Title: Rapid estimates of leaf litter chemistry using reflectance spectroscopy
Measuring the chemical traits of leaf litter is important for understanding plants’ influence on nutrient cycles, including through nutrient resorption and litter decomposition, but conventional leaf trait measurements are often destructive and labor-intensive. Here, we develop and evaluate the performance of partial least-squares regression models that use reflectance spectra of intact or ground leaves to estimate leaf litter traits, including carbon and nitrogen concentration, carbon fractions, and leaf mass per area (LMA). Our analyses included more than 300 samples of senesced foliage from 11 species of temperate trees, including both needleleaf and broadleaf species. Across all samples, we could predict each trait with moderate-to-high accuracy from both intact-leaf litter spectra (validation R2 = 0.543–0.941; %root mean squared error (RMSE) = 7.49–18.5) and ground-leaf litter spectra (validation R2 = 0.491–0.946; %RMSE = 7.00–19.5). Notably, intact-leaf spectra yielded better predictions of LMA. Our results support the feasibility of building models to estimate multiple chemical traits from leaf litter of a range of species. In particular, intact-leaf spectral models allow non-destructive trait estimation in a matter of seconds, which could enable researchers to measure the same leaves over time in studies of nutrient resorption.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1831944 2021898
PAR ID:
10554527
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Canadian Science Publishing
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Canadian Journal of Forest Research
Volume:
54
Issue:
9
ISSN:
0045-5067
Page Range / eLocation ID:
978 to 991
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. More than ever, ecologists seek to employ herbarium collections to estimate plant functional traits from the past and across biomes. However, many trait measurements are destructive, which may preclude their use on valuable specimens. Researchers increasingly use reflectance spectroscopy to estimate traits from fresh or ground leaves, and to delimit or identify taxa. Here, we extend this body of work to non-destructive measurements on pressed, intact leaves, like those in herbarium collections. Using 618 samples from 68 species, we used partial least-squares regression to build models linking pressed-leaf reflectance spectra to a broad suite of traits, including leaf mass per area (LMA), leaf dry matter content (LDMC), equivalent water thickness, carbon fractions, pigments, and twelve elements. We compared these models to those trained on fresh- or ground-leaf spectra of the same samples. The traits our pressed-leaf models could estimate best were LMA (R2 = 0.932; %RMSE = 6.56), C (R2 = 0.855; %RMSE = 9.03), and cellulose (R2 = 0.803; %RMSE = 12.2), followed by water-related traits, certain nutrients (Ca, Mg, N, and P), other carbon fractions, and pigments (all R2 = 0.514–0.790; %RMSE = 12.8–19.6). Remaining elements were predicted poorly (R2 < 0.5, %RMSE > 20). For most chemical traits, pressed-leaf models performed better than fresh-leaf models, but worse than ground-leaf models. Pressed-leaf models were worse than fresh-leaf models for estimating LMA and LDMC, but better than ground-leaf models for LMA. Finally, in a subset of samples, we used partial least-squares discriminant analysis to classify specimens among 10 species with near-perfect accuracy (>97%) from pressed- and ground-leaf spectra, and slightly lower accuracy (>93%) from fresh-leaf spectra. These results show that applying spectroscopy to pressed leaves is a promising way to estimate leaf functional traits and identify species without destructive analysis. Pressed-leaf spectra might combine advantages of fresh and ground leaves: like fresh leaves, they retain some of the spectral expression of leaf structure; but like ground leaves, they circumvent the masking effect of water absorption. Our study has far-reaching implications for capturing the wide range of functional and taxonomic information in the world’s preserved plant collections. 
