More Like this

1. Coupled fire-atmosphere simulation of the 2018 Camp Fire using WRF-Fire

   https://doi.org/10.1071/WF22013  

   Shamsaei, Kasra; Juliano, Timothy W.; Roberts, Matthew; Ebrahimian, Hamed; Kosovic, Branko; Lareau, Neil P.; Taciroglu, Ertugrul (January 2023, International Journal of Wildland Fire)

   Background Accurate simulation of wildfires can benefit pre-ignition mitigation and preparedness, and post-ignition emergency response management. Aims We evaluated the performance of Weather Research and Forecast-Fire (WRF-Fire), a coupled fire-atmosphere wildland fire simulation platform, in simulating a large historic fire (2018 Camp Fire). Methods A baseline model based on a setup typically used for WRF-Fire operational applications is utilised to simulate Camp Fire. Simulation results are compared to high-temporal-resolution fire perimeters derived from NEXRAD observations. The sensitivity of the model to a series of modelling parameters and assumptions governing the simulated wind field are then investigated. Results of WRF-Fire for Camp Fire are compared to FARSITE. Key results Baseline case shows non-negligible discrepancies between the simulated fire and the observations on rate of spread (ROS) and spread direction. Sensitivity analysis results show that refining the atmospheric grid of Camp Fire’s complex terrain improves fire prediction capabilities. Conclusions Sensitivity studies show the importance of refined atmosphere modelling for wildland fire simulation using WRF-Fire in complex terrains. Compared to FARSITE, WRF-Fire agrees better with the observations in terms of fire propagation rate and direction. Implications The findings suggest the need for further investigation of other possible sources of wildfire modelling uncertainties and errors. 

   more » « less
2. The early/late fire dichotomy: Time for a reassessment of Aubréville’s savanna fire experiments

   https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133316665570  

   Laris, Paul; Koné, Moussa; Dadashi, Sepideh; Dembele, Fadiala (September 2016, Progress in Physical Geography)
3. Modeling long-term fire impact on ecosystem characteristics and surface energy using a process-based vegetation–fire model SSiB4/TRIFFID-Fire v1.0

   https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6029-2020  

   Huang, Huilin; Xue, Yongkang; Li, Fang; Liu, Ye (January 2020, Geoscientific Model Development)

   null (Ed.)

   Abstract. Fire is one of the primary disturbances to the distribution and ecologicalproperties of the world's major biomes and can influence the surface fluxesand climate through vegetation–climate interactions. This study incorporatesa fire model of intermediate complexity to a biophysical model with dynamicvegetation, SSiB4/TRIFFID (The Simplified Simple Biosphere Model coupledwith the Top-down Representation of Interactive Foliage and Flora IncludingDynamics Model). This new model, SSiB4/TRIFFID-Fire, updating fire impact onthe terrestrial carbon cycle every 10 d, is then used to simulate theburned area during 1948–2014. The simulated global burned area in 2000–2014is 471.9 Mha yr−1, close to the estimate of 478.1 Mha yr−1 inGlobal Fire Emission Database v4s (GFED4s), with a spatial correlation of0.8. The SSiB4/TRIFFID-Fire reproduces temporal variations of the burnedarea at monthly to interannual scales. Specifically, it captures theobserved decline trend in northern African savanna fire and accuratelysimulates the fire seasonality in most major fire regions. The simulatedfire carbon emission is 2.19 Pg yr−1, slightly higher than the GFED4s(2.07 Pg yr−1). The SSiB4/TRIFFID-Fire is applied to assess the long-term fire impact onecosystem characteristics and surface energy budget by comparing model runswith and without fire (FIRE-ON minus FIRE-OFF). The FIRE-ON simulationreduces tree cover over 4.5 % of the global land surface, accompanied bya decrease in leaf area index and vegetation height by 0.10 m2 m−2and 1.24 m, respectively. The surface albedo and sensible heat are reducedthroughout the year, while latent heat flux decreases in the fire season butincreases in the rainy season. Fire results in an increase in surfacetemperature over most fire regions. 

   more » « less
4. The Fire and Smoke Model Evaluation Experiment—A Plan for Integrated, Large Fire–Atmosphere Field Campaigns

   https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10020066  

   Prichard, Susan; Larkin, N.; Ottmar, Roger; French, Nancy; Baker, Kirk; Brown, Tim; Clements, Craig; Dickinson, Matt; Hudak, Andrew; Kochanski, Adam; et al (February 2019, Atmosphere)

   The Fire and Smoke Model Evaluation Experiment (FASMEE) is designed to collect integrated observations from large wildland fires and provide evaluation datasets for new models and operational systems. Wildland fire, smoke dispersion, and atmospheric chemistry models have become more sophisticated, and next-generation operational models will require evaluation datasets that are coordinated and comprehensive for their evaluation and advancement. Integrated measurements are required, including ground-based observations of fuels and fire behavior, estimates of fire-emitted heat and emissions fluxes, and observations of near-source micrometeorology, plume properties, smoke dispersion, and atmospheric chemistry. To address these requirements the FASMEE campaign design includes a study plan to guide the suite of required measurements in forested sites representative of many prescribed burning programs in the southeastern United States and increasingly common high-intensity fires in the western United States. Here we provide an overview of the proposed experiment and recommendations for key measurements. The FASMEE study provides a template for additional large-scale experimental campaigns to advance fire science and operational fire and smoke models. 

   more » « less
5. A Comparison of Fire Weather Indices with MODIS Fire Days for the Natural Regions of Alaska

   https://doi.org/10.3390/f11050516  

   Ziel, Robert H.; Bieniek, Peter A.; Bhatt, Uma S.; Strader, Heidi; Rupp, T. Scott; York, Alison (May 2020, Forests)

   Research Highlights: Flammability of wildland fuels is a key factor influencing risk-based decisions related to preparedness, response, and safety in Alaska. However, without effective measures of current and expected flammability, the expected likelihood of active and problematic wildfires in the future is difficult to assess and prepare for. This study evaluates the effectiveness of diverse indices to capture high-risk fires. Indicators of drought and atmospheric drivers are assessed along with the operational Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System (CFFDRS). Background and Objectives: In this study, 13 different indicators of atmospheric conditions, fuel moisture, and flammability are compared to determine how effective each is at identifying thresholds and trends for significant wildfire activity. Materials and Methods: Flammability indices are compared with remote sensing characterizations that identify where and when fire activity has occurred. Results: Among these flammability indicators, conventional tools calibrated to wildfire thresholds (Duff Moisture Code (DMC) and Buildup Index (BUI)), as well as measures of atmospheric forcing (Vapor Pressure Deficit (VPD)), performed best at representing the conditions favoring initiation and size of significant wildfire events. Conventional assessments of seasonal severity and overall landscape flammability using DMC and BUI can be continued with confidence. Fire models that incorporate BUI in overall fire potential and fire behavior assessments are likely to produce effective results throughout boreal landscapes in Alaska. One novel result is the effectiveness of VPD throughout the state, making it a potential alternative to FFMC among the short-lag/1-day indices. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the societal value of research that joins new academic research results with operational needs. Developing the framework to do this more effectively will bring science to action with a shorter lag time, which is critical as we face growing challenges from a changing climate. 

   more » « less