skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


This content will become publicly available on December 2, 2026

Title: Arthropod rain in a lowland tropical forest
Abstract In lowland tropical forests, “arthropod rain” (i.e., arthropods falling from the canopy to the understory), represents a potentially important terrestrial nutrient flux.We investigated the composition, abundance, biomass and environmental drivers of arthropod rain on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Pairs of traps (pan traps and pole traps) placed 1 m above the ground, respectively, collected fallen arthropods and arthropods potentially climbing to the canopy.Average (±SE) arthropod biomass in pan traps was dominated by Hymenoptera (primarily ants; 0.501 ± 0.023 mg dry mass m−2 day−1) and Lepidoptera larvae (0.228 ± 0.001 mg m−2 day−1). Total dry biomass in pan traps was 0.891 ± 0.033 mg m−2 day−1; thus, ca. 27 kg of arthropod biomass rains into the understory per km2per month during the wet season in this forest. This equates to ca. 3 million mid‐sized ants falling from the canopy per day on BCI as a whole.Arthropod abundance in pan traps, especially ants and spiders, increased marginally with the increasing number of high‐wind events. By contrast, arthropod biomass showed no relationship with wind or rain.Arthropod abundance was higher in pole traps than in pan traps and was dominated by Collembola and Acari. Compositional overlap between pan and pole trap contents suggests that some fallen arboreal arthropods regularly return to the canopy.These findings illustrate an understudied pathway linking canopy and understory food webs within tropical forests, and the complex interactions between environmental conditions and arthropod rain.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2015841 2015817
PAR ID:
10650968
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley-Blackwell
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Insect Conservation and Diversity
ISSN:
1752-458X
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract Non‐crop habitats are essential for sustaining biodiversity of beneficial arthropods in agricultural landscapes, which can increase ecosystem services provision and crop yield. However, their effects on specific crop systems are less clear, such as soybean in South America, where the responses of pests and natural enemies to landscape structure have only recently been studied.Here, we analysed how native forest fragments at local and landscape scales influenced arthropod communities, herbivory and yield in soybean fields in central Argentina. To do this, we selected soybean fields located in agricultural landscapes with varying proportions of forest cover. At two distances (10 and 100 m) from a focal forest fragment, we sampled natural enemy and herbivore arthropods, and measured soybean herbivory and yield. We focused on herbivore diversity, abundance of key soybean pests in the region (caterpillars and stink bugs), and their generalist and specialist natural enemies.Higher abundance of predators, lower herbivory rates and increased yield were found near forests, while overall forest cover in the landscape was positively related with parasitoid and stink bug abundance, soybean yield, and negatively with herbivory. Moreover, yield was positively linked to richness and abundance of generalist and specialist enemies and independent of herbivory according to piecewise Structural Equation Models.Synthesis and applications. Our results show positive effects of native forests on biodiversity and yield in soybean crops, highlighting the need for conservation of forest fragments in agricultural landscapes. Moreover, the relation between natural enemies and crop yield suggests that Chaco forests support a diverse and abundant community of natural enemies that can provide sustained levels of ecosystem services and result in positive effects for farmers. 
    more » « less
  2. Abstract We contrast the response of arthropod abundance and composition to bison grazing lawns during a drought and non‐drought year, with an emphasis on acridid grasshoppers, an important grassland herbivore.Grazing lawns are grassland areas where regular grazing by mammalian herbivores creates patches of short‐statured, high nutrient vegetation. Grazing lawns are predictable microsites that modify microclimate, plant structure, community composition, and nutrient availability, with likely repercussions for arthropod communities.One year of our study occurred during an extreme drought. Drought mimics some of the effects of mammalian grazers: decreasing above‐ground plant biomass while increasing plant foliar percentage nitrogen.We sampled arthropods and nutrient availability on and nearby (“off”) 10 bison‐grazed grazing lawns in a tallgrass prairie in NE Kansas. Total grasshopper abundance was higher on grazing lawns and the magnitude of this difference increased in the wetter year of 2019 compared to 2018, when drought led to high grass foliar nitrogen concentrations on and off grazing lawns. Mixed‐feeding grasshopper abundances were consistently higher on grazing lawns while grass‐feeder and forb‐feeder abundances were higher on lawns only in 2019, the wetter year. In contrast, the abundance of other arthropods (e.g., Hemiptera, Hymenoptera, and Araneae) did not differ on and off lawns, but increased overall in 2019, relative to the drought of 2018.Understanding these local scale patterns of abundances and community composition improves predictability of arthropod responses to ongoing habitat change. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract Recent declines in wild bee populations have led to increases in conservation actions and monitoring of bee communities. Pan traps are a commonly used sampling method for monitoring bee populations due to their efficiency and low cost. However, potential biases inherent in different sampling techniques may result in misleading characterizations of bee communities across space and time.In this paper, we examined how bee communities sampled using pan traps and aerial nets changed seasonally, and if they were affected by the availability of floral resources.We found strong seasonal changes in the abundance, but not the richness, of bees captured in pan traps. Notably, we captured the fewest bees during weeks in spring when most flowering plant species were in bloom, suggesting that floral resource availability influences pan trap captures. We also compared patterns of bee abundance in pan traps to those captured by aerial netting. Bee richness in pans and nets was positively correlated, but relative abundances in pan and net samples were dominated by different bee genera. Furthermore, most genera decreased in pans with increasing floral richness, but patterns were mixed for nets. When using presence/absence data, rather than abundance, community composition was more similar between netted and pan‐trapped bee communities and changed less substantially across the floral richness gradient.Overall, these differences led to sampling substantially different bee community compositions in pan traps versus nets, especially when using abundance‐based methods to characterize the bee community. By examining multiple years of intensive seasonal sampling of plant and bee communities, we document potential pitfalls with methods commonly used to sample bee communities.We suggest that pan trapping and aerial netting provide similar estimates of bee species richness and community composition when using presence/absence data, but that practitioners should interpret pan‐trapped bee abundance data with caution especially when comparing bee communities between sites where plant communities may differ. 
