skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


This content will become publicly available on June 1, 2026

Title: A wild bumble bee shows intraspecific differences in sensitivity to multiple pesticides
Wild pollinator declines are increasingly linked to pesticide exposure, yet it is unclear how intraspecific differences contribute to observed variation in sensitivity, and the role gut microbes play in the sensitivity of wild bees is largely unexplored. Here, we investigate site-level differences in survival and microbiome structure of a wild bumble bee exposed to multiple pesticides, both individually and in combination. We collected wildBombus vosnesenskiiforagers (N= 175) from an alpine meadow, a valley lake shoreline and a suburban park and maintained them on a diet containing a herbicide (glyphosate), a fungicide (tebuconazole), an insecticide (imidacloprid) or a combination of these chemicals. Alpine bees had the highest overall survival, followed by shoreline bees then suburban bees. This was in part explained by body size differences across sites and the presence of conopid parasitoids at two of the sites. Notably, site of origin impacted bee survival on the herbicide, fungicide and combination treatment. We did not find evidence of gut microbiome differences across pesticide treatment, nor a site-by-treatment interaction. Regardless, the survival differences we observed emphasize the importance of considering population of origin when studying pesticide toxicity of wild bees.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1846266
PAR ID:
10616375
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Royal Society Open Science
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Royal Society Open Science
Volume:
12
Issue:
6
ISSN:
2054-5703
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; (, mSystems)
    Gilbert, Jack A (Ed.)
    ABSTRACT Bacteria and archaea employ a rudimentary immune system, CRISPR-Cas, to protect against foreign genetic elements such as bacteriophage. CRISPR-Cas systems are found inBombella apis.B. apisis an important honey bee symbiont, found primarily in larvae, queens, and hive compartments.B. apisis found in the worker bee gut but is not considered a core member of the bee microbiome and has therefore been understudied with regard to its importance in the honey bee colony. However,B. apisappears to play beneficial roles in the colony, by protecting developing brood from fungal pathogens and by bolstering their development under nutritional stress. Previously, we identified CRISPR-Cas systems as being acquired byB. apisin its transition to bee association, as they are absent in a sister clade. Here, we assess the variation and distribution of CRISPR-Cas types acrossB. apisstrains. We found multiple CRISPR-Cas types, some of which have multiple arrays, within the sameB. apisgenomes and also in the honey bee queen gut metagenomes. We analyzed the spacers between strains to identify the history of mobile element interaction for eachB. apisstrain. Finally, we predict interactions between viral sequences and CRISPR systems from different honey bee microbiome members. Our analyses show that theB. apisCRISPR-Cas systems are dynamic; that microbes in the same niche have unique spacers, which supports the functionality of these CRISPR-Cas systems; and that acquisition of new spacers may be occurring in multiple locations in the genome, allowing for a flexible antiviral arsenal for the microbe. IMPORTANCEHoney bee worker gut microbes have been implicated in everything from protection from pathogens to breakdown of complex polysaccharides in the diet. However, there are multiple niches within a honey bee colony that host different groups of microbes, including the acetic acid bacteriumBombella apis.B. apisis found in the colony food stores, in association with brood, in worker hypopharyngeal glands, and in the queen’s digestive tract. The roles thatB. apismay serve in these environments are just beginning to be discovered and include the production of a potent antifungal that protects developing bees and supplementation of dietary lysine to young larvae, bolstering their nutrition. Niche specificity inB. apismay be affected by the pressures of bacteriophage and other mobile elements, which may target different strains in each specific bee environment. Studying the interplay betweenB. apisand its mobile genetic elements (MGEs) may help us better understand microbial community dynamics within the colony and the potential ramifications for the honey bee host. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; (, Journal of Applied Ecology)
