Social media platforms provide users with various ways of interacting with each other, such as commenting, reacting to posts, sharing content, and uploading pictures. Facebook is one of the most popular platforms, and its users frequently share and reshare posts, including research articles. Moreover, the reactions feature on Facebook allows users to express their feelings towards the content they view, providing valuable data for analysis. This study aims to predict the emotional impact of Facebook posts relating to research articles. We collected data on Facebook posts related to various scientific research domains, including Health Sciences, Social Sciences, Dentistry, Arts, and Humanities. We observed Facebook users’ reactions towards research articles and posts and found that ‘Like’ reactions were the most common. We also noticed that research articles from the Dentistry research domain received a lot of ‘Haha’ reactions. We used machine learning models to predict the sentiment of Facebook posts related to research articles. We used features such as the research article’s title sentiment, abstract sentiment, abstract length, author count, and research domain to build the models. We used five classifiers: Random Forest, Decision Tree, K-Nearest Neighbors, Logistic Regression, and Naïve Bayes. The models were evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F-1 score metrics. The Random Forest classifier was the best model for two- and three-class labels, achieving accuracy measures of 86% and 66%, respectively. We also evaluated the feature importance for the Random Forest model and found that the sentiment of the research article’s title is crucial in predicting the sentiment of the Facebook post. This study has substantial implications for public engagement in science-related messages. The emotional reactions of Facebook users towards research articles and posts can provide valuable insights into public engagement in science, and predicting the emotional impact of Facebook posts related to research articles can help researchers understand how the public perceives scientific research. The findings of the study can aid researchers in effectively communicating their research and engaging the public in scientific discourse.
more »
« less
Moving Beyond Set-It-And-Forget-It Privacy Settings on Social Media
When users post on social media, they protect their privacy by choosing an access control setting that is rarely revisited. Changes in users' lives and relationships, as well as social media platforms themselves, can cause mismatches between a post's active privacy setting and the desired setting. The importance of managing this setting combined with the high volume of potential friend-post pairs needing evaluation necessitate a semi-automated approach. We attack this problem through a combination of a user study and the development of automated inference of potentially mismatched privacy settings. A total of 78 Facebook users reevaluated the privacy settings for five of their Facebook posts, also indicating whether a selection of friends should be able to access each post. They also explained their decision. With this user data, we designed a classifier to identify posts with currently incorrect sharing settings. This classifier shows a 317% improvement over a baseline classifier based on friend interaction. We also find that many of the most useful features can be collected without user intervention, and we identify directions for improving the classifier's accuracy.
more »
« less
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10148264
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS)
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 991 to 1008
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
more » « less
Photo sharing has become increasingly easy with the rise of social media. Social networking sites (SNSs), such as Instagram and Facebook, are well known for their image-sharing capabilities. However, this brings the concern of photo privacy, such as who may see the images of a user who is included in a post. Photo privacy settings offer detailed and more secure ways to share a user’s photos, however, this would require SNS users to understand these settings. To better grasp users’ understanding of photo privacy settings, we conducted a structured interview with Instagram users. We found that users were aware of the majority of the privacy settings asked about and that they accurately perceived their photo privacy safety based on their knowledge of photo privacy settings.
-
Social media companies wield power over their users through design, policy, and through their participation in public discourse. We set out to understand how companies leverage public relations to influence expectations of privacy and privacy-related norms. To interrogate the discourse productions of companies in relation to privacy, we examine the blogs associated with three major social media platforms: Facebook, Instagram (both owned by Facebook Inc.), and Snapchat. We analyze privacy-related posts using critical discourse analysis to demonstrate how these powerful entities construct narratives about users and their privacy expectations. We find that each of these platforms often make use of discourse about "vulnerable" identities to invoke relations of power, while at the same time, advancing interpretations and values that favor data capitalism. Finally, we discuss how these public narratives might influence the construction of users' own interpretations of appropriate privacy norms and conceptions of self. We contend that expectations of privacy and social norms are not simply artifacts of users' own needs and desires, but co-constructions that reflect the influence of social media companies themselves.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Many social media sites permit users to delete, edit, anonymize, or otherwise modify past posts. These mechanisms enable users to protect their privacy, but also to essentially change the past. We investigate perceptions of the necessity and acceptability of these mechanisms. Drawing on boundary-regulation theories of privacy, we first identify how users who reshared or responded to a post could be impacted by its retrospective modification. These mechanisms can cause boundary turbulence by recontextualizing past content and limiting accountability. In contrast, not permitting modification can lessen privacy and perpetuate harms of regrettable content. To understand how users perceive these mechanisms, we conducted 15 semi-structured interviews. Participants deemed retrospective modification crucial for fixing past mistakes. Nonetheless, they worried about the potential for deception through selective changes or removal. Participants were aware retrospective modification impacts others, yet felt these impacts could be minimized through context-aware usage of markers and proactive notifications.more » « less
-
Utilization of Internet in everyday life has made us vulnerable in terms of security and privacy of our data and systems. For example, large-scale data breaches have occurred at Yahoo and Equifax because of lacking of robust and secure data protection within systems. Therefore, it is imperative to find solutions to further boost data security and protect privacy of our systems. To this end, we propose to authenticate users by utilizing score-level fusions based on mouse dynamics (e.g., mouse movement on a screen) and widget interactions (e.g., when clicking or hovering over different icons on a screen) on two novel datasets. In this study, we focus on two common applications, PayPal (a money transaction website) and Facebook (a social media platform). Though we fuse the same modalities for both applications, the purpose of investigating PayPal is to demonstrate how we can authenticate users when the users interact with the app for only a short period of time, while the purpose of investigating Facebook is to authenticate users based on social media browsing activities. We have a total of 10 users for PayPal with an average of 12 minutes of data per user and a total of 15 users for Facebook with an average of 2 hours of data per user. By fusing a single mouse trajectory with the associated widget interactions that occur during the trajectory, our mean EERs (Equal Error Rates) with a score-level fusion of mouse dynamics and widget interactions are 7.64% (SVM-rbf) and 3.25% (GBM), for PayPal, and 5.49% (SVM-rbf) and 2.54% (GBM), for Facebook. To further improve the performance of our fusion, we combine decision scores from multiple consecutive trajectories, which yields a 0% mean EER after 11 decision scores across all the users for both PayPal and Facebook.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- https://doi.org/10.1145/3319535.3354202
