More Like this

1. Open-world continual learning: Unifying novelty detection and continual learning

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2024.104237  

   Kim, Gyuhak; Xiao, Changnan; Konishi, Tatsuya; Ke, Zixuan; Liu, Bing (January 2025, Artificial Intelligence)

   As AI agents are increasingly used in the real open world with unknowns or novelties, they need the ability to (1) recognize objects that (a) they have learned before and (b) detect items that they have never seen or learned, and (2) learn the new items incrementally to become more and more knowledgeable and powerful. (1) is called novelty detection or out-of-distribution (OOD) detection and (2) is called class incremental learning (CIL), which is a setting of continual learning (CL). In existing research, OOD detection and CIL are regarded as two completely different problems. This paper first provides a theoretical proof that good OOD detection for each task within the set of learned tasks (called closed-world OOD detection) is necessary for successful CIL. We show this by decomposing CIL into two sub-problems: within-task prediction (WP) and task-id prediction (TP), and proving that TP is correlated with closed-world OOD detection. The key theoretical result is that regardless of whether WP and OOD detection (or TP) are defined explicitly or implicitly by a CIL algorithm, good WP and good closed-world OOD detection are necessary and sufficient conditions for good CIL, which unifies novelty or OOD detection and continual learning (CIL, in particular). We call this traditional CIL the closed-world CIL as it does not detect future OOD data in the open world. The paper then proves that the theory can be generalized or extended to open-world CIL, which is the proposed open-world continual learning, that can perform CIL in the open world and detect future or open-world OOD data. Based on the theoretical results, new CIL methods are also designed, which outperform strong baselines in CIL accuracy and in continual OOD detection by a large margin. 

   more » « less
2. On the Value of Out-of-Distribution Testing: An Example of Goodhart's Law

   Teney, D.; Kafle, K.; Shrestha, R.; Abbasnejad, E.; Kanan, C.; van den Hengel, A. (January 2020, Neural Information and Processing Systems (NeurIPS))

   null (Ed.)

   Out-of-distribution (OOD) testing is increasingly popular for evaluating a machine learning system's ability to generalize beyond the biases of a training set. OOD benchmarks are designed to present a different joint distribution of data and labels between training and test time. VQA-CP has become the standard OOD benchmark for visual question answering, but we discovered three troubling practices in its current use. First, most published methods rely on explicit knowledge of the construction of the OOD splits. They often rely on ``inverting'' the distribution of labels, e.g. answering mostly 'yes' when the common training answer is 'no'. Second, the OOD test set is used for model selection. Third, a model's in-domain performance is assessed after retraining it on in-domain splits (VQA v2) that exhibit a more balanced distribution of labels. These three practices defeat the objective of evaluating generalization, and put into question the value of methods specifically designed for this dataset. We show that embarrassingly-simple methods, including one that generates answers at random, surpass the state of the art on some question types. We provide short- and long-term solutions to avoid these pitfalls and realize the benefits of OOD evaluation. 

   more » « less
3. Asymmetry Learning for Counterfactually-invariant Classification in OOD Tasks

   Mouli, S Chandra; Ribeiro, Bruno (April 2022, International Conference on Learning Representations)

   Generalizing from observed to new related environments (out-of-distribution) is central to the reliability of classifiers. However, most classifiers fail to predict label from input when the change in environment is due a (stochastic) input transformation not observed in training, as in training we observe , where is a hidden variable. This work argues that when the transformations in train and test are (arbitrary) symmetry transformations induced by a collection of known equivalence relations, the task of finding a robust OOD classifier can be defined as finding the simplest causal model that defines a causal connection between the target labels and the symmetry transformations that are associated with label changes. We then propose a new learning paradigm, asymmetry learning, that identifies which symmetries the classifier must break in order to correctly predict in both train and test. Asymmetry learning performs a causal model search that, under certain identifiability conditions, finds classifiers that perform equally well in-distribution and out-of-distribution. Finally, we show how to learn counterfactually-invariant representations with asymmetry learning in two physics tasks. 

   more » « less
4. Asymmetry Learning for Counterfactually-invariant Classification in OOD Tasks

   Mouli, S Chandra; Ribeiro, Bruno (April 2022, International Conference on Learning Representations)

   Generalizing from observed to new related environments (out-of-distribution) is central to the reliability of classifiers. However, most classifiers fail to predict label from input when the change in environment is due a (stochastic) input transformation not observed in training, as in training we observe , where is a hidden variable. This work argues that when the transformations in train and test are (arbitrary) symmetry transformations induced by a collection of known equivalence relations, the task of finding a robust OOD classifier can be defined as finding the simplest causal model that defines a causal connection between the target labels and the symmetry transformations that are associated with label changes. We then propose a new learning paradigm, asymmetry learning, that identifies which symmetries the classifier must break in order to correctly predict in both train and test. Asymmetry learning performs a causal model search that, under certain identifiability conditions, finds classifiers that perform equally well in-distribution and out-of-distribution. Finally, we show how to learn counterfactually-invariant representations with asymmetry learning in two physics tasks. 

   more » « less
5. MUTANT: A Training Paradigm for Out-of-Distribution Generalization in Visual Question Answering

   https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.63  

   Gokhale, Tejas; Banerjee, Pratyay; Baral, Chitta; Yang, Yezhou (January 2020, Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP))

   null (Ed.)

   While progress has been made on the visual question answering leaderboards, models often utilize spurious correlations and priors in datasets under the i.i.d. setting. As such, evaluation on out-of-distribution (OOD) test samples has emerged as a proxy for generalization. In this paper, we present \textit{MUTANT}, a training paradigm that exposes the model to perceptually similar, yet semantically distinct \textit{mutations} of the input, to improve OOD generalization, such as the VQA-CP challenge. Under this paradigm, models utilize a consistency-constrained training objective to understand the effect of semantic changes in input (question-image pair) on the output (answer). Unlike existing methods on VQA-CP, \textit{MUTANT} does not rely on the knowledge about the nature of train and test answer distributions. \textit{MUTANT} establishes a new state-of-the-art accuracy on VQA-CP with a 10.57{\%} improvement. Our work opens up avenues for the use of semantic input mutations for OOD generalization in question answering. 

   more » « less