    more » « less
  2. Summary Reflectance spectroscopy is a rapid method for estimating traits and discriminating species. Spectral libraries from herbarium specimens represent an untapped resource for generating broad phenomic datasets across space, time, and taxa.We conducted a proof‐of‐concept study using trait data and spectra from herbarium specimens up to 179 yr old, alongside data from recently dried and pressed leaves. We validated model accuracy and transferability for trait prediction and taxonomic discrimination.Trait models from herbarium spectra predicted leaf mass per area (LMA) withR2 = 0.94 and %RMSE = 4.86%. Models for LMA prediction were transferable between herbarium and pressed spectra, achievingR2 = 0.88, %RMSE = 8.76% for herbarium to pressed spectra, andR2 = 0.76, %RMSE = 10.5% for the reverse transfer. Discriminant models classified leaf spectra from 25 species with 74% accuracy, and classification probabilities were significantly associated with several herbarium specimen quality metrics.The results validate herbarium spectral data for trait prediction and taxonomic discrimination, and demonstrate that trait modeling can benefit from the complementary use of pressed‐leaf and herbarium‐leaf spectral datasets. These promising advancements help to justify the spectral digitization of plant biodiversity collections and support their application in broad ecological and evolutionary investigations. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract Community‐wide efforts to digitize herbarium specimens have facilitated novel uses of specimen data across scales. However, the need for destructive sampling has prevented large‐scale examination of foliar functional traits. We demonstrate that nondestructive reflectance spectra are an effective tool for estimating leaf traits from herbarium collections.Using partial least squares regression (PLSR), we developed and evaluated trait estimation models for leaf mass per area (LMA), nitrogen content (N) and carbon content (C) from nondestructive leaf‐level spectra and destructive trait measurements from herbarium specimens. Our modelling dataset consisted of temperate species collected in the Minneapolis‐St. Paul area (Minnesota, USA) between 1876 and 2022. We also trained biased models excluding sample subsets corresponding to specimen age, habit, growth form and species categories to assess the transferability of PLSR trait estimation models. Finally, we evaluated whether leaf traits estimated from spectra recover the temporal trends observed in destructively measured traits.Our PLSR models accurately estimate LMA and N, and reasonably estimate C. They are robust to sample greenness, specimen age and species, but sensitive to mismatches in functional group categories between the training and target data. Furthermore, spectrally estimated LMA and N reproduce temporal trends observed in measured traits over the 146‐year time series; estimated C reproduces most temporal trends despite poorer model performance than the other traits.Given the limitations of broad destructive sampling from herbarium collections, we show that PLSR models trained on younger specimens can reliably estimate leaf traits from older specimens. While we caution that trait estimation models are only as good as their training data, we are optimistic that spectroscopy can capture the extensive functional data preserved in herbarium collections in a largely nondestructive manner. 
    more » « less
  4. ABSTRACT Leaf intrinsic water use efficiency (iWUE) quantifies the trade‐off between carbon assimilation and water loss in plants, and is constrained by leaf traits such as maximum carboxylation capacity (Vc,max) and stomatal conductance. Yet, the potential links of iWUE with leaf elementomes across different forest types remain unclear. Here, we analyzed iWUE (estimated by leaf carbon isotopes) variability and its associations withVc,max, stomatal conductance (estimated by18O enrichment in leaf dry matter above source water, Δ18O), and leaf elementomes across 82 tree species from temperate, subtropical and tropical forests, and evaluated the effectiveness of leaf reflectance spectroscopy as an indicator of iWUE variability and trait–iWUE associations. Across species,Vc,max, Δ18O, leaf mass per area (LMA) and leaf iron, nitrogen, sodium and manganese concentrations were the traits most strongly associated with cross‐site iWUE variability. Furthermore, climatic factors (mean annual precipitation, mean annual temperature and climate moisture index) shaped trait–iWUE covariation by negatively linking leaf elements and positively with LMA, which affected iWUE more directly than indirectly viaVc,maxand Δ18O. Leaf reflectance spectroscopy accurately predicted iWUE (R2 = 0.83), and the trait–iWUE relationships derived from spectral modelling were consistent with those obtained through field measurements. These findings reveal strong linkages between the leaf elementomes and iWUE, and highlight the potential of reflectance spectroscopy for characterizing iWUE variability and trait–iWUE relationships, thereby improving process modelling of forest carbon and water cycles. 
    more » « less
  5. Summary Leaf dark respiration (Rdark), an important yet rarely quantified component of carbon cycling in forest ecosystems, is often simulated from leaf traits such as the maximum carboxylation capacity (Vcmax), leaf mass per area (LMA), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations, in terrestrial biosphere models. However, the validity of these relationships across forest types remains to be thoroughly assessed.Here, we analyzedRdarkvariability and its associations withVcmaxand other leaf traits across three temperate, subtropical and tropical forests in China, evaluating the effectiveness of leaf spectroscopy as a superior monitoring alternative.We found that leaf magnesium and calcium concentrations were more significant in explaining cross‐siteRdarkthan commonly used traits like LMA, N and P concentrations, but univariate trait–Rdarkrelationships were always weak (r2 ≤ 0.15) and forest‐specific. Although multivariate relationships of leaf traits improved the model performance, leaf spectroscopy outperformed trait–Rdarkrelationships, accurately predicted cross‐siteRdark(r2 = 0.65) and pinpointed the factors contributing toRdarkvariability.Our findings reveal a few novel traits with greater cross‐site scalability regardingRdark, challenging the use of empirical trait–Rdarkrelationships in process models and emphasize the potential of leaf spectroscopy as a promising alternative for estimatingRdark, which could ultimately improve process modeling of terrestrial plant respiration. 
    more » « less