An official website of the United States government
Abstract Rapid urbanization and escalating climate change impacts have heightened stormwater-related concerns (e.g., pluvial flooding) in cities. Understanding catchment dynamics and characteristics, including precise catchment mapping, is essential to accurate surface water monitoring and management. Traditionally, topography is the primary data set used to model surface water flow dynamics in undisturbed natural landscapes. However, urban systems also contain stormwater drainage infrastructure, which can alter catchment boundaries and runoff behavior. Acknowledging both natural and built environmental influences, this study introduces three GIS-based approaches to enhance urban catchment mapping: (1) Modifying DEM elevations at inlet locations; (2) Adjusting DEM elevations along pipeline paths; (3) Applying the QGRASS plug-in to systematically incorporate infrastructure data. Our evaluation using the geographical Friedman test (p > 0.05) and Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC = 0.80) confirms the statistical and spatial consistency among the studying methods. Coupled with onsite flow direction validation, these results support the feasibility and reliability of integrating elements of nature and built infrastructure in urban catchment mapping. The refined mapping approaches explored in this study offer improved and more accurate and efficient urban drainage catchment zoning, beyond using elevation and topographic data alone. Likewise, these methods bolster predictive stormwater management at catchment scales, ultimately strengthening urban stormwater and flooding resilience.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on June 4, 2026
Internet of Things‐Based Framework Application at a University Campus Scale: Linking Smart Monitoring Systems and Stormwater Management
Urban stormwater management is increasingly a challenge due to land use change, aging infrastructure, and climate‐driven precipitation variability. Likewise, maintaining regulatory compliance for stormwater permits is becoming more difficult. This study develops and deploys stormwater sensors using an Internet of Things‐based monitoring framework on the University of Maryland campus, a spatially compact but land use diverse testbed, designed to support both compliance and adaptive planning. Across three campus outfalls for stormwater quantity and quality data collection, the study investigates how hyperlocal precipitation and catchment characteristics affect stormwater flow and identifies key patterns in stormwater flow and quality through continuous monitoring. Findings reveal correlations between runoff behaviors and catchment characteristics (i.e., imperviousness) and highlight site‐specific associations between runoff flow and water quality indicators (pH, turbidity, conductivity, and dissolved oxygen). These associations can be leveraged as indicators of flood and pollution risk for management and planning purposes. This study also explores the role of campus stakeholders in guiding a “smart” system design, deployment, and big data use and outlines adaptive and preventive strategies for mitigating field deployment challenges and optimizing system performance that is a practical, compliance‐oriented model for smart stormwater monitoring in complex urban settings at various scales.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1828910
- PAR ID:
- 10601100
- Publisher / Repository:
- Advanced Intelligent Discovery
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Advanced Intelligent Discovery
- ISSN:
- 2943-9981
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Computer simulation models are a useful tool in planning, enabling reliable yet affordable what-if scenario analysis. Many simulation models have been proposed and used for urban planning and management. Still, there are a few modeling options available for the purpose of evaluating the effects of various stormwater control measures (SCM), including LID (low-impact development) controls (green roof, rain garden, porous pavement, rainwater harvesting), upland off-line controls (sedimentation, filtration, retention–irrigation) and online controls (detention, wet pond). We explored the utility and potential of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) as a modeling tool for urban stormwater planning and management. This study demonstrates how the hydrologic modeling strategies of SWAT and recent enhancements could help to develop efficient measures for solving urban stormwater issues. The case studies presented in this paper focus on urban watersheds in the City of Austin (COA), TX, where rapid urbanization and population growth have put pressure on the urban stormwater system. Using the enhanced SWAT, COA developed a framework to assess the impacts on erosion, flooding, and aquatic life due to changes in runoff characteristics associated with land use changes. Five catchments in Austin were modeled to test the validity of the SWAT enhancements and the analytical framework. These case studies demonstrate the efficacy of using SWAT and the COA framework to evaluate the impacts of changes in hydrology and the effects of different regulatory schemes.more » « less
-
