An official website of the United States government
Premise of the StudyNew growth in the spring requires resource mobilization in the vascular system at a time when xylem and phloem function are often reduced in seasonally cold climates. As a result, the timing of leaf out and/or flowering could depend on when the vascular system resumes normal function in the spring. This study investigated whether flowering time is influenced by vascular phenology in plants that flower precociously before they have leaves. MethodsFlower, leaf, and vascular phenology were monitored in pairs of precocious and non‐precocious congeners. Differences in resource allocation were quantified by measuring bud dry mass and water content throughout the year, floral hydration was modelled, and a girdling treatment completed on branches in the field. Key ResultsPrecocious flowering species invested more in floral buds the year before flowering than did their non‐precocious congeners, thus mobilizing less water in the spring, which allowed flowering before new vessel maturation. ConclusionsA shift in the timing of resource allocation in precocious flowering plants allowed them to flower before the production of mature vessels and minimized the significance of seasonal changes in vascular function to their flowering phenology. The low investment required to complete floral development in the spring when the plant vascular system is often compromised could explain why flowers can emerge before leaf out.
more »
« less
Do longer growing seasons give introduced plants an advantage over native plants in Interior Alaska?
In interior Alaska, increases in growing season length and rapid expansion of introduced species are altering the environment for native plants. We evaluated whether earlier springs, warmer summers, and extended autumns alter the phenology of leaves and flowers in native and introduced forbs and shrubs in the boreal understory and open-canopy habitats, and whether the responses provide an advantage to either group. We tracked the phenology of 29 native and 12 introduced species over three years with very different spring, summer, and autumn conditions. The native species produced flowers (but not leaves) earlier than the introduced species, and both groups advanced leaf-out and flowering in the early-snowmelt year. However, shifts in phenology between early and late years were similar for both groups. There was no increase in fruit development rate for either group in the warm summer. In contrast, in the year with the extended autumn, the introduced plants extended leaf production and time of senescence much more than native species. While growth form and leaf habit could explain the differences in phenology between native and introduced groups in spring and summer, these traits could not account for differences in autumn. We conclude that in boreal Alaska extended autumns may benefit introduced species more than native ones.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1636476
- PAR ID:
- 10213161
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Botany
- Volume:
- 97
- Issue:
- 6
- ISSN:
- 1916-2790
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 347 to 362
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Many plants are responding to increases in spring temperatures by advancing their leaf‐out and flowering times in temperate regions around the world. The magnitudes of species' sensitivities to temperature vary widely, and patterns within that variation can illuminate underlying phenological drivers related to species' life histories and local‐scale adaptations.The USA National Phenology Network (USA‐NPN) and the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) are two rapidly growing, taxonomically and geographically extensive phenology data resources in the USA that offer opportunities to explore emergent properties of spring phenology. Using observations of leaf‐out and flowering in temperate deciduous plant species from USA‐NPN (2009–2024) and NEON (2014–2022), we estimated species‐level flowering (n = 164) and leaf‐out (n = 136) sensitivities to temperatures of the preceding months, obtained through PRISM. We used the results to assess differences in sensitivities between the two datasets and among life history traits (e.g. introduced or native status, seasonal timing and growth habit) and to explore latitudinal patterns in sensitivity among and within species. We found significant relationships between temperature and leaf‐out phenology (2009–2024 for 109 (80%) species, ranging from −7.4 to −1.3 days/°C, and between temperature and flowering phenology for 140 (85%) species, ranging from −8.0 to −1.1 days/°C. Plant sensitivities were highly consistent among the USA‐NPN and NEON datasets, suggesting these datasets can be reasonably combined to expand the coverage of publicly available phenological data across the USA. Introduced species showed stronger sensitivity to temperature than native species for both leaf‐out (−0.8 days/°C difference) and flowering (−0.7 days/°C difference). The strongest (i.e. most negative) leaf‐out sensitivities to temperature were associated with earlier leaf‐out dates and strong flowering sensitivities. Latitudinal analyses within and across species indicate that flowering and leaf‐out sensitivities are both stronger at lower latitudes. Synthesis. Phenological ‘big data’ encompassing over 100 species across the eastern USA shows that leaf‐out and flowering occur earlier with warmer temperatures and that native species and individuals at high latitudes tend to have weaker temperature sensitivities than introduced species and more southern plants; these findings suggest adaptations within and across species to avoid leafing out and flowering under harsh environmental conditions.more » « less
