An official website of the United States government
More than ever, ecologists seek to employ herbarium collections to estimate plant functional traits from the past and across biomes. However, many trait measurements are destructive, which may preclude their use on valuable specimens. Researchers increasingly use reflectance spectroscopy to estimate traits from fresh or ground leaves, and to delimit or identify taxa. Here, we extend this body of work to non-destructive measurements on pressed, intact leaves, like those in herbarium collections. Using 618 samples from 68 species, we used partial least-squares regression to build models linking pressed-leaf reflectance spectra to a broad suite of traits, including leaf mass per area (LMA), leaf dry matter content (LDMC), equivalent water thickness, carbon fractions, pigments, and twelve elements. We compared these models to those trained on fresh- or ground-leaf spectra of the same samples. The traits our pressed-leaf models could estimate best were LMA (R2 = 0.932; %RMSE = 6.56), C (R2 = 0.855; %RMSE = 9.03), and cellulose (R2 = 0.803; %RMSE = 12.2), followed by water-related traits, certain nutrients (Ca, Mg, N, and P), other carbon fractions, and pigments (all R2 = 0.514–0.790; %RMSE = 12.8–19.6). Remaining elements were predicted poorly (R2 < 0.5, %RMSE > 20). For most chemical traits, pressed-leaf models performed better than fresh-leaf models, but worse than ground-leaf models. Pressed-leaf models were worse than fresh-leaf models for estimating LMA and LDMC, but better than ground-leaf models for LMA. Finally, in a subset of samples, we used partial least-squares discriminant analysis to classify specimens among 10 species with near-perfect accuracy (>97%) from pressed- and ground-leaf spectra, and slightly lower accuracy (>93%) from fresh-leaf spectra. These results show that applying spectroscopy to pressed leaves is a promising way to estimate leaf functional traits and identify species without destructive analysis. Pressed-leaf spectra might combine advantages of fresh and ground leaves: like fresh leaves, they retain some of the spectral expression of leaf structure; but like ground leaves, they circumvent the masking effect of water absorption. Our study has far-reaching implications for capturing the wide range of functional and taxonomic information in the world’s preserved plant collections.
more »
« less
Seeing herbaria in a new light: leaf reflectance spectroscopy unlocks trait and classification modeling in plant biodiversity collections
Summary Reflectance spectroscopy is a rapid method for estimating traits and discriminating species. Spectral libraries from herbarium specimens represent an untapped resource for generating broad phenomic datasets across space, time, and taxa.We conducted a proof‐of‐concept study using trait data and spectra from herbarium specimens up to 179 yr old, alongside data from recently dried and pressed leaves. We validated model accuracy and transferability for trait prediction and taxonomic discrimination.Trait models from herbarium spectra predicted leaf mass per area (LMA) withR2 = 0.94 and %RMSE = 4.86%. Models for LMA prediction were transferable between herbarium and pressed spectra, achievingR2 = 0.88, %RMSE = 8.76% for herbarium to pressed spectra, andR2 = 0.76, %RMSE = 10.5% for the reverse transfer. Discriminant models classified leaf spectra from 25 species with 74% accuracy, and classification probabilities were significantly associated with several herbarium specimen quality metrics.The results validate herbarium spectral data for trait prediction and taxonomic discrimination, and demonstrate that trait modeling can benefit from the complementary use of pressed‐leaf and herbarium‐leaf spectral datasets. These promising advancements help to justify the spectral digitization of plant biodiversity collections and support their application in broad ecological and evolutionary investigations.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2021898
- PAR ID:
- 10632295
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- New Phytologist
- ISSN:
- 0028-646X
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Summary Leaf dark respiration (Rdark), an important yet rarely quantified component of carbon cycling in forest ecosystems, is often simulated from leaf traits such as the maximum carboxylation capacity (Vcmax), leaf mass per area (LMA), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations, in terrestrial biosphere models. However, the validity of these relationships across forest types remains to be thoroughly assessed.Here, we analyzedRdarkvariability and its associations withVcmaxand other leaf traits across three temperate, subtropical and tropical forests in China, evaluating the effectiveness of leaf spectroscopy as a superior monitoring alternative.We found that leaf magnesium and calcium concentrations were more significant in explaining cross‐siteRdarkthan commonly used traits like LMA, N and P concentrations, but univariate trait–Rdarkrelationships were always weak (r2 ≤ 0.15) and forest‐specific. Although multivariate relationships of leaf traits improved the model performance, leaf spectroscopy outperformed trait–Rdarkrelationships, accurately predicted cross‐siteRdark(r2 = 0.65) and pinpointed the factors contributing toRdarkvariability.Our findings reveal a few novel traits with greater cross‐site scalability regardingRdark, challenging the use of empirical trait–Rdarkrelationships in process models and emphasize the potential of leaf spectroscopy as a promising alternative for estimatingRdark, which could ultimately improve process modeling of terrestrial plant respiration.more » « less
