skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


This content will become publicly available on June 1, 2026

Title: Low temperature XPS of (η4-cyclooctatetraene)Ru(CO)3
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy was used to analyze an authentic sample of (η4-cyclooctatetraene)Ru(CO)3 held at 173 K to prevent sublimation of the compound during measurement. This precursor has previously shown utility for photoassisted chemical vapor deposition of Ru species onto alkanethiolate self-assembled monolayers. Herein, we report that the Ru signals for the Ru(0) complex are at a higher binding energy than those of pure Ru metal.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2216070 2216069
PAR ID:
10630165
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
AVS
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Surface Science Spectra
Volume:
32
Issue:
1
ISSN:
1055-5269
Page Range / eLocation ID:
014008
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. A novel process for the electrochemical atomic layer etching (e-ALE) of ruthenium (Ru) is described. In this process, the surface Ru is electrochemically oxidized to form a monolayer of ruthenium (III) hydroxide—Ru(OH)3. The Ru(OH)3monolayer is then selectively etched in an electrolyte containing chloride (Cl) species. This etching process is selective towards Ru(OH)3and does not attack the underlying Ru metal. Adsorbed Clon the Ru electrode is then cathodically desorbed before the sequence of Ru oxidation and Ru(OH)3etching is repeated. This e-ALE sequence is shown to etch Ru at approximately 0.5 monolayer per cycle while practically avoiding any surface roughness amplification. The proposed Ru e-ALE process uses a single electrolyte which eliminates the need for electrode transfer or electrolyte switching between process steps. In this report, we employ electrochemical, microscopic and spectroscopic techniques to gain insights into the various characteristics of the Ru e-ALE process. 
    more » « less
  2. The catalytic properties of monometallic and bimetallic Ru and Mo phosphides were evaluated for their ability to selectively hydrogenate furfural to furfuryl alcohol. Monometallic MoP showed high selectivity (98%) towards furfuryl alcohol, while RuP and Ru 2 P exhibited lower selectivity at comparable conversion. Bimetallic promotional effects were observed with Ru 1.0 Mo 1.0 P, as the pseudo-first order reaction rate constant for furfural hydrogenation to furfuryl alcohol, k 1 , was at least 5× higher than MoP, RuP, and Ru 2 P, while maintaining a 99% selectivity. Composition-directed catalytic studies of Ru x Mo 2−x P (0.8 < x < 1.2) provided evidence that Ru rich compositions positively influence k 1 , but not the selectivity. The rate constant ratio k 1 /( k 2 + k 3 ) for furfuryl alcohol production compared to methyl furan ( k 2 ) and tetrahyrofurfuryl alcohol ( k 3 ) followed the trend of Ru 1.0 Mo 1.0 P > Ru 1.2 Mo 0.8 P > MoP > Ru 0.8 Mo 1.2 P > RuP > Ru 2 P. Diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) was used to examine the configuration of adsorbed furfural on the synthesized catalysts, but the results were inconclusive and no correlation could be found with the selectivity due to the possible IR inactive surface modes with furfural adsorption. However, gas phase density functional theory calculations suggested the x = 1.0 material in Ru x Mo 2−x P (0.8 < x < 1.2) had the most favorable furfural adsorption energy. Experimentally, we also observed that the solvent greatly influenced both the conversion and selectivity, where isopropanol provided the highest selectivity to furfuryl alcohol. Finally, recycling experiments showed a 12% decrease in k 1 after 3 cycles without any regeneration, but the activity could be fully recovered through a re-reduction step. 
