skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


  • NSF Public Access
  • Search Results
  • Creation of a National Job Classification System for Research Administrators: Needs and Challenges of the Research Administrator Workforce
Title: Creation of a National Job Classification System for Research Administrators: Needs and Challenges of the Research Administrator Workforce
The project, funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) GRANTED program, focuses on identifying and addressing the critical needs and challenges faced by the research administrator workforce across institutions and organizations in the United States. The overarching goal is to develop a national job classification system that standardizes job titles, roles, and salary structures for research administrators. This initiative stems from the recognition that research administrators play a pivotal role in supporting faculty and enhancing research productivity. However, inconsistencies in job classifications and compensation have led to high turnover rates and recruitment challenges, particularly exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The project involved a comprehensive approach, including a virtual focus group, survey, and workshop, to gather diverse perspectives and develop actionable solutions. By creating a standardized system, the project seeks to improve recruitment, retention, and overall workforce effectiveness, contributing to the success and innovation of research enterprises nationwide. The following files are available and shared:1. Survey Instrument - This deposit includes the complete survey instrument used in the NSF-funded project. The survey is designed to collect data on the roles, responsibilities, and challenges faced by research administrators, aiming to gather insights to inform the creation of a national job classification system. The survey was distributed nationally using SurveyMonkey to a broad range of research administrators and was open for participation from June 17 to July 17, 2024. Distribution lists included the Society of Research Administrators International (SRAI) membership, National Council of University Research Administrators (NCURA) membership, NSF GRANTED listserv, Research Administration Listserv (RESADM-L), focus group participants, and the Midwest Research and Graduate Administrators Forum. Administered by SRAI on behalf of Jennifer Woodward and Evan Roberts, the survey remained open for 30 days with one reminder. No compensation was provided for participation. Questions 35 and 36 in the survey were adapted with permission from the CUPA-HR Employee Retention Survey. Sharing this instrument supports transparency and allows others to replicate and build upon the study.2. Survey Data - The survey data deposit contains the raw dataset collected using the survey instrument. The data includes responses from 2,441 research administrators across various institutions, providing a comprehensive view of their experiences and challenges. This dataset is essential for analyzing trends and validating findings that will contribute to the development of a national job classification system. The data are anonymized and shared to foster collaboration in addressing workforce issues and enhancing research administration effectiveness.3. Survey Analysis Slides - The slides summarize the analysis of the survey data. The slides present key findings and insights into the needs and challenges faced by research administrators, including issues related to job title consistency, roles and responsibilities, and salary structures. Visual representations, such as charts and graphs, illustrate the analysis of survey responses, highlighting significant challenges and potential solutions. These slides are shared to communicate the project's outcomes and support informed discussions on improving research administration through standardization and strategic initiatives.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2324360
PAR ID:
10633829
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Publisher / Repository:
figshare
Date Published:
Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
Workforce planning Workplace wellbeing and quality of working life Human resources management Employment equity and diversity Leadership Organisational planning and management Production and operations management Strategy, management and organisational behaviour not elsewhere classified Strategy
Format(s):
Medium: X Size: 10422684 Bytes
Size(s):
10422684 Bytes
Right(s):
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; (, The journal of research administration)
    Taylor, Jennifer E (Ed.)
    Research administrators are integral to the research enterprise, yet the profession remains hindered by the absence of standardized job titles, responsibilities, and compensation frameworks. These inconsistencies drive turnover, restrict career progression, and weaken institutional efficiency. The findings and recommendations from a three-phase National Science Foundation (NSF)-funded GRANTED conference are presented in this study. To begin, regional focus groups with research administration leaders and human resources professionals identified themes related to organizational structures and workforce practices. These insights informed a national survey that produced 2,441 responses across diverse institution types from individuals with more than 1,200 distinct job titles. A final workshop of senior practitioners reviewed the survey results and provided recommendations. Findings indicate that workload, limited advancement opportunities, and inadequate compensation are leading causes of attrition, while misaligned human resources policies, decentralized authority, and regional pay variation prevent standardization. Participants stressed the need for consistent job descriptions, defined competencies, and equitable pay frameworks. The results underscore the importance of developing a national job classification system for research administrators to stabilize the profession and strengthen institutional research infrastructure. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; (, Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics)
    Yoshizawa, Go (Ed.)
