More Like this

1. Sparse Polynomial Hermite Interpolation

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3476446.3535501  

   Kaltofen, Erich L. ( July 2022 , ISSAC '22 Proc. 2022 ACM Internat. Symp. Symbolic Algebraic Comput.)

   Amir Hashemi (Ed.)

   We present Hermite polynomial interpolation algorithms that for a sparse univariate polynomial f with coefficients from a field compute the polynomial from fewer points than the classical algorithms. If the interpolating polynomial f has t terms, our algorithms, require argument/value triples (w^i, f(w^i), f'(w^i)) for i=0,...,t + ceiling( (t+1)/2 ) - 1, where w is randomly sampled and the probability of a correct output is determined from a degree bound for f. With f' we denote the derivative of f. Our algorithms generalize to multivariate polynomials, higher derivatives and sparsity with respect to Chebyshev polynomial bases. We have algorithms that can correct errors in the points by oversampling at a limited number of good values. If an upper bound B >= t for the number of terms is given, our algorithms use a randomly selected w and, with high probability, ceiling( t/2 ) + B triples, but then never return an incorrect output. The algorithms are based on Prony's sparse interpolation algorithm. While Prony's algorithm and its variants use fewer values, namely, 2t+1 and t+B values f(w^i), respectively, they need more arguments w^i. The situation mirrors that in algebraic error correcting codes, where the Reed-Solomon code requires fewer values thanmore »the multiplicity code, which is based on Hermite interpolation, but the Reed-Solomon code requires more distinct arguments. Our sparse Hermite interpolation algorithms can interpolate polynomials over finite fields and over the complex numbers, and from floating point data. Our Prony-based approach does not encounter the Birkhoff phenomenon of Hermite interpolation, when a gap in the derivative values causes multiple interpolants. We can interpolate from t+1 values of f and 2t-1 values of f'.« less
2. Hermite Interpolation With Error Correction: Fields of Zero or Large Characteristic and Large Error Rate

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3452143.3465525  

   Kaltofen, Erich L. ; Pernet, Clément ; Yang, Zhi-Hong ( July 2021 , ISSAC '21: Proceedings of the 2021 on International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation)

   Multiplicity code decoders are based on Hermite polynomial interpolation with error correction. In order to have a unique Hermite interpolant one assumes that the field of scalars has characteristic 0 or >= k+1, where k is the maximum order of the derivatives in the list of values of the polynomial and its derivatives which are interpolated. For scalar fields of characteristic k+1, the minimum number of values for interpolating a polynomial of degree <= D is D+1+2E(k+1) when <= E of the values are erroneous. Here we give an error-correcting Hermite interpolation algorithm that can tolerate more errors, assuming that the characteristic of the scalar field is either 0 or >= D+1. Our algorithm requires (k+1)D + 1 - (k+1)k/2 + 2E values. As an example, we consider k = 2. If the error ratio (number of errors)/(number of evaluations) <= 0.16, our new algorithm requires ceiling( (4+7/17) D - (1+8 /17) ) values, while multiplicity decoding requires 25D+25 values. If the error ratio is <= 0.2, our algorithm requires 5D-2 evaluations over characteristic 0 or >= D+1, while multiplicity decoding for an error ratio 0.2 over fields of characteristic 3 is not possible for D >= 3. Our algorithmmore »is based on Reed-Solomon interpolation without multiplicities, which becomes possible for Hermite interpolation because of the high redundancy necessary for error-correction.« less
3. Lower Bounds Against Sparse Symmetric Functions of ACC Circuits: Expanding the Reach of #SAT Algorithms

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s00224-022-10106-8  

   Vyas, Nikhil ; Williams, R. Ryan ( November 2022 , Theory of Computing Systems)

