpm y−1, respectively. As climate change spurs rapid Arctic warming, hydrological cycles are intensifying and coastal ice cover and permafrost are diminishing. These river radium inputs to the Arctic Ocean will serve as a valuable baseline as we attempt to understand the changes that warming temperatures are having on fluxes of biogeochemically important elements to the Arctic coastal zone. 
    more » « less
  5. ; (, Limnology and Oceanography)
    Abstract The strength of coastal Arctic Ocean CO2uptake is vulnerable to landscape‐scale changes such as hydrological intensification, changing climate, and alterations to terrestrial and aquatic biogeochemistry. Across a period of 4 yr (2019–2023) and three distinct sampling periods, we visited five coastal ecosystems of the Beaufort Sea with varying barrier island coverage to understand drivers of Arctic coastal CO2flux. The ice cover sampling period was characterized by the highest pCO2saturation and dissolved O2undersaturation. We observed a > 100μatm difference in pCO2over shallow depths (up to 2 m) at 73% of ice‐cover site visits. Notably, the geomorphology of barrier islands and channels controlled the flushing of colder Beaufort Sea waters across the systems and influenced the strength and appearance of both vertical thermohaline and pCO2stratification. The ice breakup period reflected spring freshet and was a net CO2sink during sampling, likely related to freshwater riverine dilution, CaCO3dissolution from sea ice melt, and water column algal activity. During the open water sampling period, the interaction of marine and terrestrial contributions predicted the strength of the CO2efflux, with freshwater inputs introducing higher temperatures and organic material, which increased remineralization. The capacity of these systems to act as CO2sources or sinks varies throughout the year and is largely driven by geomorphic conditions. Any spatially integrative studies of CO2flux or coastal productivity should consider the physical and biogeochemical heterogeneity of Arctic coastal ecosystems. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email