skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Characterization of 3D Printed and Wire Embedded Thermoplastic Composite Structures
This research evaluates and characterizes the thermal and physical characteristics of thermoplastic specimens embedded with resistive wire using a Fused Filament Fabrication 3D printer. The specimens were manufactured through a novel approach “Pause and Go” in additive manufacturing for embedding resistive wires into a 3D printed thermoplastic substrate using a custom-built wire embedding tool integrated into a commercially available desktop scale Independent Dual Extruder (IDEX) printer. Wire- embedded test specimens were produced via 3D printing using Polylactic Acid. The 26-gauge nichrome wire was embedded in the top substrate and continued the printing to fully embed the wires. Thermal testing was carried out and observed steady-state temperatures after 30 minutes. The wire pulls tests characterized the bonding strength of the wire and substrate.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2301925
PAR ID:
10584327
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
The University of Texas at Austin - Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium – An Additive Manufacturing Conference
Date Published:
Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
3D printing
Format(s):
Medium: X
Right(s):
open
Institution:
Austin, The University Of Texas At
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; ; (, American Society of Mechanical Engineers)
    Abstract Additive manufacturing (AM), also known as 3D printing, has significantly advanced in recent years, especially with the introduction of multifunctional 3D-printed parts. AM fabricated monolith has multiple material capabilities, thus various functionalities are well-perceived by the manufacturing communities. As an example, a traditional fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D printer fabricates multi-material thermoplastic parts using a dual extrusion system to increase the functionality of the part including variable stiffening and gradient structures. In addition to the multiple thermoplastic feedstocks in a dual extrusion system, multifunctional AM can be achieved by embedding electronics or reinforcing fibers within the fabricated thermoplastic parts, which significantly impacts the rapid prototyping of hybrid components in manufacturing industries. State-of-the-art techniques such as coextrusion systems, ultrasonic welding tools, and thermal embedding tools have been implemented to automate the process of embedding conductive material within the 3D-printed thermoplastic substrate. The goal of this tool development effort is to embed wires within 3D 3D-printed plastic substrate. This research consisted of developing a wire embedding tool that can be integrated into an FFF desktop 3D printer to deposit conductive as well as resistive wires within the 3D-printed thermoplastic substrate. By realizing the challenges for discrete materials interaction at the interface such as nichrome wires and Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) plastics and polylactic acid (PLA), the goal of this tool was to immerse wire within ABS and PLA substrate using transient swelling mechanisms under non-polar solvent. A proof-of-concept test stands with a wire feed system and the embedding wheel was first designed and manufactured using 3D printing to examine if a traditional roller-guided system, primarily used for plastic extrusion, would be sufficient for wire extrusion. The development of the integrated wire embedding tool was initiated based on the success of the proof-of-concept wire extrusion system. The design of the integrated wire embedding tool consisted of three sub-assemblies: wire delivery assembly, wire shearing assembly, and swivel assembly. The wire delivery assembly is responsible for feeding the wire towards the thermoplastic using the filament delivery system seen within FFF printers. For the wire shearing mechanism, a cutting Tungsten carbide blade in conjunction with a Nema-17 external stepper motor was used to shear the wire. For the wire embedding assembly, a custom swivel mount was fabricated with a bearing housing for a ball bearing that allowed for a 360-degree motion around the horizontal plane. A wire guide nozzle was placed through the mount to allow for the wire to be fed down into a brass embedding wheel in a tangential manner. Additionally, the solvent reservoir was mounted such that an even layer of solution was dispensed onto the thermoplastic substrate. Through this tool development effort, the aim was to develop technologies that will enable 3D printing of wire-embedded monolith for various applications including a self-heating mold of thermoset-based composite manufacturing as well as smart composites with embedded sensors. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; (, The University of Texas at Austin - Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium – An Additive Manufacturing Conference)
    In the composite manufacturing industry, production tooling commonly requires preheating for molding. The most commonly used method for preheating is indirect heating, in which heat is transferred from heat sources to the materials by convection and radiation. However, in the case of direct heating, in which heat is generated directly within a material by passing an electric current through it, the tools are preheated through joule heating. In this project, we manufactured a self- heating mold for direct heating. The manufacturing process involves 3D printing self-heating tooling, in which resistive wires are embedded into the tool at every so number of layers using a programmed 3D printer. Thermal characterizations were performed on the self-heating tool and a thermoset composite layup process was performed to study the suitability of the mold. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Additive Manufacturing)
