An official website of the United States government
Mechanisms for hydrodynamic benefit via fluid interactions in large planar fish schools ( n ≥ 10) are investigated by two-dimensional numerical simulations of carangiform fish swimming. It is observed that the average swimming efficiency of the 10-fish school is increased by 30% over a single swimmer, along with a thrust production improvement of 114%. The performance and flow analyses characterize the associated hydrodynamic interaction mechanisms in large dense schools leading to enhanced performance. First, anterior body suction arises from the proximity of the suction side of the flapping tail to the head of the following fish. Next, the block effect is observed as another fish body blocks the flow behind a fish. Finally, the wall effect enhances the flow of momentum downstream where the body of a neighboring fish acts as a wall for the flapping of a fish tail moving toward it. Because these primary body–body interactions are based on the arrangement of surrounding fish, a classification of the individual fish within the school is presented based on the intra-fish interactions and is reflected in the performance of the individuals. It is shown that the school can be separated as front fish, middle fish, edge fish, and back fish based on the geometric position, performance, and wake characteristics. Finally, groupings and mechanisms observed are proven to be consistent over a range of Reynolds numbers and school arrangements.
more »
« less
Tail beat synchronization during schooling requires a functional lateral line system in giant danios, Devario aequipinnatus
Abstract Swimming in schools has long been hypothesized to allow fish to save energy. Fish must exploit the energy from the wakes of their neighbors for maximum energy savings, a feat that requires them to both synchronize their tail movements and stay in certain positions relative to their neighbors. To maintain position in a school, we know that fish use multiple sensory systems, mainly their visual and flow sensing lateral line system. However, how fish synchronize their swimming movements in a school is still not well understood. Here we test the hypothesis that this synchronization may depend on functional differences in the two branches of the lateral line sensory system that detects water movements close to the fish’s body. The anterior branch, located on the head, encounters largely undisturbed free-stream flow, while the posterior branch, located on the trunk and tail, encounters flow that has been affected strongly by the tail movement. Thus, we hypothesize that the anterior branch may be more important for regulating position within the school, while the posterior branch may be more important for synchronizing tail movements. Our study examines functional differences in the anterior and posterior lateral line in the structure and tail synchronization of fish schools. We used a widely available aquarium fish that schools, the giant danio, Devario equipinnatus. Fish swam in a large circular tank where stereoscopic videos recordings were used to reconstruct the 3 D position of each individual within the school and to track tail kinematics to quantify synchronization. For one fish in each school, we ablated using cobalt chloride either the anterior region only, the posterior region only, or the entire lateral line system. We observed that ablating any region of the lateral line system causes fish to swim in a “box” or parallel swimming formation, which was different from the diamond formation observed in normal fish. Ablating only the anterior region did not substantially reduce tail beat synchronization but ablating only the posterior region caused fish to stop synchronizing their tail beats, largely because the tail beat frequency increased dramatically. Thus, the anterior and posterior lateral line system appear to have different behavioral functions in fish. Most importantly, we showed that the posterior lateral line system played a major role in determining tail beat synchrony in schooling fish. Without synchronization, swimming efficiency decreases, which can have an impact on the fitness of the individual fish and group.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1652582
- PAR ID:
- 10246758
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Integrative and Comparative Biology
- ISSN:
- 1540-7063
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Fish schooling has attracted the interest of the scientific community for centuries. Energy savings have been long posited to be a key determinant for the emergence of schooling patterns. Yet, current methodologies do not allow the precise quantification of the metabolic rate of specific individuals within the school, typically leaving researchers with only a single, global measurement of metabolic rate for the collective. In this paper, we demonstrate the feasibility of inferring metabolic rate of swimming fish using the mouth‐opening frequency, a simple proxy that can be scored utilizing video recordings in the laboratory or in the field, even for small fish. The mouth‐opening frequency is independent of hydrodynamic interactions within the school, thereby mitigating potential