An official website of the United States government
On a finite probability space, we consider the problem of fair pricing of contingent claims and its sensitivity to a distortion of information, where we follow the weak information modeling approach. We show that, in complete models, or more generally, for replicable contingent claims, the weak information does not affect the fair price. For incomplete models, this is not the case for non-replicable claims, where we obtain explicit formulas for the information premium and correction to an optimal trading strategy. We illustrate our results by an example, where we demon- strate that under weak information, the fair price can increase, stay the same, or decrease. Finally, we perform the stability analysis for the information premium and the correction of the optimal trading strategy to perturbations of the contingent claim payoff, stock price dynamics, and the reference probability measure.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on April 28, 2026
Representation of indifference prices on a finite probability space
On a finite probability space, we consider the problem of indifference pricing of contingent claims, where the preferences of an economic agent are modeled by an Inada utility stochastic field — the interior of its effective domain being (a,∞) — for some a∈R∪{−∞}. This allows for including utilities on both R and R+. We consider arbitrary contingent claims and show that, for replicable ones, the indifference price equals the initial value of the replicating strategy and thus depends neither on the agent’s initial wealth, for which the indifference pricing problem is well-posed, nor the utility stochastic field. This, in particular, shows the consistency of the indifference and arbitrage-free pricing methodologies for complete models. For nonreplicable claims, we show that the indifference price is equal to the expectation of the discounted payoff under the dual-optimal measure, which is equivalent to the reference probability measure. In particular, we demonstrate that the indifference price is unique for every choice of a smooth Inada utility stochastic field and initial wealth in (a,∞). Our proofs rely on the change of numéraire technique and a reformulation of the indifference pricing problem. The advantages of the settings of this paper and the approach allow for bypassing the technicalities and issues related to choosing the notion of admissibility and for including a wide range of utilities, including stochastic ones. We augment the results with examples.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1848339
- PAR ID:
- 10594298
- Publisher / Repository:
- Mathematical Sciences Publishers
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Involve, a Journal of Mathematics
- Volume:
- 18
- Issue:
- 3
- ISSN:
- 1944-4176
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 495 to 516
- Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
- indifference pricing, incomplete markets, duality, numeraire.
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
We consider the problem of pricing in a large market, which arises as a limit of small markets within which there are finitely many traded assets. We show that this framework allows accommodating both marginal-utility-based prices (for stochastic utilities) and arbitrage-free prices. Adopting a stochastic integration theory with respect to a sequence of semimartingales, we introduce the notion of marginal-utility-based prices for the large (post-limit) market and establish their existence, uniqueness, and relation to arbitrage-free prices. These results rely on a theorem of independent interest on utility maximisation with a random endowment in a large market that we state and prove first. Further, we provide approximation results for the marginal utility-based and arbitrage-free prices in the large market by those in small markets. In particular, our framework allows pricing asymptotically replicable claims, where we also show consistency in the pricing methodologies and provide positive examples.more » « less
-
In this paper, we consider a stock that follows a geometric Brownian motion (GBM) and a riskless asset continuously compounded at a constant rate. We assume that the stock can go bankrupt, i.e. lose all of its value, at some exogenous random time (independent of the stock price) modeled as the first arrival time of a homogeneous Poisson process. For this setup, we study Merton’s optimal portfolio problem consisting in maximizing the expected isoelastic utility of the total wealth at a given finite maturity time. We obtain an analytical solution using coupled Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman (HJB) equations. The optimal strategy bans borrowing and never allocates more wealth into the stock than the classical Merton ratio recommends. For nonlogarithmic isoelastic utilities, the optimal weights are nonmyopic. This is an example where a realistic problem, being merely a slight modification of the usual GBM model, leads to nonmyopic weights. For logarithmic utility, we additionally present an alternative derivation using a stochastic integral and verify that the weights obtained are identical to our first approach. We also present an example for our strategy applied to a stock with nonzero bankruptcy probability.more » « less
-
We consider a fundamental pricing model in which a fixed number of units of a reusable resource are used to serve customers. Customers arrive to the system according to a stochastic process and, upon arrival, decide whether to purchase the service, depending on their willingness to pay and the current price. The service time during which the resource is used by the customer is stochastic, and the firm may incur a service cost. This model represents various markets for reusable resources, such as cloud computing, shared vehicles, rotable parts, and hotel rooms. In the present paper, we analyze this pricing problem when the firm attempts to maximize a weighted combination of three central metrics: profit, market share, and service level. Under Poisson arrivals, exponential service times, and standard assumptions on the willingness-to-pay distribution, we establish a series of results that characterize the performance of static pricing in such environments. In particular, although an optimal policy is fully dynamic in such a context, we prove that a static pricing policy simultaneously guarantees 78.9% of the profit, market share, and service level from the optimal policy. Notably, this result holds for any service rate and number of units the firm operates. Our proof technique relies on a judicious construction of a static price that is derived directly from the optimal dynamic pricing policy. In the special case in which there are two units and the induced demand is linear, we also prove that the static policy guarantees 95.5% of the profit from the optimal policy. Our numerical findings on a large test bed of instances suggest that the latter result is quite indicative of the profit obtained by the static pricing policy across all parameters.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)We study the power of selling opaque products, that is, products where a feature (such as color) is hidden from the customer until after purchase. Opaque products, which are sold with a price discount, have emerged as a powerful vehicle to increase revenue for many online retailers and service providers that offer horizontally differentiated items. In the opaque selling models we consider, all of the items are sold at a single common price alongside opaque products that may correspond to various subsets of the items. We consider two types of customers, risk-neutral ones, who assume they will receive a truly random item of the opaque product, and pessimistic ones, who assume they will receive their least favorite item of the opaque product. We benchmark opaque selling against two common selling strategies: discriminatory pricing, where one explicitly charges different prices for each item, and single pricing, where a single price is charged for all the items. We give a sharp characterization of when opaque selling outperforms discriminatory pricing; namely, this result holds for situations where all customers are pessimistic or the item valuations are supported on two points. In the latter case, we also show that opaque selling with just one opaque product guarantees at least 71.9% of the revenue from discriminatory pricing. We then provide upper bounds on the potential revenue increase from opaque selling strategies over single pricing and describe cases where the increase can be significantly more than that of discriminatory pricing. Finally, we provide pricing algorithms and conduct an extensive numerical study to assess the power of opaque selling for a variety valuation distributions and model extensions. This paper was accepted by Gabriel Weintraub, revenue management and market analytics.more » « less
