An official website of the United States government
Abstract Tidal salt marshes produce and emit CH4. Therefore, it is critical to understand the biogeochemical controls that regulate CH4spatial and temporal dynamics in wetlands. The prevailing paradigm assumes that acetoclastic methanogenesis is the dominant pathway for CH4production, and higher salinity concentrations inhibit CH4production in salt marshes. Recent evidence shows that CH4is produced within salt marshes via methylotrophic methanogenesis, a process not inhibited by sulfate reduction. To further explore this conundrum, we performed measurements of soil–atmosphere CH4and CO2fluxes coupled with depth profiles of soil CH4and CO2pore water gas concentrations, stable and radioisotopes, pore water chemistry, and microbial community composition to assess CH4production and fate within a temperate tidal salt marsh. We found unexpectedly high CH4concentrations up to 145,000 μmol mol−1positively correlated with S2−(salinity range: 6.6–14.5 ppt). Despite large CH4production within the soil, soil–atmosphere CH4fluxes were low but with higher emissions and extreme variability during plant senescence (84.3 ± 684.4 nmol m−2 s−1). CH4and CO2within the soil pore water were produced from young carbon, with most Δ14C‐CH4and Δ14C‐CO2values at or above modern. We found evidence that CH4within soils was produced by methylotrophic and hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis. Several pathways exist after CH4is produced, including diffusion into the atmosphere, CH4oxidation, and lateral export to adjacent tidal creeks; the latter being the most likely dominant flux. Our findings demonstrate that CH4production and fluxes are biogeochemically heterogeneous, with multiple processes and pathways that can co‐occur and vary in importance over the year. This study highlights the potential for high CH4production, the need to understand the underlying biogeochemical controls, and the challenges of evaluating CH4budgets and blue carbon in salt marshes.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on February 11, 2026
Unraveling the depth-dependent causal dynamics of methanogenesis and methanotrophy in a high-latitude fen peatland
Abstract The dynamics of methane (CH4) cycling in high-latitude peatlands through different pathways of methanogenesis and methanotrophy are still poorly understood due to the spatiotemporal complexity of microbial activities and biogeochemical processes. Additionally, long-termin situmeasurements within soil columns are limited and associated with large uncertainties in microbial substrates (e.g. dissolved organic carbon, acetate, hydrogen). To better understand CH4cycling dynamics, we first applied an advanced biogeochemical model,ecosys, to explicitly simulate methanogenesis, methanotrophy, and CH4transport in a high-latitude fen (within the Stordalen Mire, northern Sweden). Next, to explore the vertical heterogeneity in CH4cycling, we applied the PCMCI/PCMCI+ causal detection framework with a bootstrap aggregation method to the modeling results, characterizing causal relationships among regulating factors (e.g. temperature, microbial biomass, soil substrate concentrations) through acetoclastic methanogenesis, hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis, and methanotrophy, across three depth intervals (0–10 cm, 10–20 cm, 20–30 cm). Our results indicate that temperature, microbial biomass, and methanogenesis and methanotrophy substrates exhibit significant vertical variations within the soil column. Soil temperature demonstrates strong causal relationships with both biomass and substrate concentrations at the shallower depth (0–10 cm), while these causal relationships decrease significantly at the deeper depth within the two methanogenesis pathways. In contrast, soil substrate concentrations show significantly greater causal relationships with depth, suggesting the substantial influence of substrates on CH4cycling. CH4production is found to peak in August, while CH4oxidation peaks predominantly in October, showing a lag response between production and oxidation. Overall, this research provides important insights into the causal mechanisms modulating CH4cycling across different depths, which will improve carbon cycling predictions, and guide the future field measurement strategies.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2022070
- PAR ID:
- 10593464
- Publisher / Repository:
- IOP Publishing
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Environmental Research Letters
- Volume:
- 20
- Issue:
- 3
- ISSN:
- 1748-9326
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 034005
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Quantifying the temperature sensitivity of methane (CH4) production is crucial for predicting how wetland ecosystems will respond to climate warming. Typically, the temperature sensitivity (often quantified as a Q10value) is derived from laboratory incubation studies and then used in biogeochemical models. However, studies report wide variation in incubation-inferred Q10values, with a large portion of this variation remaining unexplained. Here we applied observations in a thawing permafrost peatland (Stordalen Mire) and a well-tested process-rich model (ecosys) to interpret incubation observations and investigate controls on inferred CH4production temperature sensitivity. We developed a field-storage-incubation modeling approach to mimic the full incubation sequence, including field sampling at a particular time in the growing season, refrigerated storage, and laboratory incubation, followed by model evaluation. We found that CH4production rates during incubation are regulated by substrate availability and active microbial biomass of key microbial functional groups, which are affected by soil storage duration and temperature. Seasonal variation in substrate availability and active microbial biomass of key microbial functional groups led to strong time-of-sampling impacts on CH4production. CH4production is higher with less perturbation post-sampling, i.e. shorter storage duration and lower storage temperature. We found a wide range of inferred Q10values (1.2–3.5), which we attribute to incubation temperatures, incubation duration, storage duration, and sampling time. We also show that Q10values of CH4production are controlled by interacting biological, biochemical, and physical processes, which cause the inferred Q10values to differ substantially from those of the component processes. Terrestrial ecosystem models that use a constant Q10value to represent temperature responses may therefore predict biased soil carbon cycling under future climate scenarios.more » « less
