skip to main content
Explore Scholarly Publications and Datasets in the NSF-PAR

  • NSF Public Access
  • Search Results
  • Accepted Manuscript: Process-based flood frequency analysis in an agricultural watershed exhibiting nonstationary flood seasonality
Title: Process-based flood frequency analysis in an agricultural watershed exhibiting nonstationary flood seasonality
Abstract. Floods are the product of complex interactions among processes includingprecipitation, soil moisture, and watershed morphology. Conventional floodfrequency analysis (FFA) methods such as design storms and discharge-basedstatistical methods offer few insights into these process interactions andhow they “shape” the probability distributions of floods. Understanding andprojecting flood frequency in conditions of nonstationary hydroclimate andland use require deeper understanding of these processes, some or all ofwhich may be changing in ways that will be undersampled in observationalrecords. This study presents an alternative “process-based” FFA approachthat uses stochastic storm transposition to generate large numbers ofrealistic rainstorm “scenarios” based on relatively short rainfall remotesensing records. Long-term continuous hydrologic model simulations are usedto derive seasonally varying distributions of watershed antecedentconditions. We couple rainstorm scenarios with seasonally appropriateantecedent conditions to simulate flood frequency. The methodology is appliedto the 4002 km2 Turkey River watershed in the Midwestern United States,which is undergoing significant climatic and hydrologic change. We show that,using only 15 years of rainfall records, our methodology can produce accurateestimates of “present-day” flood frequency. We found that shifts in theseasonality of soil moisture, snow, and extreme rainfall in the Turkey Riverexert important controls on flood frequency. We also demonstrate thatprocess-based techniques may be prone to errors due to inadequaterepresentation more » of specific seasonal processes within hydrologic models. Ifsuch mistakes are avoided, however, process-based approaches can provide auseful pathway toward understanding current and future flood frequency innonstationary conditions and thus be valuable for supplementing existing FFApractices. « less
Authors:
; ; ; ;
Award ID(s):
1749638
Publication Date:
NSF-PAR ID:
10137131
Journal Name:
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Volume:
23
Issue:
5
Page Range or eLocation-ID:
2225 to 2243
ISSN:
1607-7938
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ( , Water Resources Research)
    Abstract

    Estimating the probabilities of rare floods in mountainous watersheds is challenging due to the hydrometeorological complexity of seasonally varying snowmelt and soil moisture dynamics, as well as spatiotemporal variability in extreme precipitation. Design storm methods and statistical flood frequency analyses often overlook these complexities and how they shape the probabilities of rare floods. This study presents a process‐based approach that combines gridded precipitation, stochastic storm transposition (SST), and physics‐based distributed rainfall‐runoff modeling to simulate flood peak and volume distributions up to the 10,000‐year recurrence interval and to provide insights into the hydrometeorological drivers of those events. The approach is applied to a small mountainous watershed in the Colorado Front Range in the United States. We show that storm transposition in the Front Range can be justified under existing definitions of regional precipitation homogeneity. The process‐based results show close agreement with a statistically based mixture distribution that considers underlying flood drivers. We further demonstrate that antecedent conditions and snowmelt drive frequent peak discharges and rarer flood volumes, while the upper tail of the flood peak distribution appears to be controlled by heavy rainfall and rain‐on‐snow. In particular, we highlight the important role of early fall extreme rainfall in controlling raremore »flood peaks (but not volumes), despite only one such event having been observed in recent decades. Notwithstanding issues related to the accuracy of gridded precipitation datasets, these findings highlight the potential of SST and process‐based modeling to help understand the relationships between flood drivers and flood frequencies.

    « less
  2. ; ; ; ( , Water Resources Research)
    Abstract

    Although prior studies have evaluated the role of sampling errors associated with local and regional methods to estimate peak flow quantiles, the investigation of epistemic errors is more difficult because the underlying properties of the random variable have been prescribed using ad‐hoc characterizations of the regional distributions of peak flows. This study addresses this challenge using representations of regional peak flow distributions derived from a combined framework of stochastic storm transposition, radar rainfall observations, and distributed hydrologic modeling. The authors evaluated four commonly used peak flow quantile estimation methods using synthetic peak flows at 5,000 sites in the Turkey River watershed in Iowa, USA. They first used at‐site flood frequency analysis using the Pearson Type III distribution with L‐moments. The authors then pooled regional information using (1) the index flood method, (2) the quantile regression technique, and (3) the parameter regression. This approach allowed quantification of error components stemming from epistemic assumptions, parameter estimation method, sample size, and, in the regional approaches, the number ofpooledsites. The results demonstrate that the inability to capture the spatial variability of the skewness of the peak flows dominates epistemic error for regional methods. We concluded that, in the study basin, this variability couldmore »be partially explained by river network structure and the predominant orientation of the watershed. The general approach used in this study is promising in that it brings new tools and sources of data to the study of the old hydrologic problem of flood frequency analysis.

