skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Award ID contains: 2030556

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Fang, F. (Ed.)
  2. Fang, F. (Ed.)
  3. We consider a prototypical path planning problem on a graph with uncertain cost of mobility on its edges. At a given node, the planning agent can access the true cost for edges to its neighbors and uses a noisy simulator to estimate the cost-to-go from the neighboring nodes. The objective of the planning agent is to select a neighboring node such that, with high probability, the cost-to-go is minimized for the worst possible realization of uncertain parameters in the simulator. By modeling the cost-to-go as a Gaussian process (GP) for every realization of the uncertain parameters, we apply a scenario approach in which we draw fixed independent samples of the uncertain parameter. We present a scenario-based iterative algorithm using the upper confidence bound (UCB) of the fixed independent scenarios to compute the choice of the neighbor to go to. We characterize the performance of the proposed algorithm in terms of a novel notion of regret defined with respect to an additional draw of the uncertain parameter, termed as scenario regret under re-draw. In particular, we characterize a high probability upper bound on the regret under re-draw for any finite number of iterations of the algorithm, and show that this upper bound tends to zero asymptotically with the number of iterations. We supplement our analysis with numerical results. 
    more » « less
  4. null (Ed.)
  5. null (Ed.)