Passive trunk exoskeletons support the human body with mechanical elements like springs and trunk compression, allowing them to guide motion and relieve the load on the spine. However, to provide appropriate support, elements of the exoskeleton (e.g., degree of compression) should be intelligently adapted to the current task. As it is not currently clear how adjusting different exoskeleton elements affects the wearer, this study preliminarily examines the effects of simultaneously adjusting both exoskeletal spinal column stiffness and trunk compression in a passive trunk exoskeleton. Six participants performed four dynamic tasks (walking, sit-to-stand, lifting a 20-lb box, lifting a 40-lb box) and experienced unexpected perturbations both without the exoskeleton and in six exoskeleton configurations corresponding to two compression levels and three stiffness levels. While results are preliminary due to the small sample size and relatively small increases in stiffness, they indicate that both compression and stiffness may affect kinematics and electromyography, that the effects may differ between activities, and that there may be interaction effects between stiffness and compression. As the next step, we will conduct a larger study with the same protocol more participants and larger stiffness increases to systematically evaluate the effects of different exoskeleton characteristics on the wearer.Clinical Relevance- Trunk exoskeletons can support wearers during a variety of different tasks, but their configuration may need to be intelligently adjusted to provide appropriate support. This pilot study provides information about the effects of exoskeleton back stiffness and trunk compression on the wearer, which can be used as a basis for more effective device design and usage.
more »
« less
Design and Pilot Evaluation of a Prototype Sensorized Trunk Exoskeleton
Trunk exoskeletons are wearable devices that support wearers during physically demanding tasks by reducing biomechanical loads and increasing stability. In this paper, we present a prototype sensorized passive trunk exoskeleton, which includes five motion processing units (3-axis accelerometers and gyroscopes with onboard digital processing), four one-axis flex sensors along the exoskeletal spinal column, and two one-axis force sensors for measuring the interaction force between the wearer and exoskeleton. A pilot evaluation of the exoskeleton was conducted with two wearers, who performed multiple everyday tasks (sitting on a chair and standing up, walking in a straight line, picking up a box with a straight back, picking up a box with a bent back, bending forward while standing, bending laterally while standing) while wearing the exoskeleton. Illustrative examples of the results are presented as graphs. Finally, potential applications of the sensorized exoskeleton as the basis for a semi-active exoskeleton design or for audio/haptic feedback to guide the wearer are discussed.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2151465
- PAR ID:
- 10313190
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Proceedings of the 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
null (Ed.)Wearable robots are an emerging form of technology that allow organizations to combine the strength, precision, and performance of machines with the flexibility, intelligence, and problem-solving abilities of human wearers. Active exoskeletons are a type of wearable robot that gives wearers the ability to effortlessly lift up to 200 lbs., as well as perform other types of physically demanding tasks that would be too strenuous for most humans. Synchronization between exoskeleton suits and wearers is one of the most challenging requirements to operate these technologies effectively. In this conceptual paper, we extend interpersonal adaption theory (IAT) to the exoskeleton context and explicate (a) the antecedents that are most likely to shape synchrony in human-exoskeleton interactions, (b) automatic and strategic synchrony as adaptive behaviors in human-exoskeleton interactions, and (c) outcome variables that are especially important in these processes. Lastly, we offer a discussion of key methodological challenges for measuring synchrony in human-exoskeleton interactions and offer a future research agenda for this important area.more » « less
-
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are a leading cause of injury for workers who are performing physically demanding and repetitive construction tasks. With recent advances in robotics, wearable robots are introduced into the construction industry to mitigate the risk of WMSDs by correcting the workers’ postures and reducing the load exerted on their body joints. While wearable robots promise to reduce the muscular and physical demands on workers to perform tasks, there is a lack of understanding of the impact of wearable robots on worker ergonomics. This lack of understanding may lead to new ergonomic injuries for worker swearing exoskeletons. To bridge this gap, this study aims to assess the workers’ ergonomic risk when using a wearable robot (back-support exoskeleton) in one of the most common construction tasks, material handling. In this research, a vision-based pose estimation algorithm was developed to estimate the pose of the worker while wearing a back-support exoskeleton. As per the estimated pose, joint angles between connected body parts were calculated. Then, the worker’s ergonomic risk was assessed from the calculated angles based on the Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) method. Results showed that using the back-support exoskeleton reduced workers’ ergonomic risk by 31.7% by correcting awkward postures of the trunk and knee during material handling tasks, compared to not using the back-support exoskeleton. The results are expected to facilitate the implementation of wearable robots in the construction industry.more » « less
-
more » « less
We explored the feasibility of using biomechanical simulations to predict altered spinal forces resulting from wearing a back-support exoskeleton (BSE) during repetitive lifting tasks. Twenty (10M, 10F) young, healthy participants completed repetitive lifting task, while wearing a BSE (‘with EXO’) and without wearing a BSE (‘without EXO’). Spinal forces were estimated by applying the BSE torque profile to body kinematics measured in ‘with EXO’ condition, while spinal forces were simulated by applying the same torque profile to body kinematics measured in ‘without EXO’ condition. Simulated compression force was higher than estimated compression force, probably due to lower trunk flexion angle in ‘without EXO’ condition. Such differences were larger among women than among men. However, simulated shear force was comparable with estimated shear force. Future works further need to compare simulated and estimated spinal forces for different BSEs (e.g., soft BSE), asymmetric lifting tasks, and different age group.
-
more » « less
We investigated how novices’ perception of exoskeleton usefulness changes with different types of exposure to an exoskeleton; and when the biomechanical benefits and limitations of potential exoskeleton use are presented to them. Twenty young, healthy participants completed this study. The three types of informational exposures to a back-support exoskeleton (BSE) were: (1) Information-based, (2) Virtual Reality (VR)-based, and (3) hands-on experience (lifting a box using the BSE), where users virtually and physically completed various lifting/lowering tasks set at shoulder, waist, and ankle heights in symmetric and asymmetric positions. After every trial in each exposure, perceived usefulness was obtained. Overall, perceived usefulness ratings generally varied with major task variables (load, lift height, and trunk angle). The VR-based exposure appeared to clarify the specific circumstances under which the BSE was perceived to be useful and reduced extreme biases (positive or negative) that individuals may have developed prior to trying on a BSE.
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9630445
