Search for: All records

Knowledge Tracing (KT) focuses on quantifying student knowledge according to the student's past performance. While KT models focus on modeling student knowledge, they miss the behavioral aspect of learning, such as the types of learning materials that the students choose to learn from. This is mainly because traditional knowledge tracing (KT) models only consider assessed activities, like solving questions. Recently, there has been a growing interest in multi-type KT which considers both assessed and non-assessed activities (like video lectures). Since multi-type KT models include different learning material types, they present a new opportunity to investigate student behavior, as in the choice of the learning material type, along with student knowledge. We argue that student knowledge can affect their behavior, and student interest in learning materials may affect their knowledge. In this paper, we model the relationship between students' knowledge states and their choice of learning activities. To this end, we propose Pareto-TAMKOT which frames the simultaneous learning of student knowledge and behavior as a multi-task learning problem. It employs a transition-aware multi-activity KT method for two objectives: modeling student knowledge and student behavior. Pareto-TAMKOT uses the Pareto Multi-task learning algorithm (Pareto MTL) to solve this multi-objective optimization problem. We evaluate Pareto-TAMKOT on one real-world dataset, demonstrating the benefit of approaching student knowledge and behavior modeling as a multi-task learning problem. 

K-12 Computer Science (CS) education has seen remarkable growth recently, driven by the increasing focus on CS and Computational Thinking (CT) integration. Despite the abundance of Professional development (PD) programs designed to prepare future CS teachers with the required knowledge and skills, there is a lack of research on how teachers' perceptions and attitudes of CS and CT evolve before and after participating in these programs. To address this gap, our exploratory study aims to study the dynamics of pre-and in-service teachers' experiences, attitudes, and perceptions towards CS and CT through their participation in a K-12 CS education micro-credential program. In this study, we employed topic modeling to identify topics that emerged from teachers' written pre- and post-CS autobiographies, conducted statistical analysis to explore how these topics evolve over time and applied regression analysis to investigate the factors influencing these dynamics. We observed a shift in teachers' initial feelings of fear, intimidation, and stress towards confidence, fun, and feeling competent in basic CS, reflecting a positive transformation. Regression analysis revealed that features, such as experienced teacher status and CT conceptual understanding, correlate with participants' evolving views. These observed relationships highlight the micro-credential's role in not only enhancing technical competency but also fostering an adaptive, integrative pedagogical mindset, providing new insights for course design. 

This paper was written with the help of ChatGPT. Recent advancements in the development and deployment of large generative language models to power generative AI tools, including OpenAIż˝fs ChatGPT, have led to their broad usage across virtually all fields of study. While the tools have been trained to generate human-like-dialogue in response to questions or prompts, they are similarly used to compose larger, more complex artifacts, including social media posts, essays, and even research articles. Although this abstract has been written entirely by a human without any input, consultation, or revision from a generative language model, it would likely be difficult to discern any difference as a reader. In light of this, there is growing debate and concern regarding using these models to aid the writing process, particularly concerning publication. Aside from some notable risks, including the unintentional generation of false information, citation of non-existing research articles, or plagiarism by generating text that is sampled from another source without proper citation, there are additional questions pertaining to the originality of ideas expressed in a work has been partially-written or revised by a generative language model. We present this paper as both a case study into the usage of generative models to aid in the writing of academic research articles but also as an example of how transparency and open science practices may help in addressing several issues that have been raised in other contexts and communities. While this paper neither attempts to promote nor contest the use of these language models in any writing task, it is the goal of this work to provide insight and potential guidance into the ethical and effective usage of these models within this domain. 

With the support of digital learning platforms, synchronous and collaborative learning has become a prominent learning paradigm in mathematics education. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) has emerged as a valuable tool for enhancing mathematical discourse, problem solving, and ultimately learning outcomes. This paper presents an innovative examination of Graspable Math (GM), a dynamic mathematic notation and learning online platform, to enable synchronous, collaborative learning between pairs of students. Through analyzing students' online log data, we adopt a data-driven method to better understand the intricate dynamics of collaborative learning in mathematics as it happens. Specifically, we apply frequency distributions, cluster analysis to present students' dynamic interaction patterns and identify distinctive profiles of collaboration. Our findings reveal several collaboration profiles that emerge through these analyses. This research not only bridges the gap in current CSCL tools for mathematics, but also provides empirical insights into the effective design and implementation of such tools. The insights gained from this research offer implications for the design of digital learning tools that support effective and engaging collaborative learning experiences. 

This study investigates the influence of short breaks on self-regulated learning within an online learning platform and their impact on student attrition and performance outcomes. The research focuses on 7th-grade students¿½f mathematics performance using an online learning platform in 2016. Building on this goal, we conducted two regression analyses to investigate the number of students who stopped out and returned to finish the assignments and explore the duration of breaks between questions among those students who returned to complete the assignments. Specifically, the study analyzes session durations, break intervals, and their correlation with student performance after stopping out. Results reveal that, despite prevalent breaks between problems, break duration does not significantly affect learning performance. The findings provide correlations between short breaks and the completeness and correctness within self-regulated learning contexts. The study emphasizes the need for an exploration of predicting diverse assignment difficulty, break duration, and completeness. This research contributes valuable insights into self-regulated learning on online learning platform and predicting the potential for student success. 