Floods are amplified and attenuated by features and processes across spatial scales, defined here as flood dynamics. We review and synthesise these influences at the catchment, river network and reach scales as a means of integrating understanding of controls on flood dynamics and identifying key questions that arise because of differences in techniques of investigation and disciplinary emphases between spatial scales. Catchment‐scale influences include catchment area, topography, lithology, land cover, precipitation, antecedent conditions and human alterations such as changing land cover. Network‐scale influences on flood dynamics include network topology, longitudinal variations in the geometry of successive river corridor reaches, lakes and wetlands and human alterations including flow regulation and cumulative changes in channel‐floodplain connectivity in multiple reaches across a network. Reach‐scale influences on flood dynamics include water sources, river corridor geometry and connectivity and human alterations such as artificial levees, channelisation, bank stabilisation, changes to floodplain land cover and drainage, dike operation, process‐based river restoration and urban stormwater management. Our review and synthesis of relevant literature suggest that the relative importance of these multiple influences on flood dynamics varies across spatial scales. Hillslope response may dominate hydrograph characteristics in smaller catchments, for example, whereas network geometry and flow dynamics exert progressively stronger influences on flood dynamics with increasing catchment size. Scale‐specific advances in understanding flood dynamics, including rainfall‐runoff analyses of water movements from uplands into channel networks (catchment‐scale), analyses of flow dynamics along networks of multiple channel reaches (network‐scale) and investigations of biophysical feedbacks and the influences of river corridor geometry and hydraulic roughness (reach‐scale), have largely contributed to understanding flood dynamics, but there remain important disconnects between these diverse bodies of research and outstanding questions related to the cumulative effects on flood dynamics across scales.more » « less
-
“Smart” water systems are transforming the field of stormwater management by enabling real-time monitoring and control of previously static infrastructure. While the localized benefits of active control are well-established, the potential for system-scale control of watersheds is poorly understood. This study shows how a real-world smart stormwater system can be leveraged to shape streamflow within an urban watershed. Specifically, we coordinate releases from two internet-controlled stormwater basins to achieve desired control objectives downstream—such as maintaining the flow at a set-point, and generating interleaved waves. In the first part of the study, we describe the construction of the control network using a low-cost, open-source hardware stack and a cloud-based controller scheduling application. Next, we characterize the system’s control capabilities by determining the travel times, decay times, and magnitudes of various waves released from the upstream retention basins. With this characterization in hand, we use the system to generate two desired responses at a critical downstream junction. First, we generate a set-point hydrograph, in which flow is maintained at an approximately constant rate. Next, we generate a series of overlapping and interleaved waves using timed releases from both retention basins. We discuss how these control strategies can be used to stabilize flows, thereby mitigating streambed erosion and reducing contaminant loads into downstream waterbodies.more » « less
-
Integrating the Spatial Configurations of Green and Gray Infrastructure in Urban Stormwater NetworksAbstract Green infrastructure (GI) practices improve stormwater quality and reduce urban flooding, but as urban hydrology is highly controlled by its associated gray infrastructure (e.g., stormwater pipe network), GI's watershed‐scale performance depends on its siting within its associated watershed. Although many stormwater practitioners have begun considering GI's spatial configuration within a larger watershed, few approaches allow for flexible scenario exploration, which can untangle GI's interaction with gray infrastructure network and assess its effects on watershed hydrology. To address the gap in integrated gray‐green infrastructure planning, we used an exploratory model to examine gray‐green infrastructure performance using synthetic stormwater networks with varying degrees of flow path meandering, informed by analysis on stormwater networks from the Minneapolis‐St. Paul Metropolitan Area, MN, USA. Superimposed with different coverage and placements of GI (e.g., bioretention cells), these gray‐green stormwater networks are then subjected to different rainfall intensities within Environmental Protection Agency's Storm Water Management Model to simulate their hydrological benefits (e.g., peak flow reduction, flood reduction). Although only limited choices of green and gray infrastructure were explored, the results show that the gray infrastructure's spatial configuration can introduce tradeoffs between increased peak flow and increased flooding, and further interacts with GI coverage and placement to reduce peak flow and flooding at low rainfall intensity. However, as rainfall intensifies, GI ceases to reduce peak flow. For integrated gray‐green infrastructure planning, our results suggest that physical constraints of the stormwater networks and the range of rainfall intensities must be considered when implementing GI.more » « less