-
Abstract Microbial processes are crucial in producing and oxidizing biological methane (CH4) in natural wetlands. Therefore, modeling methanogenesis and methanotrophy is advantageous for accurately projecting CH4cycling. Utilizing the CLM‐Microbe model, which explicitly represents the growth and death of methanogens and methanotrophs, we demonstrate that genome‐enabled model parameterization improves model performance in four natural wetlands. Compared to the default model parameterization against CH4flux, genomic‐enabled model parameterization added another contain on microbial biomass, notably enhancing the precision of simulated CH4flux. Specifically, the coefficient of determination (R2) increased from 0.45 to 0.74 for Sanjiang Plain, from 0.78 to 0.89 for Changbai Mountain, and from 0.35 to 0.54 for Sallie's Fen, respectively. A drop inR2was observed for the Dajiuhu nature wetland, primarily caused by scatter data points. Theil's coefficient (U) and model efficiency (ME) confirmed the model performance from default parameterization to genome‐enabled model parameterization. Compared with the model solely calibrated to surface CH4flux, additional constraints of functional gene data led to better CH4seasonality; meanwhile, genome‐enabled model parameterization established more robust associations between simulated CH4production rates and environmental factors. Sensitivity analysis underscored the pivotal role of microbial physiology in governing CH4flux. This genome‐enabled model parameterization offers a valuable promise to integrate fast‐cumulating genomic data with CH4models to better understand microbial roles in CH4in the era of climate change.more » « less
-
Abstract The Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) of North America contains millions of small depressional wetlands with some of the highest methane (CH4) fluxes ever reported in terrestrial ecosystems. In saturated soils, two conventional paradigms are (a) methanogenesis is the final step in the redox ladder, occurring only after more thermodynamically favorable electron acceptors (e.g., sulfate) are reduced, and (b) CH4is primarily produced by acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic pathways. However, previous work in PPR wetlands observed co‐occurrence of sulfate‐reduction and methanogenesis and the presence of diverse methanogenic substrates (i.e., methanol, DMS). This study investigated how methylotrophic methanogenesis—in addition to acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis—significantly contributes to CH4flux in surface sediments and thus allows for the co‐occurrence of competing redox processes in PPR sediments. We addressed this aim through field studies in two distinct high CH4emitting wetlands in the PPR complex, which coupled microbial community compositional and functional inferences with depth‐resolved electrochemistry measurements in surficial wetland sediments. This study revealed methylotrophic methanogens as the dominant group of methanogens in the presence of abundant organic sulfate esters, which are likely used for sulfate reduction. Resulting high sulfide concentrations likely caused sulfide toxicity in hydrogenotrophic and acetoclastic methanogens. Additionally, the use of non‐competitive substrates by many methylotrophic methanogens allows these metabolisms to bypass thermodynamic constraints and can explain co‐existence patterns of sulfate‐reduction and methanogenesis. This study demonstrates that the current models of methanogenesis in wetland ecosystems insufficiently represent carbon cycling in some of the highest CH4emitting environments.more » « less
-
Abstract. The recently discovered cryptic methane cycle in the sulfate-reducing zone of marine and wetland sediment couples methylotrophic methanogenesis to anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM). Here we present evidence of cryptic methane cycling activity within the upper regions of the sulfate-reducing zone, along a depth transect within the Santa Barbara Basin, off the coast of California, USA. The top 0–20 cm of sediment from each station was subjected to geochemical analyses and radiotracer incubations using 35S–SO42-, 14C–mono-methylamine, and 14C–CH4 to find evidence of cryptic methane cycling. Methane concentrations were consistently low (3 to 16 µM) across the depth transect, despite AOM rates increasing with decreasing water depth (from max 0.05 nmol cm−3 d−1 at the deepest station to max 1.8 nmol cm−3 d−1 at the shallowest station). Porewater sulfate concentrations remained high (23 to 29 mM), despite the detection of sulfate reduction activity from 35S–SO42- incubations with rates up to 134 nmol cm−3 d−1. Metabolomic analysis showed that substrates for methanogenesis (i.e., acetate, methanol and methylamines) were mostly below the detection limit in the porewater, but some samples from the 1–2 cm depth section showed non-quantifiable evidence of these substrates, indicating their rapid turnover. Estimated methanogenesis from mono-methylamine ranged from 0.2 to 0.5 nmol cm−3 d−1. Discrepancies between the rate constants (k) of methanogenesis (from 14C–mono-methylamine) and AOM (from either 14C–mono-methylamine-derived 14C–CH4 or from directly injected 14C–CH4) suggest the activity of a separate, concurrent metabolic process directly metabolizing mono-methylamine to inorganic carbon. We conclude that the results presented in this work show strong evidence of cryptic methane cycling occurring within the top 20 cm of sediment in the Santa Barbara Basin. The rapid cycling of carbon between methanogenesis and methanotropy likely prevents major build-up of methane in the sulfate-reducing zone. Furthermore, our data suggest that methylamine is utilized by both methanogenic archaea capable of methylotrophic methanogenesis and non-methanogenic microbial groups. We hypothesize that sulfate reduction is responsible for the additional methylamine turnover, but further investigation is needed to elucidate this metabolic activity.more » « less