    PurposeThe purpose of this article is to investigate particular aspects of the STEM job market in the US. In particular, we ask: could the possession of high performance computing (HPC) skills enhance the chances of a person getting a job and/or increase starting salaries for people receiving an undergraduate or graduate degree and entering the technical workforce (rather than academia)? We also estimate the value to the US economy of practical experience offered to US students through training about HPC and the opportunity to use HPC systems funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and accessible nationally. MethodsInterviews and surveys of employers of graduates in STEM fields were used to gauge demand for STEM graduates with practical HPC experience and the salary increase that can be associated with the possession of such skills. We used data from the XSEDE project to determine how many undergraduate and graduate students it enabled to acquire practical proficiency with HPC. ResultsPeople with such skills who had completed an undergraduate or graduate degree received an initial median hiring salary of approximately 7%–15% more than those with the same degrees who did not possess such skills. XSEDE added approximately $10 million or more per year to the US economy through the practical educational opportunities it offered. DiscussionPractical hands-on experience provided by the US federal government, as well as many universities and colleges in the US, holds value for students as they enter the workforce. ConclusionPractical training in HPC during the course of undergraduate and graduate programs has the potential to produce positive individual labor market outcomes (i.e., salary boosts, signing bonuses) as well as to help address the shortage of STEM workers in the private sector of the US. 
    more » « less
  3. ; (, Designsafe-CI)
    This project includes a survey instrument, data, and annual census reports from the National Science Foundation (NSF)-funded Social Science Extreme Events Research (SSEER) network, which is headquartered at the Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure (NHERI) CONVERGE facility at the Natural Hazards Center at the University of Colorado Boulder. The SSEER network, which was launched in 2018, was formed, in part, to respond to the need for more specific information about the status and expertise of the social science hazards and disaster research workforce. The mission of SSEER is to identify and map social scientists involved in hazards and disaster research in order to highlight their expertise and connect social science researchers to one another, to interdisciplinary teams, and to communities at risk to hazards and affected by disasters. Ultimately, the goals of SSEER are to amplify the contributions of social scientists and to advance the field through expanding the available social science evidence base. To see the SSEER map and to learn more about the SSEER initiative, please visit: https://converge.colorado.edu/research-networks/sseer. All social and behavioral scientists and those in allied disciplines who study the human, economic, policy, and health dimensions of disasters are invited to join this network via a short online survey. This DesignSafe project includes: (1) the SSEER survey instrument; (2) de-identified data, which is updated annually as new researchers join the SSEER network and returning members update their information; and (3) SSEER annual census reports. These resources are available to all who are interested in learning more about the composition of the social science hazards and disaster workforce. SSEER is part of a larger ecosystem of NSF-funded extreme events research and reconnaissance networks designed to help coordinate disciplinary communities in engineering and the sciences, while also encouraging cross-disciplinary information sharing and interdisciplinary integration. To learn more about the networks and research ecosystem, please visit: https://converge.colorado.edu/research-networks/. 
    more » « less
  4. ; (, Journal of advanced technological education)
    Whether developing new programs or updating existing programs, educators and their industry partners must effectively – and efficiently – communicate and collaborate to create curricula needed to help graduates meet the needs of the workforce. The “IT Skill Standards 2020 and Beyond” (ITSS) National Science Foundation (NSF) Advanced Technological Education (ATE) project collaborated with over 250 employers across the country to identify and develop future-facing skill standards for the most critical IT job clusters. The Texas Skills Standards Board has recognized and adopted those six standards clusters. The “engine” that powered this work was the Business and Industry Leadership Team (BILT) model, which provides a structured, repeatable method for engaging employers nationwide to ensure curriculum aligns with workforce needs. To date, over 150 colleges, universities, and projects across 35 states have adopted the BILT model. In 2023 and 2024, the overall skill standards development process – which includes the BILT Model – was taught to faculty and administrators across multiple technical disciplines. Overall, six ITSS Summit workshops were held for over 100 attendees from 44 schools in 21 states. Ten ITSS Summit teams participated in 1:1 mentoring sessions in Spring 2024 with grant staff to support their implementation. Each team pursued customized goals to strengthen their own programs’ relationships with employers and better align the curriculum to workforce needs. Quantitative and qualitative survey data on the impact of the ITSS Summit program demonstrate the value of the ITSS Process and the BILT model of industry engagement. 
    more » « less
  5. ; (, ASEE annual conference & exposition)
    To build the nation's skilled technical workforce, the demand for entry and middle-skill professionals in technical fields in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) is increasing. The alignment between educational programming and job requirements for STEM-oriented technicians is essential for establishing career pathways that produce high-quality middle skills professionals for technology-rich fields. Building on prior research on rural Florida’s information technologies career pathways, in this National Science Foundation (NSF) Advanced Technician Education (ATE) targeted research project, FSU researchers are investigating alignment among educational opportunities, employer needs, student readiness and new employee experiences in Advanced Manufacturing (AM) and test the usefulness of tools and processes developed to assess such alignment, focusing on the opportunities and challenges in Florida’s rural areas. Researchers constructed and are iteratively refining an AM Body of Knowledge (BOK) for analysis and community engagement. The quantitative and qualitative mixed methods research design combines content analysis and text mining using the BOK with surveys, and interviews/focus groups. The research team is applying text mining approaches to identify the match between syllabi learning outcomes, industry certification requirements, state curriculum frameworks, and job postings. In interviews and focus groups, researchers are qualitatively assessing the employers’ competency expectations and new professionals’ job experiences. These analyses will build capacity among rural stakeholders to strengthen and expand their technical workforce. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email