    « less
  3. ; ; ( , Earth's Future)
    Abstract

    Computational advances have made atmospheric modeling at convection‐permitting (≤4 km) grid spacings increasingly feasible. These simulations hold great promise in the projection of climate change impacts including rainfall and flood extremes. The relatively short model runs that are currently feasible, however, inhibit the assessment of the upper tail of rainfall and flood quantiles using conventional statistical methods. Stochastic storm transposition (SST) and process‐based flood frequency analysis are two approaches that together can help to mitigate this limitation. SST generates large numbers of extreme rainfall scenarios by temporal resampling and geospatial transposition of rainfall fields from relatively short data sets. Coupling SST with process‐based flood frequency analysis enables exploration of flood behavior at a range of spatial and temporal scales. We apply these approaches with outputs of 13‐year simulations of regional climate to examine changes in extreme rainfall and flood quantiles up to the 500‐year recurrence interval in a medium‐sized watershed in the Midwestern United States. Intensification of extreme precipitation across a range of spatial and temporal scales is identified in future climate; changes in flood magnitudes depend on watershed area, with small watersheds exhibiting the greatest increases due to their limited capacity to attenuate flood peaks. Flood seasonality and snowmeltmore »are predicted to be earlier in the year under projected warming, while the most extreme floods continue to occur in early summer. Findings highlight both the potential and limitations of convection‐resolving climate models to help understand possible changes in rainfall and flood frequency across watershed scales.

    « less
  4. ; ; ; ( , Water)
    Heavy rainfall leads to severe flooding problems with catastrophic socio-economic impacts worldwide. Hydrologic forecasting models have been applied to provide alerts of extreme flood events and reduce damage, yet they are still subject to many uncertainties due to the complexity of hydrologic processes and errors in forecasted timing and intensity of the floods. This study demonstrates the efficacy of using eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) as a state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) model to forecast gauge stage levels at a 5-min interval with various look-out time windows. A flood alert system (FAS) built upon the XGBoost models is evaluated by two historical flooding events for a flood-prone watershed in Houston, Texas. The predicted stage values from the FAS are compared with observed values with demonstrating good performance by statistical metrics (RMSE and KGE). This study further compares the performance from two scenarios with different input data settings of the FAS: (1) using the data from the gauges within the study area only and (2) including the data from additional gauges outside of the study area. The results suggest that models that use the gauge information within the study area only (Scenario 1) are sufficient and advantageous in terms of their accuracy inmore »predicting the arrival times of the floods. One of the benefits of the FAS outlined in this study is that the XGBoost-based FAS can run in a continuous mode to automatically detect floods without requiring an external starting trigger to switch on as usually required by the conventional event-based FAS systems. This paper illustrates a data-driven FAS framework as a prototype that stakeholders can utilize solely based on their gauging information for local flood warning and mitigation practices.« less
  5. ; ; ; ( , Journal of Hydrometeorology)
    Abstract

    Flash flooding in the arid/semiarid southwestern United States is frequently associated with convective rainfall during the North American monsoon. In this study, we examine flood-producing storms in central Arizona based on analyses of dense rain gauge observations and stream gauging records as well as North American Regional Reanalysis fields. Our storm catalog consists of 102 storm events during the period of 1988–2014. Synoptic conditions for flood-producing storms are characterized based on principal component analyses. Four dominant synoptic modes are identified, with the first two modes explaining approximately 50% of the variance of the 500-hPa geopotential height. The transitional synoptic pattern from the North American monsoon regime to midlatitude systems is a critical large-scale feature for extreme rainfall and flooding in central Arizona. Contrasting spatial rainfall organizations and storm environment under the four synoptic modes highlights the role of interactions among synoptic conditions, mesoscale processes, and complex terrains in determining space–time variability of convective activities and flash flood hazards in central Arizona. We characterize structure and evolution properties of flood-producing storms based on storm tracking algorithms and 3D radar reflectivity. Fast-moving storm elements can be important ingredients for flash floods in the arid/semiarid southwestern United States. Contrasting storm properties formore »cloudburst storms highlight the wide spectrum of convective intensities for extreme rain rates in the arid/semiarid southwestern United States and exhibit comparable vertical structures to their counterparts in the eastern United States.

    « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email