Large‐scale analysis of functional connectivity within intrinsic brain networks using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data has been widely used for identifying biomarkers in various psychiatric disorders. While the emerging access to large neuroimaging datasets provides unprecedented opportunities for exploring brain functions, they also pose significant computational complexity challenges due to the large amount of inherent variability across individuals and the complexity of brain activity patterns. To address these challenges, this paper introduces two novel constrained ICA methods, arc‐EBM and minc‐EBM, designed to overcome the computational complexity issue by incorporating prior information into the analysis framework. The proposed methods preserve the subject variability by adaptively selecting the constrained parameters for different functional networks and individuals, while also allowing estimation flexibility for activities not covered by the prior information through the concept of free components. Our methods are shown to enhance the precision of functional network estimation and improve the capture of subject variability across different cohorts. We evaluate the proposed methods using both synthetic and real fMRI data. By applying the proposed methods to a resting‐state fMRI dataset including 179 subjects, both algorithms successfully reveal significant group differences in functional network connectivity between healthy controls and schizophrenia patients. The observed group differences, particularly the abnormal connectivity alterations in networks involving the thalamus, subthalamus/hypothalamus, and superior temporal gyrus, align with findings from previous clinical studies. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that the constraint parameters adaptively selected by arc‐EBM reveal more diverse resting‐state network structures in individuals with schizophrenia compared with healthy controls. This finding is consistent with prior studies and suggests that the selected constraint parameters could serve as potential biomarkers for mental disorder diagnosis. 
                        more » 
                        « less   
                    
                            
                            Numerical uncertainty in analytical pipelines lead to impactful variability in brain networks
                        
                    
    
            The analysis of brain-imaging data requires complex processing pipelines to support findings on brain function or pathologies. Recent work has shown that variability in analytical decisions, small amounts of noise, or computational environments can lead to substantial differences in the results, endangering the trust in conclusions. We explored the instability of results by instrumenting a structural connectome estimation pipeline with Monte Carlo Arithmetic to introduce random noise throughout. We evaluated the reliability of the connectomes, the robustness of their features, and the eventual impact on analysis. The stability of results was found to range from perfectly stable (i.e. all digits of data significant) to highly unstable (i.e. 0 − 1 significant digits). This paper highlights the potential of leveraging induced variance in estimates of brain connectivity to reduce the bias in networks without compromising reliability, alongside increasing the robustness and potential upper-bound of their applications in the classification of individual differences. We demonstrate that stability evaluations are necessary for understanding error inherent to brain imaging experiments, and how numerical analysis can be applied to typical analytical workflows both in brain imaging and other domains of computational sciences, as the techniques used were data and context agnostic and globally relevant. Overall, while the extreme variability in results due to analytical instabilities could severely hamper our understanding of brain organization, it also affords us the opportunity to increase the robustness of findings. 
        more » 
        « less   
        
    
                            - Award ID(s):
- 2019976
- PAR ID:
- 10574293
- Editor(s):
- Dimitriadis, Stavros I
- Publisher / Repository:
- PLoS
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- PLOS ONE
- Volume:
- 16
- Issue:
- 11
- ISSN:
- 1932-6203
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- e0250755
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
- 
            