Open-ended learning environments (OELEs) involve high learner agency in defining learning goals and multiple pathways to achieve those goals. These tasks involve learners transitioning through self-regulated learning (SRL) phases by actively setting goals, applying different strategies for those goals, and monitoring performance to update their strategies. However, because of the flexibility, how learners react to impasses and errors has a critical influence on their learning. An intelligent pedagogical agent (IPA) continuously modeling learner activities could help support learners in these environments. However, this continuous comprehension of behaviors and strategies is difficult in OELEs with evolving goals, ill-defined problem structures, and learning sequences. In this paper, we draw from the literature on SRL phases and cognitive states to investigate the utility of two different methods, Sequence Mapping, and Hidden Markov Models, in building learner activity models from log data collected from a summer camp with 14 middle school girls in an open-design environment. We evaluate the effectiveness of these models separately, and combined, in identifying 7 states: Forethought, Engaged Concentration, Acting, Monitoring, Wheel Spinning, Mind Wandering, and Reflect and Repair. Lastly, we recommend dialogue intervention strategies for an IPA to support learning in OELEs. 

The educational data mining community has extensively investigated affect detection in learning platforms, finding associations between affective states and a wide range of learning outcomes. Based on these insights, several studies have used affect detectors to create interventions tailored to respond to when students are bored, confused, or frustrated. However, these detector-based interventions have depended on detecting affect when it occurs and therefore inherently respond to affective states after they have begun. This might not always be soon enough to avoid a negative experience for the student. In this paper, we aim to predict students' affective states in advance. Within our approach, we attempt to determine the maximum prediction window where detector performance remains sufficiently high, documenting the decay in performance when this prediction horizon is increased. Our results indicate that it is possible to predict confusion, frustration, and boredom in advance with performance over chance for prediction horizons of 120, 40, and 50 seconds, respectively. These findings open the door to designing more timely interventions. 

The effectiveness of feedback in enhancing learning outcomes is well documented within Educational Data Mining (EDM). Various prior research have explored methodologies to enhance the effectiveness of feedback to students in various ways. Recent developments in Large Language Models (LLMs) have extended their utility in enhancing automated feedback systems. This study aims to explore the potential of LLMs in facilitating automated feedback in math education in the form of numeric assessment scores. We examine the effectiveness of LLMs in evaluating student responses and scoring the responses by comparing 3 different models: Llama, SBERT-Canberra, and GPT4 model. The evaluation requires the model to provide a quantitative score on the student's responses to open-ended math problems. We employ Mistral, a version of Llama catered to math, and fine-tune this model for evaluating student responses by leveraging a dataset of student responses and teacher-provided scores for middle-school math problems. A similar approach was taken for training the SBERT-Canberra model, while the GPT4 model used a zero-shot learning approach. We evaluate and compare the models' performance in scoring accuracy. This study aims to further the ongoing development of automated assessment and feedback systems and outline potential future directions for leveraging generative LLMs in building automated feedback systems. 

One of the areas where Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise is for automated qualitative coding, typically framed as a text classification task in natural language processing (NLP). Their demonstrated ability to leverage in-context learning to operate well even in data-scarce settings poses the question of whether collecting and annotating large-scale data for training qualitative coding models is still beneficial. In this paper, we empirically investigate the performance of LLMs designed for use in prompting-based in-context learning settings, and draw a comparison to models that have been trained using the traditional pretraining--finetuning paradigm with task-specific annotated data, specifically for tasks involving qualitative coding of classroom dialog. Compared to other domains where NLP studies are typically situated, classroom dialog is much more natural and therefore messier. Moreover, tasks in this domain are nuanced and theoretically grounded and require a deep understanding of the conversational context. We provide a comprehensive evaluation across five datasets, including tasks such as talkmove prediction and collaborative problem solving skill identification. Our findings show that task-specific finetuning strongly outperforms in-context learning, showing the continuing need for high-quality annotated training datasets. 

Open-ended learning environments (OELEs) have become an important tool for promoting constructivist STEM learning. OELEs are known to promote student engagement and facilitate a deeper understanding of STEM topics. Despite their benefits, OELEs present significant challenges to novice learners who may lack the self-regulated learning (SRL) processes they need to become effective learners and problem solvers. Recent studies have revealed the importance of the relationship between students' affective states, cognitive processes, and performance in OELEs. Yet, the relations between students' use of cognitive processes and their corresponding affective states have not been studied in detail. In this paper, we investigate the relations between studentsż˝f affective states and the coherence in their cognitive strategies as they work on developing causal models of scientific processes in the XYZ OELE. Our analyses and results demonstrate that there are significant differences in the coherence of cognitive strategies used by high- and low-performing students. As a result, there are also significant differences in the affective states of the high- and low-performing students that are related to the coherence of their cognitive activities. This research contributes valuable empirical evidence on studentsż˝f cognitive-affective dynamics in OELEs, emphasizing the subtle ways in which students' understanding of their cognitive processes impacts their emotional reactions in learning environments.