An official website of the United States government
ABSTRACT Genetic technologies such as DNA barcoding make it easier and less expensive to monitor biodiversity and its associated ecosystem services, particularly in biodiversity hotspots where traditional assessments are challenging. Successful use of these data‐driven technologies, however, requires access to appropriate reference data. We reviewed the >373,584 reference plant DNA barcodes in public repositories and found that they cumulatively cover a remarkable quarter of the ~435,000 extant land plant species (Embryophyta). Nevertheless, coverage gaps in tropical biodiversity hotspots reflect well‐documented biases in biodiversity science – most reference specimens originated in the Global North. Currently, at least 17% of plant families lack any reference barcode data whatsoever, affecting tropical and temperate regions alike. Investigators often emphasise the importance of marker choice and the need to ensure protocols are technically capable of detecting and identifying a broad range of taxa. Yet persistent geographic and taxonomic gaps in the reference datasets show that these protocols rely upon risk undermining all downstream applications of the strategy, ranging from basic biodiversity monitoring to policy‐relevant objectives – such as the forensic authentication of materials in illegal trade. Future networks of investigators could work strategically to improve data coverage, which will be essential in global efforts to conserve biodiversity while advancing more fair and equitable access to benefits arising from genetic resources.
more »
« less
Beyond a few bases: methods for large DNA insertion and gene targeting in plants
SUMMARY Genome editing technologies like CRISPR/Cas have greatly accelerated the pace of both fundamental research and translational applications in agriculture. However, many plant biologists are functionally limited to creating small, targeted DNA changes or large, random DNA insertions. The ability to efficiently generate large, yet precise, DNA changes will massively accelerate crop breeding cycles, enabling researchers to more efficiently engineer crops amidst a rapidly changing agricultural landscape. This review provides an overview of existing technologies that allow plant biologists to integrate large DNA sequences within a plant host and some associated technical bottlenecks. Additionally, this review explores a selection of emerging techniques in other host systems to inspire tool development in plants.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10620936
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley-Blackwell
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- The Plant Journal
- Volume:
- 121
- Issue:
- 6
- ISSN:
- 0960-7412
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
SUMMARY Cis‐regulatory elements (CREs) are important sequences for gene expression and for plant biological processes such as development, evolution, domestication, and stress response. However, studying CREs in plant genomes has been challenging. The totipotent nature of plant cells, coupled with the inability to maintain plant cell types in culture and the inherent technical challenges posed by the cell wall has limited our understanding of how plant cell types acquire and maintain their identities and respond to the environment via CRE usage. Advances in single‐cell epigenomics have revolutionized the field of identifying cell‐type‐specific CREs. These new technologies have the potential to significantly advance our understanding of plant CRE biology, and shed light on how the regulatory genome gives rise to diverse plant phenomena. However, there are significant biological and computational challenges associated with analyzing single‐cell epigenomic datasets. In this review, we discuss the historical and foundational underpinnings of plant single‐cell research, challenges, and common pitfalls in the analysis of plant single‐cell epigenomic data, and highlight biological challenges unique to plants. Additionally, we discuss how the application of single‐cell epigenomic data in various contexts stands to transform our understanding of the importance of CREs in plant genomes.more » « less
-
Several species of the Agrobacterium genus represent unique bacterial pathogens able to genetically transform plants, by transferring and integrating a segment of their own DNA (T-DNA, transferred DNA) in their host genome. Whereas in nature this process results in uncontrolled growth of the infected plant cells (“tumors”), this capability of Agrobacterium has been widely used as a crucial tool to generate transgenic plants, for research and biotechnology. The virulence of Agrobacterium relies on a series of virulence genes, mostly encoded on a large plasmid (Ti-plasmid, tumor inducing plasmid), involved in the different steps of the DNA transfer to the host cell genome: activation of bacterial virulence, synthesis and export of the T-DNA and its associated proteins, intracellular trafficking of the T-DNA and effector proteins in the host cell, and integration of the T-DNA in the host genomic DNA. Multiple interactions between these bacterial encoded proteins and host factors occur during the infection process, which determine the outcome of the infection. Here, we review our current knowledge of the mechanisms by which bacterial and plant factors control Agrobacterium virulence and host plant susceptibility.more » « less
-
Heck, Michelle (Ed.)ABSTRACT Plant-associated microbial assemblages are known to shift at time scales aligned with plant phenology, as influenced by the changes in plant-derived nutrient concentrations and abiotic conditions observed over a growing season. But these same factors can change dramatically in a sub-24-hour period, and it is poorly understood how such diel cycling may influence plant-associated microbiomes. Plants respond to the change from day to night via mechanisms collectively referred to as the internal “clock,” and clock phenotypes are associated with shifts in rhizosphere exudates and other changes that we hypothesize could affect rhizosphere microbes. The mustardBoechera strictahas wild populations that contain multiple clock phenotypes of either a 21- or a 24-hour cycle. We grew plants of both phenotypes (two genotypes per phenotype) in incubators that simulated natural diel cycling or that maintained constant light and temperature. Under both cycling and constant conditions, the extracted DNA concentration and the composition of rhizosphere microbial assemblages differed between time points, with daytime DNA concentrations often triple what were observed at night and microbial community composition differing by, for instance, up to 17%. While we found that plants of different genotypes were associated with variation in rhizosphere assemblages, we did not see an effect on soil conditioned by a particular host plant circadian phenotype on subsequent generations of plants. Our results suggest that rhizosphere microbiomes are dynamic at sub-24-hour periods, and those dynamics are shaped by diel cycling in host plant phenotype. IMPORTANCEWe find that the rhizosphere microbiome shifts in composition and extractable DNA concentration in sub-24-hour periods as influenced by the plant host’s internal clock. These results suggest that host plant clock phenotypes could be an important determinant of variation in rhizosphere microbiomes.more » « less
-
Abstract MucR belongs to a large protein family whose members regulate the expression of virulence and symbiosis genes in α‐proteobacteria species. This protein and its homologs were initially studied as classical transcriptional regulators mostly involved in repression of target genes by binding their promoters. Very recent studies have led to the classification of MucR as a new type of Histone‐like Nucleoid Structuring (H‐NS) protein. Thus this review is an effort to put together a complete and unifying story demonstrating how genetic and biochemical findings on MucR suggested that this protein is not a classical transcriptional regulator, but functions as a novel type of H‐NS‐like protein, which binds AT‐rich regions of genomic DNA and regulates gene expression.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.70099