confounding factors that arise when using locomotory measures associated with tail‐beat motion. We assessed the reliability of mouth‐opening frequency as a proxy for metabolic rate by conducting experiments on zebrafish (Danio rerio) using swimming respirometry. We varied the flow speed from 0.8 to 3.2 body lengths per second and extracted tail‐beat motion and mouth opening from video recordings. Our results revealed a strong correlation between oxygen uptake and mouth‐opening frequency for nonzero flow speeds but not in quiescent water. Contrary to our expectations, we did not find evidence in favor of the use of tail‐beat frequency as a proxy for metabolic rate. Overall, our results open the door to the study of individual metabolic rates in fish schools without confounding factors related to hydrodynamic interactions.more » « less
-
Abstract Many aquatic animals swim by undulatory body movements and understanding the diversity of these movements could unlock the potential for designing better underwater robots. Here, we analyzed the steady swimming kinematics of a diverse group of fish species to investigate whether their undulatory movements can be represented using a series of interconnected multi-segment models, and if so, to identify the key factors driving the segment configuration of the models. Our results show that the steady swimming kinematics of fishes can be described successfully using parsimonious models, 83% of which had fewer than five segments. In these models, the anterior segments were significantly longer than the posterior segments, and there was a direct link between segment configuration and swimming kinematics, body shape, and Reynolds number. The models representing eel-like fishes with elongated bodies and fishes swimming at high Reynolds numbers had more segments and less segment length variability along the body than the models representing other fishes. These fishes recruited their anterior bodies to a greater extent, initiating the undulatory wave more anteriorly. Two shape parameters, related to axial and overall body thickness, predicted segment configuration with moderate to high success rate. We found that head morphology was a good predictor of its segment length. While there was a large variation in head segments, the length of tail segments was similar across all models. Given that fishes exhibited variable caudal fin shapes, the consistency of tail segments could be a result of an evolutionary constraint tuned for high propulsive efficiency. The bio-inspired multi-segment models presented in this study highlight the key bending points along the body and can be used to decide on the placement of actuators in fish-inspired robots, to model hydrodynamic forces in theoretical and computational studies, or for predicting muscle activation patterns during swimming.more » « less
-
Understanding the role of hydrodynamic interactions in fish swimming may help explain why and how fish swim in schools. In this work, we designed controlled experiments to study fish swimming in a disturbed flow. Specifically, we recorded the tail beat frequency of a fish swimming in the presence of an actively-controlled airfoil pitching at varying frequencies. We propose an information-theoretic approach to quantify the influence of the motion of the pitching airfoil on the animal swimming. The theoretical framework developed in this work may inform future investigations on the mechanisms underlying schooling in groups.more » « less
-
The anterior body of many fishes is shaped like an airfoil turned on its side. With an oscillating angle to the swimming direction, such an airfoil experiences negative pressure due to both its shape and pitching movements. This negative pressure acts as thrust forces on the anterior body. Here, we apply a high-resolution, pressure-based approach to describe how two fishes, bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirusRafinesque) and brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalisMitchill), swimming in the carangiform mode, the most common fish swimming mode, generate thrust on their anterior bodies using leading-edge suction mechanics, much like an airfoil. These mechanics contrast with those previously reported in lampreys—anguilliform swimmers—which produce thrust with negative pressure but do so through undulatory mechanics. The thrust produced on the anterior bodies of these carangiform swimmers through negative pressure comprises 28% of the total thrust produced over the body and caudal fin, substantially decreasing the net drag on the anterior body. On the posterior region, subtle differences in body shape and kinematics allow trout to produce more thrust than bluegill, suggesting that they may swim more effectively. Despite the large phylogenetic distance between these species, and differences near the tail, the pressure profiles around the anterior body are similar. We suggest that such airfoil-like mechanics are highly efficient, because they require very little movement and therefore relatively little active muscular energy, and may be used by a wide range of fishes since many species have appropriately shaped bodies.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icab071
