skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: “Any Other Thoughts, Hedgehog?” Linking Deliberation Chains in Collaborative Dialogues
Question-asking in collaborative dialogue has long been established as key to knowledge construction, both in internal and collaborative problem solving. In this work, we examine probing questions in collaborative dialogues: questions that explicitly elicit responses from the speaker`s interlocutors. Specifically, we focus on modeling the causal relations that lead directly from utterances earlier in the dialogue to the emergence of the probing question. We model these relations using a novel graph-based framework of *deliberation chains*, and realize the problem of constructing such chains as a coreference-style clustering problem. Our framework jointly models probing and causal utterances and the links between them, and we evaluate on two challenging collaborative task datasets: the Weights Task and DeliData. Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of our theoretically-grounded approach compared to both baselines and stronger coreference approaches, and establish a standard of performance in this novel task.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2019805
PAR ID:
10586889
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Association for Computational Linguistics
Date Published:
Page Range / eLocation ID:
5297 to 5314
Format(s):
Medium: X
Location:
Miami, Florida, USA
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; (, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence)
    Multimodal dialogue involving multiple participants presents complex computational challenges, primarily due to the rich interplay of diverse communicative modalities including speech, gesture, action, and gaze. These modalities interact in complex ways that traditional dialogue systems often struggle to accurately track and interpret. To address these challenges, we extend the textual enrichment strategy of Dense Paraphrasing (DP), by translating each nonverbal modality into linguistic expressions. By normalizing multimodal information into a language-based form, we hope to both simplify the representation for and enhance the computational understanding of situated dialogues. We show the effectiveness of the dense paraphrased language form by evaluating instruction-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) against the Common Ground Tracking (CGT) problem using a publicly available collaborative problem-solving dialogue dataset. Instead of using multimodal LLMs, the dense paraphrasing technique represents the dialogue information from multiple modalities in a compact and structured machine-readable text format that can be directly processed by the language-only models. We leverage the capability of LLMs to transform machine-readable paraphrases into human-readable paraphrases, and show that this process can further improve the result on the CGT task. Overall, the results show that augmenting the context with dense paraphrasing effectively facilitates the LLMs' alignment of information from multiple modalities, and in turn largely improves the performance of common ground reasoning over the baselines. Our proposed pipeline with original utterances as input context already achieves comparable results to the baseline that utilized decontextualized utterances which contain rich coreference information. When also using the decontextualized input, our pipeline largely improves the performance of common ground reasoning over the baselines. We discuss the potential of DP to create a robust model that can effectively interpret and integrate the subtleties of multimodal communication, thereby improving dialogue system performance in real-world settings. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, Journal of educational data mining)
    In the realm of collaborative learning, extracting the beliefs shared within a group is a critical capability to navigate complex tasks. Inherent in this problem is the fact that in naturalistic collaborative discourse, the same propositional content may be expressed in radically different ways. This difficulty is exacerbated when speech overlaps and other communicative modalities are used, as would be the case in a co-situated collaborative task. In this paper, we conduct a comparative methodological analysis of extraction techniques for task-relevant propositions from natural speech dialogues in a challenging shared task setting where participants collaboratively determine the weights of five blocks using only a balance scale. We encode utterances and candidate propositions through language models and compare a cross-encoder method, adapted from coreference research, to a vector similarity baseline. Our cross-encoder approach outperforms both a cosine similarity baseline and zero-shot inference by both the GPT-4 and LLaMA 2 language models, and we establish a novel baseline on this challenging task on two collaborative task datasets---the Weights Task and DeliData---showing the generalizability of our approach. Furthermore, we explore the use of state of the art large language models for data augmentation to enhance performance, extend our examination to transcripts generated by Google's Automatic Speech Recognition system to assess the potential for automating the propositional extraction process in real-time, and introduce a framework for live propositional extraction from natural speech and multimodal signals. This study not only demonstrates the feasibility of detecting collaboration-relevant content in unstructured interactions but also lays the groundwork for employing AI to enhance collaborative problem-solving in classrooms, and other collaborative settings, such as the workforce. Our code may be found at: (https://github.com/csu-signal/PropositionExtraction). 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; ; ; (, International Educational Data Mining Society)
    Mills, Caitlin; Alexandron, Giora; Taibi, Davide; Lo_Bosco, Giosuè; Paquette, Luc (Ed.)
