Search for: All records

Measuring displacements in model tests typically involves contact-based sensors such as linear potentiometers, where contact between two moving parts occurs at the sensing point. The sensor's finite mass, the limited stiffness of the beams and the clamping mechanism, and the slippage and hinging of the sensor body could affect the object's response and lead to measurement errors. Also, the physical mounting rack required to hold these sensors often obstructs the view and makes significant areas unavailable for conducting some other essential investigations. The advancement in high-speed, high-resolution and reasonably priced rugged cameras makes it feasible to obtain better displacement measurements by image analysis. This paper introduces a non-contact method that works by video recording the projection of laser lines on a test object to measure static and dynamic vertical displacements. The technique produces a continuous settlement distribution along the laser line passing through multiple objects of interest. This paper presents the theory for converting laser line images to displacements. The new method's validity is demonstrated by comparing the results from other measurement techniques: hand measurements, linear potentiometers and three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry. 

Ottawa F-65 sand (supplied by US Silica, Ottawa, Illinois) was selected as the standard sand for LEAP-UCD-2017. Between December 2017 and February 2018, each LEAP research team sent 500 g samples of sand to UC Davis for grain size analysis and minimum and maximum dry density testing. The purpose of this testing was to confirm the consistency of the sand used at various test sites and to provide updated minimum and maximum density index values. The variation of measured properties among the different samples is similar to the variation measured during repeat testing of the same sample. Modified LEAP procedures to measure index densities are used to confirm consistency of the sands, and the results from these procedures are compared to results from ASTM procedures. The LEAP procedures give repeatable results with median index densities of ρmin ¼ 1457 kg/m3, ρmax ¼ 1754 kg/m3. Relative densities calculated with facility-specific index densities varied by less than 4%, so we conclude that average index densities from all the sites may be used for analysis of the results. The LEAP procedures are easier to perform than the ASTM procedures and do not require specialized equipment; therefore, continued use of the LEAP procedure for frequent quality control purposes is recommended. However, the values from ASTM procedures are expected to be more consistent with values adopted in liquefaction literature in the past; therefore, we recommend using the median ASTM values for analysis of LEAP data. Index densities from ASTM procedures (ρmin ¼ 1490.5 kg/m3, ρmax ¼ 1757.0 kg/m3) produce relative densities that are 4 –10% smaller than the index densities from the LEAP procedures. 

Three centrifuge experiments were performed at the University of California, Davis, for LEAP-UCD-2017. LEAP is a collaborative effort to assess repeatability of centrifuge test results and to provide data for the validation of numerical models used to predict the effects of liquefaction. The model configuration used the same geometry as the LEAP-GWU-2015 exercise: a submerged slope of Ottawa F-65 sand inclined at 5 degrees in a rigid container. This paper focuses on presenting results from the two destructive ground motions from each of the three centrifuge models. The effect of each destructive ground motion is evaluated by accelerometer recordings, pore pressure response, and lateral deformation of the soil surface. New techniques were implemented for measuring liquefaction-induced lateral deformations using five GoPro cameras and GEO-PIV software. The methods for measuring the achieved density of the as-built model are also discussed. 

A cone penetrometer was specifically designed for the LEAP project to provide an assessment of centrifuge model densities independent from mass and volume measurements. This paper presents the design of the CPT and analyses of the results. Due to uncertainty in the specifications about how to define zero depth of penetration, about 20% of the CPT profiles were corrected to produce more accurate results. The procedure for depth correction is explained. After these corrections, penetration resistances at the representative depths of 1.5, 2, 2.5, and 3 m (prototype depth) are correlated to the reported specimen dry densities by linear regression. Using the inverse form of the linear regression equations, the density of each specimen could be estimated from the penetration resistance. Kutter et al. (LEAP-UCD-2017 comparison of centrifuge test results. In Model Tests and Numerical Simulations of Liquefaction and Lateral Spreading: LEAP-UCD-2017, 2019b) found that the density determined from penetration resistance was a more reliable predictor of liquefaction behavior than the reported density itself. Finally, the centrifuge tests at different LEAP facilities modeled the same prototype in different containers using different length scale factors (1/20 to 1/44); thus the ratio of layer thickness to cone diameter was different in each experiment. It appears that the penetration resistances are noticeably affected by container width and, to a lesser extent, resistance is affected by the length scale factor. 

This paper describes how the LEAP-UCD-2017 data is organized in DesignSafe; it is intended to help users, archivers, and curators find or organize data of interest. Several key files, folders, and documents included in the archive are discussed: (1) an Excel format data template used to document much of the data and metadata for each model (sensor data, cone penetrometer data, and surface marker data as reported by the experimenters), (2) processed sensor data files with time offsets and zero and calibration corrections that facilitate comparison of consistently formatted data from various model tests, (3) plots of processed data for quick overview and comparison of results among experiments, and (4) photographs taken during construction and testing. 

