An official website of the United States government
Abstract Southern Ocean surface cooling and Antarctic sea ice expansion from 1979 through 2015 have been linked both to changing atmospheric circulation and melting of Antarctica's grounded ice and ice shelves. However, climate models have largely been unable to reproduce this behavior. Here we examine the contribution of observed wind variability and Antarctic meltwater to Southern Ocean sea surface temperature (SST) and Antarctic sea ice. The free‐running, CMIP6‐class GISS‐E2.1‐G climate model can simulate regional cooling and neutral sea ice trends due to internal variability, but they are unlikely. Constraining the model to observed winds and meltwater fluxes from 1990 through 2021 gives SST variability and trends consistent with observations. Meltwater and winds contribute a similar amount to the SST trend, and winds contribute more to the sea ice trend than meltwater. However, while the constrained model captures much of the observed sea ice variability, it only partially captures the post‐2015 sea ice reduction.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on February 16, 2026
Clouds Are Crucial to Capture Antarctic Sea Ice Variability
Abstract Models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 (CMIP6) typically struggle to reproduce observed Antarctic sea ice trends, a bias that is substantially alleviated when constraining winds. We use wind‐nudged simulations from two CMIP models to investigate the influence of clouds on sea ice area (SIA). We find that nudging model winds in coupled simulations toward reanalysis, in addition to improving SIA variability, is crucial to reproduce realistic anomalies in cloud radiative effect (CRE) and cloud cover. Biases in the variability of cloud properties at sea ice edge—characterized by CRE anomalies—help explain the remaining discrepancies between simulated and observed SIA; a bias of 1 in the CRE anomaly corresponds to a negative bias of 0.43 in SIA anomaly. Finally, we find that most CMIP6 models show positive trends in CRE anomaly biases, which should contribute to enhanced SIA decline, a long‐standing bias in CMIP models.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10624109
- Publisher / Repository:
- AGU
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Volume:
- 52
- Issue:
- 3
- ISSN:
- 0094-8276
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Biomass burning can affect climate via the emission of aerosols and their subsequent impact on radiation, cloud microphysics, and surface and atmospheric albedo. Biomass burning emissions (BBEs) over the boreal region have strongly increased during the last decade and are expected to continue increasing as the climate warms. Climate models simulate aerosol processes, yet historical and future Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) simulations have no active fire component, and BBEs are prescribed as external forcings. Here, we show that CMIP6 used future boreal BBEs scenarios with unrealistic near-zero trends that have a large impact on climate trends. By running sensitivity experiments with ramped up boreal emissions based on observed trends, we find that increasing boreal BBEs reduces global warming by 12% and Arctic warming by 38%, reducing the loss of sea ice. Tropical precipitation shifts southward as a result of the hemispheric difference in boreal aerosol forcing and subsequent temperature response. These changes stem from the impact of aerosols on clouds, increasing cloud droplet number concentration, cloud optical depth, and low cloud cover, ultimately reducing surface shortwave flux over northern latitudes. Our results highlight the importance of realistic boreal BBEs in climate model simulations and the need for improved understanding of boreal emission trends and aerosol–climate interactions.more » « less
-
Abstract The variability of Arctic sea ice extent (SIE) on interannual and multidecadal time scales is examined in 29 models with historical forcing participating in phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) and in twentieth-century sea ice reconstructions. Results show that during the historical period with low external forcing (1850–1919), CMIP6 models display relatively good agreement in their representation of interannual sea ice variability (IVSIE) but exhibit pronounced intermodel spread in multidecadal sea ice variability (MVSIE), which is overestimated with respect to sea ice reconstructions and is dominated by model uncertainty in sea ice simulation in the subpolar North Atlantic. We find that this is associated with differences in models’ sensitivity to Northern Hemispheric sea surface temperatures (SSTs). Additionally, we show that while CMIP6 models are generally capable of simulating multidecadal changes in Arctic sea ice from the mid-twentieth century to present day, they tend to underestimate the observed sea ice