- 
            Gutkin, Boris S. (Ed.)Converging evidence suggests the brain encodes time in dynamic patterns of neural activity, including neural sequences, ramping activity, and complex dynamics. Most temporal tasks, however, require more than just encoding time, and can have distinct computational requirements including the need to exhibit temporal scaling, generalize to novel contexts, or robustness to noise. It is not known how neural circuits can encode time and satisfy distinct computational requirements, nor is it known whether similar patterns of neural activity at the population level can exhibit dramatically different computational or generalization properties. To begin to answer these questions, we trained RNNs on two timing tasks based on behavioral studies. The tasks had different input structures but required producing identically timed output patterns. Using a novel framework we quantified whether RNNs encoded two intervals using either of three different timing strategies: scaling, absolute, or stimulus-specific dynamics. We found that similar neural dynamic patterns at the level of single intervals, could exhibit fundamentally different properties, including, generalization, the connectivity structure of the trained networks, and the contribution of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. Critically, depending on the task structure RNNs were better suited for generalization or robustness to noise. Further analysis revealed different connection patterns underlying the different regimes. Our results predict that apparently similar neural dynamic patterns at the population level (e.g., neural sequences) can exhibit fundamentally different computational properties in regards to their ability to generalize to novel stimuli and their robustness to noise—and that these differences are associated with differences in network connectivity and distinct contributions of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. We also predict that the task structure used in different experimental studies accounts for some of the experimentally observed variability in how networks encode time.more » « less
- 
            We developed a novel Proactive Reactive and Attentional Dynamics (PRAD) computational model designed to dissect the latent mechanisms of inhibitory control in human cognition. Leveraging data from over 7,500 participants in the NIH Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study, we demonstrate that PRAD surpasses traditional models by integrating proactive, reactive, and attentional components of inhibitory control. Employing a hierarchical Bayesian framework, PRAD offers a granular view of the dynamics underpinning action execution and inhibition, provides debiased estimates of stop-signal reaction times, and elucidates individual and temporal variability in cognitive control processes. Our findings reveal significant intra-individual variability, challenging conventional assumptions of random variability across trials. By addressing nonergodicity and systematically accounting for the multi-componential nature of cognitive control, PRAD advances our understanding of the cognitive mechanisms driving individual differences in cognitive control and provides a sophisticated computational framework for dissecting dynamic cognitive processes across diverse populations.more » « less
- 
            Abstract Brain functional connectivity (FC) derived from functional magnetic resonance imaging has been serving as a potential ‘fingerprint’ for adults. However, cross-scan variation of FC can be substantial and carries biological information, especially during childhood. Here we performed a large-scale cross-sectional analysis on cross-scan FC stability and its associations with a diverse range of health measures in children. Functional network connectivity (FNC) was extracted via a hybrid independent component analysis framework on 9,071 participants and compared across four scans. We found that FNC can identify a given child from a large group with high accuracy (maximum >94%) and replicated the results across multiple scans. We then performed a linear mixed-effects model to investigate how cross-scan FNC stability was predictive of children’s behaviour. Although we could not find strong relationships between FNC stability and children’s behaviour, we observed significant but small associations between them (maximumr = 0.1070), with higher stability correlated with better cognitive performance, longer sleep duration and less psychotic expression. Via a multivariate analysis method, we captured larger effects between FNC stability and children’s cognitive performance (maximumr = 0.2932), which further proved the relevance of FNC stability to neurocognitive development. Overall, our findings show that a child’s connectivity profile is not only intrinsic but also exhibits reliable variability across scans, regardless of brain growth and development. Cross-scan connectivity stability may serve as a valuable neuroimaging feature to draw inferences on early cognitive and psychiatric behaviours in children.more » « less
- 
            Background: Human brain structural connectivity is an important imaging quantitative trait for brain development and aging. Mapping the network connectivity to the phenotypic variation provides fundamental insights in understanding the relationship between detailed brain topological architecture, function, and dysfunction. However, the underlying neurobiological mechanism from gene to brain connectome, and to phenotypic outcomes, and whether this mechanism changes over time, remain unclear. Methods: This study analyzes diffusion-weighted imaging data from two age-specific neuroimaging cohorts, extracts structural connectome topological network measures, performs genome-wide association studies of the measures, and examines the causality of genetic influences on phenotypic outcomes mediated via connectivity measures. Results: Our empirical study has yielded several significant findings: 1) It identified genetic makeup underlying structural connectivity changes in the human brain connectome for both age groups. Specifically, it revealed a novel association between the minor allele (G) of rs7937515 and the decreased network segregation measures of the left middle temporal gyrus across young and elderly adults, indicating a consistent genetic effect on brain connectivity across the lifespan. 2) It revealed rs7937515 as a genetic marker for body mass index in young adults but not in elderly adults. 3) It discovered brain network segregation alterations as a potential neuroimaging biomarker for obesity. 4) It demonstrated the hemispheric asymmetry of structural network organization in genetic association analyses and outcome-relevant studies. Discussion: These imaging genetic findings underlying brain connectome warrant further investigation for exploring their potential influences on brain-related complex diseases, given the significant involvement of altered connectivity in neurological, psychiatric and physical disorders.more » « less
 An official website of the United States government
An official website of the United States government 
				
			 
					 
					
 
                                    