-
Summary In seasonally cold climates, many woody plants tolerate chilling and freezing temperatures by ceasing growth, shedding leaves and entering dormancy. At the same time, transport within these plants often decreases as the vascular system exhibits reduced functionality. As spring growth requires water and nutrients, we ask the question: how much does bud, leaf and flower development depend on the vasculature in spring? In this review, we present what is known about leaf, flower and vascular phenology to sort out this question. In early stages of bud development, buds rely on internal resources and do not appear to require vascular support. The situation changes during organ expansion, after leaves and flowers reconnect to the stem vascular system. However, there are major gaps in our understanding of the timing of vascular development, especially regarding the phloem, as well as the synchronization among leaves, flowers, stem and root vasculature. We believe these gaps are mainly the outcome of research completed in silo and urge future work to take a more integrative approach. We highlight current challenges and propose future directions to make rapid progress on this important topic in upcoming years.more » « less
-
Abstract A wave of green leaves and multi‐colored flowers advances from low to high latitudes each spring. However, little is known about how flowering offset (i.e., ending of flowering) and duration of populations of the same species vary along environmental gradients. Understanding these patterns is critical for predicting the effects of future climate and land‐use change on plants, pollinators, and herbivores. Here, we investigated potential climatic and landscape drivers of flowering onset, offset, and duration of 52 plant species with varying key traits. We generated phenology estimates using >270,000 community‐science photographs and a novel presence‐only phenometric estimation method. We found longer flowering durations in warmer areas, which is more obvious for summer‐blooming species compared to spring‐bloomers driven by their strongly differing offset dynamics. We also found that higher human population density and higher annual precipitation are associated with delayed flowering offset and extended flowering duration. Finally, offset of woody perennials was more sensitive than herbaceous species to both climate and urbanization drivers. Empirical forecast models suggested that flowering durations will be longer in 2030 and 2050 under representative concentration pathway (RCP) 8.5, especially for summer‐blooming species. Our study provides critical insight into drivers of key flowering phenophases and confirms that Hopkins’ Bioclimatic Law also applies to flowering durations for summer‐blooming species and herbaceous spring‐blooming species.more » « less
-
Although many species shift their phenology with climate change, species vary significantly in the direction and magnitude of these responses (i.e., phenological sensitivity). Studies increasingly detect early phenology or high phenological sensitivity to climate in non-native species, which may favor non-native species over natives in warming climates. Yet relatively few studies explicitly compare phenological responses to climate between native vs. non-native species or between non-native populations in the native vs. introduced range, limiting our ability to quantify the role of phenology in invasion success. Here, we review the empirical evidence for and against differences in phenology and phenological sensitivity to climate in both native vs. non-native species and native and introduced populations of non-native species. Contrary to common assumptions, native and non-native plant species did not consistently differ in mean phenology or phenological sensitivity. However, non-native plant species were often either just as or more sensitive, but rarely less sensitive, to climate as natives. Introduced populations of non-native plant species often show earlier reproduction than native populations of the same species, but there was mixed evidence for differences in phenological sensitivity between introduced and native plant populations. We found very few studies comparing native vs. invasive animal phenology. Future work should characterize phenological sensitivity to climate in native vs. non-native plant and animal species, in native vs. introduced populations of non-native species, and across different stages of invasion, and should carefully consider how differences in phenology might promote invasion success or disadvantage native species under climate change.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2018-0209
