Grieff, S.
(Ed.)
Recently there has been increased development of curriculum and tools that integrate computing (C) into Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) learning environments. These environments serve as a catalyst for authentic collaborative problem-solving (CPS) and help students synergistically learn STEM+C content. In this work, we analyzed students’ collaborative problem-solving behaviors as they worked in pairs to construct computational models in kinematics. We leveraged social measures, such as equity and turn-taking, along with a domain-specific measure that quantifies the synergistic interleaving of science and computing concepts in the students’ dialogue to gain a deeper understanding of the relationship between students’ collaborative behaviors and their ability to complete a STEM+C computational modeling task.
Our results extend past findings identifying the importance of synergistic dialogue and suggest
that while equitable discourse is important for overall task success, fluctuations in equity and
turn-taking at the segment level may not have an impact on segment-level task performance.
To better understand students’ segment-level behaviors, we identified and characterized groups’
planning, enacting, and reflection behaviors along with monitoring processes they employed to
check their progress as they constructed their models. Leveraging Markov Chain (MC) analysis,
we identified differences in high- and low-performing groups’ transitions between these phases
of students’ activities. We then compared the synergistic, turn-taking, and equity measures for
these groups for each one of the MC model states to gain a deeper understanding of how these
collaboration behaviors relate to their computational modeling performance. We believe that
characterizing differences in collaborative problem-solving behaviors allows us to gain a better
understanding of the difficulties students face as they work on their computational modeling
tasks.
more »
« less