skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


  • NSF Public Access
  • Search Results
  • Comparisons of bispectral and polarimetric retrievals of marine boundary layer cloud microphysics: case studies using a LES–satellite retrieval simulator
Title: Comparisons of bispectral and polarimetric retrievals of marine boundary layer cloud microphysics: case studies using a LES–satellite retrieval simulator
Abstract. Many passive remote-sensing techniques have beendeveloped to retrieve cloud microphysical properties from satellite-basedsensors, with the most common approaches being the bispectral andpolarimetric techniques. These two vastly different retrieval techniqueshave been implemented for a variety of polar-orbiting and geostationarysatellite platforms, providing global climatological data sets. Priorinstrument comparison studies have shown that there are systematicdifferences between the droplet size retrieval products (effective radius)of bispectral (e.g., MODIS, Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer)and polarimetric (e.g., POLDER, Polarization and Directionality of Earth'sReflectances) instruments. However, intercomparisons of airborne bispectraland polarimetric instruments have yielded results that do not appear to besystematically biased relative to one another. Diagnosing this discrepancyis complicated, because it is often difficult for instrument intercomparisonstudies to isolate differences between retrieval technique sensitivities andspecific instrumental differences such as calibration and atmosphericcorrection. In addition to these technical differences the polarimetricretrieval is also sensitive to the dispersion of the droplet sizedistribution (effective variance), which could influence the interpretationof the droplet size retrieval. To avoid these instrument-dependentcomplications, this study makes use of a cloud remote-sensing retrievalsimulator. Created by coupling a large-eddy simulation (LES) cloud modelwith a 1-D radiative transfer model, the simulator serves as a test bed forunderstanding differences between bispectral and polarimetric retrievals.With the help of this simulator we can not only compare the two techniquesto one another (retrieval intercomparison) but also validate retrievalsdirectly against the LES cloud properties. Using the satellite retrievalsimulator, we are able to verify that at high spatial resolution (50m) thebispectral and polarimetric retrievals are highly correlated with oneanother within expected observational uncertainties. The relatively smallsystematic biases at high spatial resolution can be attributed to differentsensitivity limitations of the two retrievals. In contrast, a systematicdifference between the two retrievals emerges at coarser resolution. Thisbias largely stems from differences related to sensitivity of the tworetrievals to unresolved inhomogeneities in effective variance and opticalthickness. The influence of coarse angular resolution is found to increaseuncertainty in the polarimetric retrieval but generally maintains aconstant mean value.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1726023
PAR ID:
10107432
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Volume:
11
Issue:
6
ISSN:
1867-8548
Page Range / eLocation ID:
3689 to 3715
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; (, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques)
    Abstract. Polar regions are characterized by their remoteness, making measurements challenging, but an improved knowledge of clouds and radiation is necessary to understand polar climate change. Infrared radiance spectrometers can operate continuously from the surface and have low power requirements relative to active sensors. Here we explore the feasibility of retrieving cloud height with an infrared spectrometer that would be designed for use in remote polar locations. Using a wide variety of simulated spectra of mixed-phase polar clouds at varying instrument resolutions, retrieval accuracy is explored using the CO2 slicing/sorting and the minimum local emissivity variance (MLEV) methods. In the absence of imposed errors and for clouds with optical depths greater than  ∼ 0.3, cloud-height retrievals from simulated spectra using CO2 slicing/sorting and MLEV are found to have roughly equivalent high accuracies: at an instrument resolution of 0.5cm−1, mean biases are found to be  ∼ 0.2km for clouds with bases below 2 and −0.2km for higher clouds. Accuracy is found to decrease with coarsening resolution and become worse overall for MLEV than for CO2 slicing/sorting; however, the two methods have differing sensitivity to different sources of error, suggesting an approach that combines them. For expected errors in the atmospheric state as well as both instrument noise and bias of 0.2mW/(m2srcm−1), at a resolution of 4cm−1, average retrieval errors are found to be less than  ∼ 0.5km for cloud bases within 1km of the surface, increasing to  ∼ 1.5km at 4km. This sensitivity indicates that a portable, surface-based infrared radiance spectrometer could provide an important complement in remote locations to satellite-based measurements, for which retrievals of low-level cloud are challenging. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; (, Geophysical Research Letters)
    Abstract The glory, a striking optical phenomenon seen from space in unpolarized satellite images can be mapped onto the cloud's droplet sizes with a characteristic scale of 10. Such a mapping allows us to infer the mean and variance of the cloud droplets' radius, an important property that has remained elusive and inaccessible to passive unpolarized satellite sensing. Here, we propose a simple and robust polarization‐like differential approach to map the glory's spectral properties to the desired moments of the droplet size distribution. By taking the differences between two spectrally close channels, we reduce multiple scattering contributions and amplify the single‐scattering signal, thus allowing for a simple and rapidly converging map from glory to droplet size distribution. Moreover, the droplet information reflects the upper part of the cloud, adding another sample to the traditional multiple scattering‐based retrievals that reflect droplet properties deeper in the cloud. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques)