    Abstract Most pesticide research has focussed on risk to managed honeybees, but other managed and wild bees are also exposed to pesticides. Critically, we know little about the magnitude and sources of risk to honeybees compared with other bees during crop pollination.To compare pesticide exposure and risk across wild and managed bees, we sampled the main bee groups present during bloom in 20 apple orchards, including managed honeybees (Apis mellifera), managed bumblebee workers (Bombus impatiens), wild mining bees (Andrenaspp. andAndrena [Melandrena]spp.), bumblebee foundress queens (Bombus impatiens) and eastern carpenter bees (Xylocopa virginica). We screened all bees for 92 pesticides and computed a Risk Quotient using available toxicity data (honeybee LD50s), adjusting for differences in toxicity known to scale with body mass. To gain insight into exposure origin, we compared residues in bees to those in focal orchard apple and dandelion flowers.Nearly all bee samples contained pesticides (95%), with the average contamination level ranging from 7.1 ± 2.8 parts per billion (ppb) inB. impatiensworkers to 388.4 ± 146.2 ppb inAndrena. Exposure profiles were similar for all bees exceptA. mellifera, whose unique exposure profile included high levels of the neonicotinoid insecticide thiamethoxam.All bee groups except wildB. impatiensqueens had at least one sample exceeding a US Environmental Protection Agency or European Food Safety Authority exposure level of concern.Apis melliferaexperienced significantly greater risk than other bee groups, with 63% and 81% of samples exceeding an acute or chronic exposure level of concern, respectively. Risk to honeybees was driven primarily by high thiamethoxam levels not found in focal orchard flowers and likely originating outside the orchard.Synthesis and applications: We find that pesticide exposure and risk differ between honeybees and other managed and wild bees during apple pollination. Furthermore, pesticide exposure is a landscape‐scale phenomenon and therefore measures to reduce exposure must consider the surroundings beyond focal farms. Limiting orchard sprays, while reducing on‐farm exposures, will not protect far‐foraging bees from off‐farm exposures such as thiamethoxam, which we hypothesize is coming from nearby seed‐treated corn fields planted during apple bloom. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; ; ; (, mBio)
    Kaltenpoth, Martin (Ed.)
    ABSTRACT Mechanistic understanding of interactions in many host-microbe systems, including the honey bee microbiome, is limited by a lack of easy-to-use genome engineering approaches. To this end, we demonstrate a one-step genome engineering approach for making gene deletions and insertions in the chromosomes of honey bee gut bacterial symbionts. Electroporation of linear or non-replicating plasmid DNA containing an antibiotic resistance cassette flanked by regions with homology to a symbiont genome reliably results in chromosomal integration. This lightweight approach does not require expressing any exogenous recombination machinery. The high concentrations of large DNAs with long homology regions needed to make the process efficient can be readily produced using modern DNA synthesis and assembly methods. We use this approach to knock out genes, including genes involved in biofilm formation, and insert fluorescent protein genes into the chromosome of the betaproteobacterial bee gut symbiontSnodgrassella alvi. We are also able to engineer the genomes of multiple strains ofS. alviand another species,Snodgrassella communis, which is found in the bumble bee gut microbiome. Finally, we use the same method to engineer the chromosome of another bee symbiont,Bartonella apis, which is an alphaproteobacterium. As expected, gene knockout inS. alviusing this approach isrecA-dependent, suggesting that this straightforward procedure can be applied to other microbes that lack convenient genome engineering methods. IMPORTANCEHoney bees are ecologically and economically important crop pollinators with bacterial gut symbionts that influence their health. Microbiome-based strategies for studying or improving bee health have utilized wild-type or plasmid-engineered bacteria. We demonstrate that a straightforward, single-step method can be used to insert cassettes and replace genes in the chromosomes of multiple bee gut bacteria. This method can be used for investigating the mechanisms of host-microbe interactions in the bee gut community and stably engineering symbionts that benefit pollinator health. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; (, Animal Microbiome)