decline during the early twentieth-century warming (ETCW; 1915–45). These results suggest the need for an improved characterization of the sea ice response to multidecadal climate variability in order to address the sources of model bias and reduce the uncertainty in future projections arising from intermodel spread. Significance StatementThe credibility of Arctic sea ice predictions depends on whether climate models are capable of reproducing changes in the past climate, including patterns of sea ice variability which can mask or amplify the response to global warming. This study aims to better understand how latest-generation global climate models simulate interannual and multidecadal variability of Arctic sea ice relative to available observations. We find that models differ in their representation of multidecadal sea ice variability, which is overall larger than in observations. Additionally, models underestimate the sea ice decline during the period of observed warming between 1915 and 1945. Our results suggest that, to achieve better predictions of Arctic sea ice, the realism of low-frequency sea ice variability in models should be improved.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Abstract Antarctic sea ice extent (SIE) has slightly increased over the satellite observational period (1979 to the present) despite global warming. Several mechanisms have been invoked to explain this trend, such as changes in winds, precipitation, or ocean stratification, yet there is no widespread consensus. Additionally, fully coupled Earth system models run under historic and anthropogenic forcing generally fail to simulate positive SIE trends over this time period. In this work, we quantify the role of winds and Southern Ocean SSTs on sea ice trends and variability with an Earth system model run under historic and anthropogenic forcing that nudges winds over the polar regions and Southern Ocean SSTs north of the sea ice to observations from 1979 to 2018. Simulations with nudged winds alone capture the observed interannual variability in SIE and the observed long-term trends from the early 1990s onward, yet for the longer 1979–2018 period they simulate a negative SIE trend, in part due to faster-than-observed warming at the global and hemispheric scale in the model. Simulations with both nudged winds and SSTs show no significant SIE trends over 1979–2018, in agreement with observations. At the regional scale, simulated sea ice shows higher skill compared to the pan-Antarctic scale both in capturing trends and interannual variability in all nudged simulations. We additionally find negligible impact of the initial conditions in 1979 on long-term trends.more » « less
-
Abstract The Southern Ocean is covered by a large amount of clouds with high cloud albedo. However, as reported by previous climate model intercomparison projects, underestimated cloudiness and overestimated absorption of solar radiation (ASR) over the Southern Ocean lead to substantial biases in climate sensitivity. The present study revisits this long-standing issue and explores the uncertainty sources in the latest CMIP6 models. We employ 10-year satellite observations to evaluate cloud radiative effect (CRE) and cloud physical properties in five CMIP6 models that provide comprehensive output of cloud, radiation, and aerosol. The simulated longwave, shortwave, and net CRE at the top of atmosphere in CMIP6 are comparable with the CERES satellite observations. Total cloud fraction (CF) is also reasonably simulated in CMIP6, but the comparison of liquid cloud fraction (LCF) reveals marked biases in spatial pattern and seasonal variations. The discrepancies between the CMIP6 models and the MODIS satellite observations become even larger in other cloud macro- and micro-physical properties, including liquid water path (LWP), cloud optical depth (COD), and cloud effective radius, as well as aerosol optical depth (AOD). However, the large underestimation of both LWP and cloud effective radius (regional means ∼20% and 11%, respectively) results in relatively smaller bias in COD, and the impacts of the biases in COD and LCF also cancel out with each other, leaving CRE and ASR reasonably predicted in CMIP6. An error estimation framework is employed, and the different signs of the sensitivity errors and biases from CF and LWP corroborate the notions that there are compensating errors in the modeled shortwave CRE. Further correlation analyses of the geospatial patterns reveal that CF is the most relevant factor in determining CRE in observations, while the modeled CRE is too sensitive to LWP and COD. The relationships between cloud effective radius, LWP, and COD are also analyzed to explore the possible uncertainty sources in different models. Our study calls for more rigorous calibration of detailed cloud physical properties for future climate model development and climate projection.more » « less