   We continue the program of proving circuit lower bounds via circuit satisfiability algorithms. So far, this program has yielded several concrete results, proving that functions in$\mathsf {Quasi}\text {-}\mathsf {NP} = \mathsf {NTIME}[n^{(\log n)^{O(1)}}]$$\mathrm{Quasi}-\mathrm{NP}=\mathrm{NTIME}\left[n^{{\left(\log n\right)}^{O\left(1\right)}}\right]$and other complexity classes do not have small circuits (in the worst case and/or on average) from various circuit classes$\mathcal { C}$$C$, by showing that$\mathcal { C}$$C$admits non-trivial satisfiability and/or#SAT algorithms which beat exhaustive search by a minor amount. In this paper, we present a new strong lower bound consequence of having a non-trivial#SAT algorithm for a circuit class${\mathcal C}$$C$. Say that a symmetric Boolean functionf(x₁,…,x_n) issparseif it outputs 1 onO(1) values of${\sum }_{i} x_{i}$${\sum }_i{x}_i$. We show that for every sparsef, and for all “typical”$\mathcal { C}$$C$, faster#SAT algorithms for$\mathcal { C}$$C$circuits imply lower bounds against the circuit class$f \circ \mathcal { C}$$f\circ C$, which may bestrongerthan$\mathcal { C}$$C$itself. In particular:

   #SAT algorithms forn^k-size$\mathcal { C}$$C$-circuits running in 2ⁿ/n^ktime (for allk) implyNEXPdoes not have$(f \circ \mathcal { C})$$(f\circ C)$-circuits of polynomial size.

   #SAT algorithms for$2^{n^{{\varepsilon }}}$$2^{n^{\epsilon }}$-size$\mathcal { C}$$C$-circuits running in$2^{n-n^{{\varepsilon }}}$$2^{n-n^{\epsilon }}$time (for someε> 0) implyQuasi-NPdoes not have$(f \circ \mathcal { C})$$(f\circ C)$-circuits of polynomial size.

   Applying#SAT algorithms from the literature, one immediate corollary of our results is thatQuasi-NPdoes not haveEMAJ∘ACC⁰∘THRcircuits of polynomialmore »size, whereEMAJis the “exact majority” function, improving previous lower bounds againstACC⁰[Williams JACM’14] andACC⁰∘THR[Williams STOC’14], [Murray-Williams STOC’18]. This is the first nontrivial lower bound against such a circuit class.

   « less
4. Individual differences and long-term consequences of tDCS augmented cognitive training

   Katz, B. ; Au, J. ; Buschkuehl, M. ; Abagis, T. ; Zabel, C. ; Jaeggi, S. ; Jonides, J. ( October 2017 , Journal of cognitive neuroscience)

