skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Ship-based measurements of ice nuclei concentrations over the Arctic, Atlantic, Pacific and Southern oceans
Abstract. Ambient concentrations of ice-forming particles measured during ship expeditions are collected and summarised with the aim of determining the spatial distribution and variability in ice nuclei in oceanic regions.The presented data from literature and previously unpublished data from over 23 months of ship-based measurements stretch from the Arctic to the Southern Ocean and include a circumnavigation of Antarctica. In comparison to continental observations, ship-based measurements of ambient ice nuclei show 1 to 2 orders of magnitude lower mean concentrations. To quantify the geographical variability in oceanic areas, the concentration range of potential ice nuclei in different climate zones is analysed by meridionally dividing the expedition tracks into tropical, temperate and polar climate zones. We find that concentrations of ice nuclei in these meridional zones follow temperature spectra with similar slopes but vary in absolute concentration. Typically, the frequency with which specific concentrations of ice nuclei are observed at a certain temperature follows a log-normal distribution. A consequence of the log-normal distribution is that the mean concentration is higher than the most frequently measured concentration. Finally, the potential contribution of ship exhaust to the measured ice nuclei concentration on board research vessels is analysed as function of temperature. We find a sharp onset of the influence at approximately −36 ∘C but none at warmer temperatures that could bias ship-based measurements.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1660486
PAR ID:
10213072
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Volume:
20
Issue:
23
ISSN:
1680-7324
Page Range / eLocation ID:
15191 to 15206
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres)
    Abstract Supercooled liquid clouds are ubiquitous over the Southern Ocean (SO), even to temperatures below −20°C, and comprise a large fraction of the marine boundary layer (MBL) clouds. Earth system models and reanalysis products have struggled to reproduce the observed cloud phase distribution and occurrence of cloud ice in the region. Recent simulations found the microphysical representation of ice nucleation and growth has a large impact on these properties, however, measurements of SO ice nucleating particles (INPs) to validate simulations are sparse. This study presents measurements of INPs from simultaneous aircraft and ship campaigns conducted over the SO in austral summer 2018, which include the first in situ observations in and above cloud in the region. Our results confirm recent observations that INP concentrations are uniformly lower than measurements made in the late 1960s. While INP concentrations below and above cloud are similar, higher ice nucleation efficiency above cloud supports model simulations that the dominant INP composition varies with height. Model parameterizations based solely on aerosol properties capture the mean relationship between INP concentration and temperature but not the observed variability, which is likely related to the only modest correlations observed between INPs and environmental or aerosol metrics. Including wind speed in addition to activation temperature in a marine INP parameterization reduces bias but does not explain the large range of observed INP concentrations. Direct and indirect inference of marine INP size suggests MBL INPs, at least during Austral summer, are dominated by particles with diameters smaller than 500 nm. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, Nature Communications)
    null (Ed.)
    Abstract Atmospheric ice nucleating particles (INPs) influence global climate by altering cloud formation, lifetime, and precipitation efficiency. The role of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) material as a source of INPs in the ambient atmosphere has not been well defined. Here, we demonstrate the potential for biogenic SOA to activate as depositional INPs in the upper troposphere by combining field measurements with laboratory experiments. Ambient INPs were measured in a remote mountaintop location at –46 °C and an ice supersaturation of 30% with concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 70 L –1 . Concentrations of depositional INPs were positively correlated with the mass fractions and loadings of isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosols. Compositional analysis of ice residuals showed that ambient particles with isoprene-derived SOA material can act as depositional ice nuclei. Laboratory experiments further demonstrated the ability of isoprene-derived SOA to nucleate ice under a range of atmospheric conditions. We further show that ambient concentrations of isoprene-derived SOA can be competitive with other INP sources. This demonstrates that isoprene and potentially other biogenically-derived SOA materials could influence cirrus formation and properties. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics)
    Abstract. We present a framework for estimating concentrations of episodicallyelevated high-temperature marine ice nucleating particles (INPs) in the seasurface microlayer and their subsequent emission into the atmosphericboundary layer. These episodic INPs have been observed in multipleship-based and coastal field campaigns, but the processes controlling theirocean concentrations and transfer to the atmosphere are not yet fullyunderstood. We use a combination of empirical constraints and simulationoutputs from an Earth system model to explore different hypotheses forexplaining the variability of INP concentrations, and the occurrence ofepisodic INPs, in the marine atmosphere. In our calculations, we examine the following two proposed oceanic sources of high-temperature INPs: heterotrophic bacteria and marine biopolymer aggregates (MBPAs). Furthermore, we assume that the emission of these INPs is determined by the production of supermicron sea spray aerosol formed from jet drops, with an entrainment probability that is described by Poisson