    more » « less
  3. This work outlines conditions suitable for the heteroepitaxial growth of Cr2O3(0001) films (1.5–20 nm thick) on a Ru(0001)-terminated substrate. Optimized growth is achieved by sputter deposition of Cr within a 4 mTorr Ar/O2 20% ambient at Ru temperatures ranging from 450 to 600 °C. The Cr2O3 film adopts a 30° rotated honeycomb configuration with respect to the underlying Ru(0001) substrate and exhibits a hexagonal lattice parameter consistent with that for bulk Cr2O3(0001). Heating to 700 °C within the same environment during film preparation leads to Ru oxidation. Exposure to temperatures at or above 400 °C in a vacuum, Ar, or Ar/H2 3% leads to chromia film degradation characterized by increased Ru 3d XPS intensity coupled with concomitant Cr 2p and O 1s peak attenuations when compared to data collected from unannealed films. An ill-defined but hexagonally well-ordered RuxCryOz surface structure is noted after heating the film in this manner. Heating within a wet Ar/H2 3% environment preserves the Cr2O3(0001)/Ru(0001) heterolayer structure to temperatures of at least 950 °C. Heating an Ru–Cr2O3–Ru heterostacked film to 950 °C within this environment is shown by cross-sectional scanning/transmission electron microscopy (S/TEM) to provide clear evidence of retained epitaxial bicrystalline oxide interlayer structure, interlayer immiscibility, and epitaxial registry between the top and bottom Ru layers. Subtle effects marked by O enrichment and O 1s and Cr 2p shifts to increased binding energies are noted by XPS in the near-Ru regions of Cr2O3(0001)/Ru(0001) and Ru(0001)/Cr2O3(0001)/Ru(0001) films after annealing to different temperatures in different sets of environmental conditions. 
    more » « less
  4. Ultra-high purity elemental sources have long been considered a prerequisite for obtaining low impurity concentrations in compound semiconductors in the world of molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) since its inception in 1968. However, we demonstrate that a “dirty” solid precursor, ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate [also known as Ru(acac)3], can yield single-phase, epitaxial, and superconducting Sr2RuO4 films with the same ease and control as III–V MBE. A superconducting transition was observed at ∼0.9 K, suggesting a low defect density and a high degree of crystallinity in these films. In contrast to the conventional MBE, which employs the ultra-pure Ru metal evaporated at ∼2000 °C as a Ru source, along with reactive ozone to obtain Ru → Ru4+ oxidation, the use of the Ru(acac)3 precursor significantly simplifies the MBE process by lowering the temperature for Ru sublimation (less than 200 °C) and by eliminating the need for ozone. Combining these results with the recent developments in hybrid MBE, we argue that leveraging the precursor chemistry will be necessary to realize next-generation breakthroughs in the synthesis of atomically precise quantum materials. 
    more » « less
  5. Electron transport measurements on 60-nm-thick multilayers containing N = 2–58 individual Ru and Co layers are employed to quantify the specific resistance of Ru/Co interfaces. Sputter deposition on Al2O3(0001) at Ts = 400 °C leads to a 0001 preferred orientation with x-ray diffraction (XRD) Ru and Co 0002 peaks that shift closer to each other with increasing N, suggesting interfacial intermixing. The intermixing is quantified by x-ray reflectivity (XRR) and confirmed by an XRD Ru/Co alloy peak that develops during in situ synchrotron annealing as well as for deposition at a higher Ts = 600 °C. The room-temperature resistivity increases from 15.0 to 47.5 μΩ cm with decreasing superlattice period Λ = 60–2 nm. This is attributed to increasing electron scattering at the intermixed metal interfaces. The transport data are well described by a parallel conductor model that treats metal layers and the intermixed alloy as parallel resistors, where the resistivity of the intermixed alloy of 60.4 μΩ cm is determined from a co-deposited Ru/Co sample. Data fitting provides values for the effective thickness of the intermixed interface of 16.8 nm, in good agreement with the XRR value, yielding a Ru/Co contact resistance of 8.5 × 10−15 Ω m2 for interfaces deposited at 400 °C. The overall results show that the Ru/Co contact resistance is dominated by a high-resistivity interfacial alloy and, therefore, is a strong function of the deposition process, particularly the processing temperature. 
    more » « less