    Abstract. The role of clouds in the Arctic radiation budget is not well understood. Ground-based and airborne measurements provide valuable data to test and improve our understanding. However, the ground-based measurements are intrinsically sparse, and the airborne observations are snapshots in time and space. Passive remote sensing measurements from satellite sensors offer high spatial coverage and an evolving time series, having lengths potentially of decades. However, detecting clouds by passive satellite remote sensing sensors is challenging over the Arctic because of the brightness of snow and ice in the ultraviolet and visible spectral regions and because of the small brightness temperature contrast to the surface. Consequently, the quality of the resulting cloud data products needs to be assessed quantitatively. In this study, we validate the cloud data products retrieved from the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) post meridiem (PM) data from the polar-orbiting NOAA-19 satellite and compare them with those derived from the ground-based instruments during the sunlit months. The AVHRR cloud data products by the European Space Agency (ESA) Cloud Climate Change Initiative (Cloud_CCI) project uses the observations in the visible and IR bands to determine cloud properties. The ground-based measurements from four high-latitude sites have been selected for this investigation: Hyytiälä (61.84∘ N, 24.29∘ E), North Slope of Alaska (NSA; 71.32∘ N, 156.61∘ W), Ny-Ålesund (Ny-Å; 78.92∘ N, 11.93∘ E), and Summit (72.59∘ N, 38.42∘ W). The liquid water path (LWP) ground-based data are retrieved from microwave radiometers, while the cloud top height (CTH) has been determined from the integrated lidar–radar measurements. The quality of the satellite products, cloud mask and cloud optical depth (COD), has been assessed using data from NSA, whereas LWP and CTH have been investigated over Hyytiälä, NSA, Ny-Å, and Summit. The Cloud_CCI COD results for liquid water clouds are in better agreement with the NSA radiometer data than those for ice clouds. For liquid water clouds, the Cloud_CCI COD is underestimated roughly by 3 optical depth (OD) units. When ice clouds are included, the underestimation increases to about 5 OD units. The Cloud_CCI LWP is overestimated over Hyytiälä by ≈7 g m−2, over NSA by ≈16 g m−2, and over Ny-Å by ≈24 g m−2. Over Summit, CCI LWP is overestimated for values ≤20 g m−2 and underestimated for values >20 g m−2. Overall the results of the CCI LWP retrievals are within the ground-based instrument uncertainties. To understand the effects of multi-layer clouds on the CTH retrievals, the statistics are compared between the single-layer clouds and all types (single-layer + multi-layer). For CTH retrievals, the Cloud_CCI product overestimates the CTH for single-layer clouds. When the multi-layer clouds are included (i.e., all types), the observed CTH overestimation becomes an underestimation of about 360–420 m. The CTH results over Summit station showed the highest biases compared to the other three sites. To understand the scale-dependent differences between the satellite and ground-based data, the Bland–Altman method is applied. This method does not identify any scale-dependent differences for all the selected cloud parameters except for the retrievals over the Summit station. In summary, the Cloud_CCI cloud data products investigated agree reasonably well with those retrieved from ground-based measurements made at the four high-latitude sites. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ; (, Geoscientific Model Development)
    null (Ed.)
    Abstract. Ground-based observatories use multisensor observations to characterize cloud and precipitation properties. One of the challenges is how to designstrategies to best use these observations to understand these properties and evaluate weather and climate models. This paper introduces the Cloud-resolving model Radar SIMulator (CR-SIM), which uses output from high-resolution cloud-resolving models (CRMs) to emulate multiwavelength,zenith-pointing, and scanning radar observables and multisensor (radar and lidar) products. CR-SIM allows for direct comparison between an atmosphericmodel simulation and remote-sensing products using a forward-modeling framework consistent with the microphysical assumptions used in the atmosphericmodel. CR-SIM has the flexibility to easily incorporate additional microphysical modules, such as microphysical schemes and scattering calculations,and expand the applications to simulate multisensor retrieval products. In this paper, we present several applications of CR-SIM for evaluating therepresentativeness of cloud microphysics and dynamics in a CRM, quantifying uncertainties in radar–lidar integrated cloud products and multi-Dopplerwind retrievals, and optimizing radar sampling strategy using observing system simulation experiments. These applications demonstrate CR-SIM as a virtual observatory operator on high-resolution model output for a consistent comparison between model results and observations to aidinterpretation of the differences and improve understanding of the representativeness errors due to the sampling limitations of the ground-basedmeasurements. CR-SIM is licensed under the GNU GPL package and both the software and the user guide are publicly available to the scientificcommunity. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Earth and Space Science)
    Abstract This study uses cloud and radiative properties collected from in situ and remote sensing instruments during two coordinated campaigns over the Southern Ocean between Tasmania and Antarctica in January–February 2018 to evaluate the simulations of clouds and precipitation in nudged‐meteorology simulations with the CAM6 and AM4 global climate models sampled at the times and locations of the observations. Fifteen SOCRATES research flights sampled cloud water content, cloud droplet number concentration, and particle size distributions in mixed‐phase boundary layer clouds at temperatures down to −25°C. The 6‐week CAPRICORN2 research cruise encountered all cloud regimes across the region. Data from vertically pointing 94 GHz radars deployed was compared with radar simulator output from both models. Satellite data were compared with simulated top‐of‐atmosphere (TOA) radiative fluxes. Both models simulate observed cloud properties fairly well within the variability of observations. Cloud base and top in both models are generally biased low. CAM6 overestimates cloud occurrence and optical thickness while cloud droplet number concentrations are biased low, leading to excessive TOA reflected shortwave radiation. In general, low clouds in CAM6 precipitate at the same frequency but are more homogeneous compared to observations. Deep clouds are better simulated but produce snow too frequently. AM4 underestimates cloud occurrence but overestimates cloud optical thickness even more than CAM6, causing excessive outgoing longwave radiation fluxes but comparable reflected shortwave radiation. AM4 cloud droplet number concentrations match observations better than CAM6. Precipitating low and deep clouds in AM4 have too little snow. Further investigation of these microphysical biases is needed for both models. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email