-
Measuring the chemical traits of leaf litter is important for understanding plants’ influence on nutrient cycles, including through nutrient resorption and litter decomposition, but conventional leaf trait measurements are often destructive and labor-intensive. Here, we develop and evaluate the performance of partial least-squares regression models that use reflectance spectra of intact or ground leaves to estimate leaf litter traits, including carbon and nitrogen concentration, carbon fractions, and leaf mass per area (LMA). Our analyses included more than 300 samples of senesced foliage from 11 species of temperate trees, including both needleleaf and broadleaf species. Across all samples, we could predict each trait with moderate-to-high accuracy from both intact-leaf litter spectra (validation R2 = 0.543–0.941; %root mean squared error (RMSE) = 7.49–18.5) and ground-leaf litter spectra (validation R2 = 0.491–0.946; %RMSE = 7.00–19.5). Notably, intact-leaf spectra yielded better predictions of LMA. Our results support the feasibility of building models to estimate multiple chemical traits from leaf litter of a range of species. In particular, intact-leaf spectral models allow non-destructive trait estimation in a matter of seconds, which could enable researchers to measure the same leaves over time in studies of nutrient resorption.more » « less
-
Summary Allocation of leaf phosphorus (P) among different functional fractions represents a crucial adaptive strategy for optimizing P use. However, it remains challenging to monitor the variability in leaf P fractions and, ultimately, to understand P‐use strategies across diverse plant communities.We explored relationships between five leaf P fractions (orthophosphate P, Pi; lipid P, PL; nucleic acid P, PN; metabolite P, PM; and residual P, PR) and 11 leaf economic traits of 58 woody species from three biomes in China, including temperate, subtropical and tropical forests. Then, we developed trait‐based models and spectral models for leaf P fractions and compared their predictive abilities.We found that plants exhibiting conservative strategies increased the proportions of PNand PM, but decreased the proportions of Piand PL, thus enhancing photosynthetic P‐use efficiency, especially under P limitation. Spectral models outperformed trait‐based models in predicting cross‐site leaf P fractions, regardless of concentrations (R2 = 0.50–0.88 vs 0.34–0.74) or proportions (R2 = 0.43–0.70 vs 0.06–0.45).These findings enhance our understanding of leaf P‐allocation strategies and highlight reflectance spectroscopy as a promising alternative for characterizing large‐scale leaf P fractions and plant P‐use strategies, which could ultimately improve the physiological representation of the plant P cycle in land surface models.more » « less
-
Leaf traits are essential for understanding many physiological and ecological processes. Partial least squares regression (PLSR) models with leaf spectroscopy are widely applied for trait estimation, but their transferability across space, time, and plant functional types (PFTs) remains unclear.We compiled a novel dataset of paired leaf traits and spectra, with 47 393 records for > 700 species and eight PFTs at 101 globally distributed locations across multiple seasons. Using this dataset, we conducted an unprecedented comprehensive analysis to assess the transferability of PLSR models in estimating leaf traits.While PLSR models demonstrate commendable performance in predicting chlorophyll content, carotenoid, leaf water, and leaf mass per area prediction within their training data space, their efficacy diminishes when extrapolating to new contexts. Specifically, extrapolating to locations, seasons, and PFTs beyond the training data leads to reducedR2(0.12–0.49, 0.15–0.42, and 0.25–0.56) and increased NRMSE (3.58–18.24%, 6.27–11.55%, and 7.0–33.12%) compared with nonspatial random cross‐validation. The results underscore the importance of incorporating greater spectral diversity in model training to boost its transferability.These findings highlight potential errors in estimating leaf traits across large spatial domains, diverse PFTs, and time due to biased validation schemes, and provide guidance for future field sampling strategies and remote sensing applications.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.70357