    Abstract BackgroundHoney bees are not only essential for pollination services, but are also economically important as a source of hive products (e.g., honey, royal jelly, pollen, wax, and propolis) that are used as foods, cosmetics, and alternative medicines. Royal jelly is a popular honey bee product with multiple potential medicinal properties. To boost royal jelly production, a long-term genetic selection program of Italian honey bees (ITBs) in China has been performed, resulting in honey bee stocks (here referred to as RJBs) that produce an order of magnitude more royal jelly than ITBs. Although multiple studies have investigated the molecular basis of increased royal jelly yields, one factor that has not been considered is the role of honey bee-associated gut microbes. ResultsBased on the behavioral, morphological, physiological, and neurological differences between RJBs and ITBs, we predicted that the gut microbiome composition of RJBs bees would differ from ITBs. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the bacterial composition of RJB and ITB workers from an urban location and RJBs from a rural location in China. Based on 16S rRNA gene profiling, we did not find any evidence that RJBs possess a unique bacterial gut community when compared to ITBs. However, we observed differences between honey bees from the urban versus rural sites. ConclusionsOur results suggest that the environmental factors rather than stock differences are more important in shaping the bacterial composition in honey bee guts. Further studies are needed to investigate if the observed differences in relative abundance of taxa between the urban and rural bees correspond to distinct functional capabilities that impact honey bee health. Because the lifestyle, diet, and other environmental variables are different in rural and urban areas, controlled studies are needed to determine which of these factors are responsible for the observed differences in gut bacterial composition between urban and rural honeybees. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; (, Applied and Environmental Microbiology)
    Tortosa, Pablo (Ed.)
    ABSTRACT Social bees have been extensively studied for their gut microbial functions, but the significance of the gut microbiota in solitary bees remains less explored. Solitary bee,Megachile rotundatafemales provision their offspring with pollen from various plant species, harboring a diverse microbial community that colonizes larvae guts. TheApilactobacillusis the most abundant microbe, but evidence concerning the effects ofApilactobacillusand other provision microbes on growth and survival are lacking. We hypothesized that the presence ofApilactobacillusin abundance would enhance larval and prepupal development, weight, and survival, while the absence of intact microbial communities was expected to have a negative impact on bee fitness. We reared larvae on pollen provisions with naturally collected microbial communities (Natural pollen) or devoid of microbial communities (Sterile pollen). We also assessed the impact of introducingApilactobacillus micheneriby adding it to both types of pollen provisions. Feeding larvae with sterile pollen +A. micheneriled to the highest mortality rate, followed by natural pollen +A. micheneri, and sterile pollen. Larval development was significantly delayed in groups fed with sterile pollen. Interestingly, larval and prepupal weights did not significantly differ across treatments compared to natural pollen-fed larvae. 16S rRNA gene sequencing found a dominance ofSodalis, whenA. micheneriwas introduced to natural pollen. The presence ofSodaliswith abundantA. micheneri suggests potential crosstalk between both, shaping bee nutrition and health. Hence, this study highlights that the reliance on nonhost-specific environmental bacteria may not impact fitness ofM. rotundata.IMPORTANCEThis study investigates the impact of environmentally acquired gut microbes of solitary bee fitness with insights into the microbial ecology of bee and their health. While the symbiotic microbiome is well-studied in social bees, the role of environmental acquired microbiota in solitary bees remains unclear. Assessing this relationship in a solitary pollinator, the leaf-cutting bee,Megachile rotundata, we discovered that this bee species does not depend on the diverse environmental bacteria found in pollen for either its larval growth or survival. Surprisingly, high concentrations of the most abundant pollen bacteria, Apilactobacillus micheneridid not consistently benefit bee fitness, but caused larval mortality. Our findings also suggest an interaction betweenApilactobacillusand theSodalisand perhaps their role in bee nutrition. Hence, this study provides significant insights that contribute to understanding the fitness, conservation, and pollination ecology of other solitary bee species in the future. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email