   A gr e at d e al of i nt er e st s urr o u n d s t h e u s e of tr a n s cr a ni al dir e ct c urr e nt sti m ul ati o n (t D C S) t o a u g m e nt c o g niti v e tr ai ni n g. H o w e v er, eff e ct s ar e i n c o n si st e nt a cr o s s st u di e s, a n d m et aa n al yti c e vi d e n c e i s mi x e d, e s p e ci all y f o r h e alt h y, y o u n g a d ult s. O n e m aj or s o ur c e of t hi s i n c o n si st e n c y i s i n di vi d u al diff er e n c e s a m o n g t h e pmore »arti ci p a nt s, b ut t h e s e diff er e n c e s ar e r ar el y e x a mi n e d i n t h e c o nt e xt of c o m bi n e d tr ai ni n g/ sti m ul ati o n st u di e s. I n a d diti o n, it i s u n cl e ar h o w l o n g t h e eff e ct s of sti m ul ati o n l a st, e v e n i n s u c c e s sf ul i nt er v e nti o n s. S o m e st u di e s m a k e u s e of f oll o w- u p a s s e s s m e nt s, b ut v er y f e w h a v e m e a s ur e d p erf or m a n c e m or e t h a n a f e w m o nt hs aft er a n i nt er v e nti o n. H er e, w e utili z e d d at a fr o m a pr e vi o u s st u d y of t D C S a n d c o g niti v e tr ai ni n g [ A u, J., K at z, B., B u s c h k u e hl, M., B u n arj o, K., S e n g er, T., Z a b el, C., et al. E n h a n ci n g w or ki n g m e m or y tr ai ni n g wit h tr a n scr a ni al dir e ct c urr e nt sti m ul ati o n. J o u r n al of C o g niti v e N e u r os ci e n c e, 2 8, 1 4 1 9 – 1 4 3 2, 2 0 1 6] i n w hi c h p arti ci p a nts tr ai n e d o n a w or ki n g m e m or y t as k o v er 7 d a y s w hil e r e c ei vi n g a cti v e or s h a m t D C S. A n e w, l o n g er-t er m f oll o w- u p t o a ss es s l at er p erf or m a n c e w a s c o n d u ct e d, a n d a d diti o n al p arti ci p a nt s w er e a d d e d s o t h at t h e s h a m c o n diti o n w a s b ett er p o w er e d. W e a s s e s s e d b a s eli n e c o g niti v e a bilit y, g e n d er, tr ai ni n g sit e, a n d m oti v ati o n l e v el a n d f o u n d si g nifi c a nt i nt er a cti o ns b et w e e n b ot h b as eli n e a bilit y a n d m oti v ati o n wit h c o n diti o n ( a cti v e or s h a m) i n m o d els pr e di cti n g tr ai ni n g g ai n. I n a d diti o n, t h e i m pr o v e m e nt s i n t h e a cti v e c o nditi o n v er s u s s h a m c o n diti o n a p p e ar t o b e st a bl e e v e n a s l o n g a s a y e ar aft er t h e ori gi n al i nt er v e nti o n. ■« less
5. Energy Harvesting Performance of a Flapping Foil with Leading Edge Motion

   Prier, M. ( April 2019 , Dissertation)

   F or c e d at a f or a fl a p pi n g f oil e n er g y h ar v e st er wit h a cti v e l e a di n g e d g e m oti o n o p er ati n g i n t h e l o w r e d u c e d fr e q u e n c y r a n g e i s c oll e ct e d t o d et er mi n e h o w l e a di n g e d g e m oti o n aff e ct s e n er g y h ar v e sti n g p erf or m a n c e. T h e f oil pi v ot s a b o ut t h e mi dc h or d a n d o p er at e s i n t h e l o w r e d u c e d fr e q u e n c y r a n g e of 𝑓𝑓more »𝑓𝑓 / 𝑈𝑈 ∞ = 0. 0 6 , 0. 0 8, a n d 0. 1 0 wit h 𝑅𝑅 𝑅𝑅 = 2 0 ,0 0 0 − 3 0 ,0 0 0 , wit h a pit c hi n g a m plit u d e of 𝜃𝜃 0 = 7 0 ∘ , a n d a h e a vi n g a m plit u d e of ℎ 0 = 0. 5 𝑓𝑓 . It i s f o u n d t h at l e a di n g e d g e m oti o n s t h at r e d u c e t h e eff e cti v e a n gl e of att a c k e arl y t h e str o k e w or k t o b ot h i n cr e a s e t h e lift f or c e s a s w ell a s s hift t h e p e a k lift f or c e l at er i n t h e fl a p pi n g str o k e. L e a di n g e d g e m oti o n s i n w hi c h t h e eff e cti v e a n gl e of att a c k i s i n cr e a s e d e arl y i n t h e str o k e s h o w d e cr e a s e d p erf or m a n c e. I n a d diti o n a di s cr et e v ort e x m o d el wit h v ort e x s h e d di n g at t h e l e a di n g e d g e i s i m pl e m e nt f or t h e m oti o n s st u di e d; it i s f o u n d t h at t h e m e c h a ni s m f or s h e d di n g at t h e l e a di n g e d g e i s n ot a d e q u at e f or t hi s p ar a m et er r a n g e a n d t h e m o d el c o n si st e ntl y o v er pr e di ct s t h e a er o d y n a mi c f or c e s.« less