    more » « less
  4. ABSTRACT Emerging aquatic insects can be an important resource subsidy for a variety of terrestrial consumers, including spiders, birds, bats and lizards. Emergence flux is influenced by a variety of abiotic and biotic variables, such as temperature, drying, and predators and these variables can also control the body size of emergent insects. Despite their importance, these variables can change rapidly during drought conditions as water temperatures rise, surface area decreases and predator densities increase.During 2018, the Konza Prairie Biological Station experienced a record drought: flow ceased in the lower reaches of Kings Creek for the first time in over 40 years of observation, leaving a series of isolated pools. We studied how the drought affected aquatic insect emergence in 12 of these pools via elevated temperatures, decreased surface area, and concentration of predators (e.g. fishes and crayfish) over a four‐week period. We returned in 2020 and sampled emergence in the same pools over 2 weeks under non‐drought conditions to compare emergence between drought and non‐drought conditions.We found three overall patterns: (1) rates of areal emergence abundance and biomass (number or mg DM m−2d−1) did not differ between drought and non‐drought conditions. In contrast, pool‐scale emergence abundance, but not biomass (number or mg DM pool−1d−1), was lower during drought conditions; (2) average midge body size was larger during the drought relative to the non‐drought conditions; (3) environmental variables (e.g. temperature, pool surface area, predator biomass) were not predictive of emergence during drought and non‐drought conditions.Fewer, but larger emergent midges (as seen under drought conditions) may represent a higher quality resource for terrestrial consumers than many smaller midges due to increased per‐capita energy yield. However, due to the overall decrease in water availability throughout the stream network, the overall emergence flux was concentrated in reaches with remaining water during the drought, making pools emergence subsidy hotspots. Overall, these contrasting responses underscore the complex nature of community responses to shifting climatic conditions. 
    more » « less
  5. Abstract With predictions of increased frequency of intense hurricanes, it is increasingly crucial to understand how biotic and abiotic components of forests will be affected. This study describes canopy arthropod responses to repeated experimental and natural canopy opening at the Luquillo Experimental Forest Long‐term Ecological Research Site (LTER) in Puerto Rico. The canopy trimming experiment (CTE1) treatments were started in 2004, and a second trimming (CTE2) was conducted in 2014, to study effects of increased hurricane frequency at the site. Paired disturbed plots with canopy trimmed (trim) and undisturbed plots with no trimming (no trim) were replicated in three experimental blocks. Arthropods were sampled by bagging branches on seven representative early and late successional overstory and understory tree species annually from 2004 to 2009 for CTE1 and 2015 to 2019 for CTE2. In addition to the experimental manipulation, the CTE site was disturbed by Hurricane Maria (Category 4) in September 2017, providing an additional natural canopy opening to the experiment. We evaluated the effect of the second experimental trimming, compared canopy arthropod responses to the three canopy‐opening events, and compared the effects of experimental trimming and natural canopy opening by Hurricane Maria. The second experimental canopy trimming produced canopy arthropod responses consistent with hurricane disturbances, with sap‐sucking herbivores increasing in abundance on the trimmed plots, whereas other functional groups generally declined in abundance in disturbed plots. Responses to the first and second trimmings were generally similar. However, Hurricane Maria exacerbated the responses, indicating the likely effect of increased hurricane frequency and intensity. 
    more » « less