statistics. The concentration of jet drops is derived from the number concentration of supermicron sea spray aerosol calculated from model runs. We then derive the resulting number concentrations of marine high-temperature INPs (at 253 K) in the atmospheric boundary layer and compare their variability to atmospheric observations of INP variability. Specifically, we compare against concentrations of episodically occurring high-temperature INPs observed during field campaigns in the Southern Ocean, the Equatorial Pacific, and the North Atlantic. In this case study, we evaluate our framework at 253 K because reliable observational data at this temperature are available across three different ocean regions, but suitable data are sparse at higher temperatures. We find that heterotrophic bacteria and MBPAs acting as INPs provide only apartial explanation for the observed high INP concentrations. We note,however, that there are still substantial knowledge gaps, particularlyconcerning the identity of the oceanic INPs contributing most frequently toepisodic high-temperature INPs, their specific ice nucleation activity, andthe enrichment of their concentrations during the sea–air transfer process. Therefore, targeted measurements investigating the composition of these marine INPs and drivers for their emissions are needed, ideally incombination with modeling studies focused on the potential cloud impacts ofthese high-temperature INPs. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; (, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene)
    The ship-based experiment MOSAiC 2019/2020 was carried out during a full year in the Arctic and yielded an excellent data set to test the parameterizations of ocean/sea-ice/atmosphere interaction processes in regional climate models (RCMs). In the present paper, near-surface data during MOSAiC are used for the verification of the RCM COnsortium for Small-scale MOdel–Climate Limited area Mode (COSMO-CLM or CCLM). CCLM is used in a forecast mode (nested in ERA5) for the whole Arctic with 15 km resolution and is run with different configurations of sea ice data. These include the standard sea ice concentration taken from passive microwave data with around 6 km resolution, sea ice concentration from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) thermal infrared data and MODIS sea ice lead fraction data for the winter period. CCLM simulations show a good agreement with the measurements. Relatively large negative biases for temperature occur for November and December, which are likely associated with a too large ice thickness used by CCLM. The consideration of sea ice leads in the sub-grid parameterization in CCLM yields improved results for the near-surface temperature. ERA5 data show a large warm bias of about 2.5°C and an underestimation of the temperature variability. 
    more » « less
  5. (, NSF Arctic Data Center)
    This dataset includes statistically resampled monthly time series data of Arctic sea ice area and gridded data for March and September for sea ice concentration for a selection of large ensemble climate models and observational datasets. Arctic sea ice concentrations and areas are resampled from all available members of six coupled climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5). These six models are: The second generation Canadian Earth System Model (CanESM2), The Community Earth System Mode version 1 (CESM1), The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Global Climate Model Mark 3.6 (CSIRO MK3.6), The Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Coupled Climate Model version 3 (GFDL CM3), Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Earth System Model version 2 with Modular Ocean Model version 4.1 (GFDL ESM2M), Max Planck Institute Earth System Model version 1 (MPI ESM1). The Four observational datasets are The Hadley Centre Sea Ice and Sea Surface Temperature data set version 1 (HadISST1), The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and National Snow and Ice Data Center Climate Data Record Version 4 (CDR), The The National Aeronautics and Space Administration Team Algorithm (NT), and the The National Aeronautics and Space Administration Bootstrap Team Algorithm (BT). The sea ice area data is resampled 10,000 times and then the standard deviation of those resamplings is calculated, which can be considered analagous to interannual variability of sea ice area (SIA). The standard deviation (sigma) and mean (mu) of these data represent the variability and typical values respectively of interannual variability found in each ensemble member or observational dataset. Sea ice concentration is resampled 1000 times with the same standard deviation and mean metrics for sea ice concentration. This dataset was created to evaluate climate model projections of Arctic sea ice interannual variability and is used in the article Wyburn-Powell, Jahn, England (2022), Modeled Interannual Variability of Arctic Sea Ice Cover is Within Observational Uncertainty, Journal of Climate, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0958.1. This work was conducted at the University of Colorado Boulder from 2020-2022. The figures from the Journal of Climate article can be reproduced from the following datasets. The code used to create the datasets can be located at https://www.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6687725. - Figure 1: Sigma_obs_SIA.nc - Figure 2: Sigma_obs_SIA.nc, Mu_obs_SIA.nc, Sigma_mem_SIA.nc, Mu_mem_SIA.nc - Figure 3: Sigma_mem_varying_time_periods_1965_2066_03.nc, Sigma_LE_varying_time_periods_1965_2066_03.nc, Sigma_LE_varying_time_periods_1970_2040_09.nc, Sigma_obs_varying_time_periods_1953_2020.nc - Figure 4: Sigma_obs_SIA.nc, Sigma_mem_SIA.nc - Figure 5: Sigma_obs_SIA.nc - Figure 6: <model_name>_resampled_0<month>_individual.nc, <observational_dataset>_resampled_individual_1979_2020_03_09.nc - Figure 7: Sigma_obs_SIA.nc, Mu_obs_SIA.nc, Sigma_mem_SIA.nc, Mu_mem_SIA.nc - Figure 8: <model_name>_resampled_0<month>_individual.nc, <observational_dataset>_resampled_individual_1979_2020_03_09.nc - Figure 9: Sigma_mem_SIA.nc, Sigma_LE_SIA.nc 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email