    Effective feedback is essential for refining instructional practices in mathematics education, and researchers often turn to advanced natural language processing (NLP) models to analyze classroom dialogues from multiple perspectives. However, utterance-level discourse analysis encounters two primary challenges: (1) multi-functionality, where a single utterance may serve multiple purposes that a single tag cannot capture, and (2) the exclusion of many utterances from domain-specific discourse move classifications, leading to their omission in feedback. To address these challenges, we proposed a multi-perspective discourse analysis that integrates domain-specific talk moves with dialogue act (using the flattened multi-functional SWBD-MASL schema with 43 tags) and discourse relation (applying Segmented Discourse Representation Theory with 16 relations). Our top-down analysis framework enables a comprehensive understanding of utterances that contain talk moves, as well as utterances that do not contain talk moves. This is applied to two mathematics education datasets: TalkMoves (teaching) and SAGA22 (tutoring). Through distributional unigram analysis, sequential talk move analysis, and multi-view deep dive, we discovered meaningful discourse patterns, and revealed the vital role of utterances without talk moves, demonstrating that these utterances, far from being mere fillers, serve crucial functions in guiding, acknowledging, and structuring classroom discourse. These insights underscore the importance of incorporating discourse relations and dialogue acts into AI-assisted education systems to enhance feedback and create more responsive learning environments. Our framework may prove helpful for providing human educator feedback, but also aiding in the development of AI agents that can effectively emulate the roles of both educators and students. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ; ; (, International Educational Data Mining Society)
    Mills, Caitlin; Alexandron, Giora; Taibi, Davide; Lo_Bosco, Giosue; Paquette, Luc (Ed.)
    in mathematics education, and researchers often turn to advanced natural language processing (NLP) models to analyze classroom dialogues from multiple perspectives. However, utterance-level discourse analysis encounters two primary challenges: (1) multifunctionality, where a single utterance may serve multiple purposes that a single tag cannot capture, and (2) the exclusion of many utterances from domain-specific discourse move classifications, leading to their omission in feedback. To address these challenges, we proposed a multi-perspective discourse analysis that integrates domain-specific talk moves with dialogue act (using the flattened multi-functional SWBD-MASL schema with 43 tags) and discourse relation (applying Segmented Discourse Representation Theory with 16 relations). Our top-down analysis framework enables a comprehensive understanding of utterances that contain talk moves, as well as utterances that do not contain talk moves. This is applied to two mathematics education datasets: TalkMoves (teaching) and SAGA22 (tutoring). Through distributional unigram analysis, sequential talk move analysis, and multi-view deep dive, we discovered meaningful discourse patterns, and revealed the vital role of utterances without talk moves, demonstrating that these utterances, far from being mere fillers, serve crucial functions in guiding, acknowledging, and structuring classroom discourse. These insights underscore the importance of incorporating discourse relations and dialogue acts into AI-assisted education systems to enhance feedback and create more responsive learning environments. Our framework may prove helpful for providing human educator feedback, but also aiding in the development of AI agents that can effectively emulate the roles of both educators and students. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, International Conference on Computers in Education)
    Question-asking is a crucial learning and teaching approach. It reveals different levels of students' understanding, application, and potential misconceptions. Previous studies have categorized question types into higher and lower orders, finding positive and significant associations between higher-order questions and students' critical thinking ability and their learning outcomes in different learning contexts. However, the diversity of higher-order questions, especially in collaborative learning environments. has left open the question of how they may be different from other types of dialogue that emerge from students' conversations, To address these questions, our study utilized natural language processing techniques to build a model and investigate the characteristics of students' higher-order questions. We interpreted these questions using Bloom's taxonomy, and our results reveal three types of higher-order questions during collaborative problem-solving. Students often use Why, How and What If' questions to I) understand the reason and thought process behind their partners' actions: 2) explore and analyze the project by pinpointing the problem: and 3) propose and evaluate ideas or alternative solutions. In addition. we found dialogue labeled 'Social'. 'Question - other', 'Directed at Agent', and 'Confusion/Help Seeking' shows similar underlying patterns to higher-order questions, Our findings provide insight into the different scenarios driving students' higher-order questions and inform the design of adaptive systems to deliver personalized feedback based on students' questions. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email