This paper compares experimental results from every facility for LEAP-UCD-2017. The specified experiment consisted of a submerged medium-dense clean sand with a 5-degree slope subjected to 1 Hz ramped sine wave base motion in a rigid container. The ground motions and soil density were intentionally varied from experiment to experiment in hopes of defining the slope of the relational trend between response (e.g., displacement, pore pressure), intensity of shaking, and density or relative density. This paper is also intended to serve as a useful starting point for overview of the experimental results and to help others find specific experiments if they want to select a subset for further analysis. The results of the experiments show significant differences between each other, but the responses show a significant correlation, R2 ~ 0.7–0.8, to the known variation of the input parameters. 

The experimental results of LEAP (Liquefaction Experiments and Analysis Projects) centrifuge test replicas of a saturated sloping deposit are used to assess the sensitivity of soil accelerations to variability in input motion and soil deposition. A difference metric is used to quantify the dissimilarities between recorded acceleration time histories. This metric is uniquely decomposed in terms of four difference component measures associated with phase, frequency shift, amplitude at 1 Hz, and amplitude of frequency components higher than 2 Hz (2 + Hz). The sensitivity of the deposit response accelerations to differences in input motion amplitude at 1 Hz and 2 + Hz and cone penetration resistance (used as a measure reflecting soil deposition and initial grain packing condition) was obtained using a Gaussian process-based kriging. These accelerations were found to be more sensitive to variations in cone penetration resistance values than to the amplitude of the input motion 1 Hz and 2 + Hz (frequency) components. The sensitivity functions associated with this resistance parameter were found to be substantially nonlinear. 

This paper presents comparisons of 11 sets of Type-B numerical simulations with the results of a selected set of centrifuge tests conducted in the LEAP-2017 project. Time histories of accelerations, excess pore water pressures, and lateral displacement of the ground surface are compared to the results of nine centrifuge tests. A number of numerical simulations showed trends similar to those observed in the experiments. While achieving a close match to all measured responses (accelerations, pore pressures, and displacements) is quite challenging, the numerical simulations show promising capabilities that can be further improved with the availability of additional high-quality experimental results. 

This paper summarizes the guidelines provided to the numerical simulation/prediction teams that participated in the LEAP-2017 prediction exercise. These guidelines are developed for the Phase 1 of the simulations that focused on the use of cyclic triaxial element tests for calibration of constitutive models that the participating teams used in their numerical simulations/predictions. 

This paper presents a summary of the element test simulations (calibration simulations) submitted by 11 numerical simulation (prediction) teams that participated in the LEAP-2017 prediction exercise. A significant number of monotonic and cyclic triaxial (Vasko, An investigation into the behavior of Ottawa sand through monotonic and cyclic shear tests. Masters Thesis, The George Washington University, 2015; Vasko et al., LEAP-GWU-2015 Laboratory Tests. DesignSafe-CI, Dataset, 2018; El Ghoraiby et al., LEAP 2017: Soil characterization and element tests for Ottawa F65 sand. The George Washington University, Washington, DC, 2017; El Ghoraiby et al., LEAP-2017 GWU Laboratory Tests. DesignSafe-CI, Dataset, 2018; El Ghoraiby et al., Physical and mechanical properties of Ottawa F65 Sand. In B. Kutter et al. (Eds.), Model tests and numerical simulations of liquefaction and lateral spreading: LEAP-UCD-2017. New York: Springer, 2019) and direct simple shear tests (Bastidas, Ottawa F-65 Sand Characterization. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Davis, 2016) are available for Ottawa F-65 sand. The focus of this element test simulation exercise is to assess the performance of the constitutive models used by participating team in simulating the results of undrained stress-controlled cyclic triaxial tests on Ottawa F-65 sand for three different void ratios (El Ghoraiby et al., LEAP 2017: Soil characterization and element tests for Ottawa F65 sand. The George Washington University, Washington, DC, 2017; El Ghoraiby et al., LEAP-2017 GWU Laboratory Tests. DesignSafe-CI, Dataset, 2018; El Ghoraiby et al., Physical and mechanical properties of Ottawa F65 Sand. In B. Kutter et al. (Eds.), Model tests and numerical simulations of liquefaction and lateral spreading: LEAP-UCD-2017. New York: Springer, 2019). The simulated stress paths, stress-strain responses, and liquefaction strength curves show that majority of the models used in this exercise are able to provide a reasonably good match to liquefaction strength curves for the highest void ratio (0.585) but the differences between the simulations and experiments become larger for the lower void ratios (0.542 and 0.515).