    The development of new thermoplastic-based nanocomposites for, as well as using, 3D printing requires extensive experimental testing. One typically goes through many failed, or otherwise sub-optimal, iterations before finding acceptable solutions (e.g. compositions, 3D printing parameters). It is desirable to reduce the number of such iterations as well as exclude failed experiments that often require laborious disassembly and cleaning of the 3D printer. This issue could be addressed if we were able to understand, and ultimately predict ahead of experiments if a given material can be 3D printed successfully. Herein, we report on our investigations into forecasting the printing and resultant properties of polymer nanocomposites while encompassing both material properties and printing parameters, enabling the model to generalize across various thermoplastics and additives. To do so, nanocomposites of two different commercially available bio-based PLAs with varying concentrations of nanoclay (NC) and graphene nanoplatelets (GNP) were prepared using a twin-screw extruder. The thermal and rheological properties of the nanocomposites were analyzed. These materials were printed at varying temperature and flow using a pellet printer. The quality of the printing was evaluated by measuring weight fluctuation, internal diameter of cylindrical specimen, and surface uniformity. The interactions between material properties and printing parameters are complex but captured effectively by a machine learning model, specifically we demonstrate such a predictive model to forecast printability and, printing quality utilizing a Random Forest algorithm. Printability was predicted by developing a classification model with constraints based on the weight fluctuation (W ) of the printed sample w.r.t. the optimal print; defining ‘‘not printable’’ for −1.0 d W < −0.8 and ‘‘printable’’ for W e −0.8. The classification model for predicting printability, performed well with an accuracy of 92.8% and identified flow index and complex viscosity, contributing 52% to the model’s importance. Another model to predict W of the only on successful prints also showed strong performance, emphasizing the importance of viscoelastic properties, thermal stability, and printing temperature. For diameter change (Di), the Random Forest model identified flow consistency index, complex viscosity, and thermal stability as influential parameters, with crystallization enthalpy gaining increased importance, reflecting its role in crystallization and shrinkage. In contrast, the surface roughness average (RA) model had lower performance, yet revealed remarkable insights regarding the feature importance with crystallization enthalpy and complex viscosity being most significant. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; (, 236th Electrochemical Society Meeting Abstracts)
    Force sensors play an important role in the biomedical devices industry, especially in motion- and pressure-related devices. Such sensors are designed to collect force or pressure data by converting it into electrical signals. The data can then be sent to and analyzed by a local or cloud-based processing unit. It is vital that the sensors can be fabricated in a way that time efficiency, cost efficiency, and quality are all maximized. The advent of three-dimensional (3D) printing has greatly facilitated prototyping and customized manufacturing, as compared to older crafting methods (such as welding and woodworking), 3D printing requires less skill and involves less costly materials making it much more time- and cost-efficient. Technological advancements have also improved the quality of the actual sensing materials used in sensor-based devices, and notably, carbon-based materials have become increasingly favored for use as sensing elements. In the presented sensor, the modern sensor fabrication methods of 3D printing and using carbon materials as sensing elements are combined. The sensor presented as a proof of the above concepts is a cantilever flex sensor. The sensor consists of a 30 mm-long cantilever extending from a 2.5 mm-thick wall, with a second wall of the same thickness parallel to the cantilever. After designing this structure and printing it using a 3D printer, the top surface of the cantilever was coated with a thin layer of conductive carbon paste and two copper wires were stripped and soldered to a pair of copper alligator clips, to be used for testing purposes. To test the sensor, the two copper wires were clipped onto the sensor (Figure 1A) and each wire was connected to a multimeter probe on the end opposite of the alligator clip. Then, using a set of four through holes in the parallel wall (along with a slotted rod), the tip of the cantilever was pressed down to an angle of 5, 10, 15, or 20 degrees (Figures 1B, 1C, 1D, and 1E, respectively) below the original plane of the cantilever and held there for 2 minutes. The resistance between the ends of the cantilever was measured throughout each trial by the multimeter, and the results (Figure 1F) for each angle were compiled and analyzed to determine the effect of each depression angle on impedance change, and thus, the overall effectiveness of the sensor. In the future, a notable improvement would be miniaturizing the sensor to facilitate in integration of the sensor in wearable and biomedical devices. 
    more » « less
  5. (, Additive manufacturing)
    Additive manufacturing promises to revolutionize manufacturing industries. However, 3D printing of novel build materials is currently limited by constraints inherent to printer designs. In this work, a bench-top powder melt extrusion (PME) 3D printer head was designed and fabricated to print parts directly from powder-based materials rather than filament. The final design of the PME printer head evolved from the Rich Rap Universal Pellet Extruder (RRUPE) design and was realized through an iterative approach. The PME printer was made possible by modifications to the funnel shape, pressure applied to the extrudate by the auger, and hot end structure. Through comparison of parts printed with the PME printer with those from a commercially available fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D printer using common thermoplastics poly(lactide) (PLA), high impact poly(styrene) (HIPS), and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) powders (< 1 mm in diameter), evaluation of the printer performance was performed. For each build material, the PME printed objects show comparable viscoelastic properties by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) to those of the FFF objects. However, due to a significant difference in printer resolution between PME (X–Y resolution of 0.8 mm and a Z-layer height calibrated to 0.1 mm) and FFF (X–Y resolution of 0.4 mm and a Z-layer height of 0.18 mm), as well as, an inherently more inconsistent feed of build material for PME than FFF, the resulting print quality, determined by a dimensional analysis and surface roughness comparisons, of the PME printed objects was lower than that of the FFF printed parts based on the print layer uniformity and structure. Further, due to the poorer print resolution and inherent inconsistent build material feed of the PME, the bulk tensile strength and Young’s moduli of the objects printed by PME were lower and more inconsistent (49.2 ± 10.7 MPa and 1620 ± 375 MPa, respectively) than those of FFF printed objects (57.7 ± 2.31 MPa and 2160 ± 179 MPa, respectively). Nevertheless, PME print methods promise an opportunity to provide a platform on which it is possible to rapidly prototype a myriad of thermoplastic materials for 3D printing. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email