More Like this

1. Universal Algorithms for Clustering

   Bruce Maggs, Arun Ganesh ( April 2021 , Leibniz international proceedings in informatics)

   Bansal, Nikhil and (Ed.)

   his paper presents universal algorithms for clustering problems, including the widely studied k-median, k-means, and k-center objectives. The input is a metric space containing all potential client locations. The algorithm must select k cluster centers such that they are a good solution for any subset of clients that actually realize. Specifically, we aim for low regret, defined as the maximum over all subsets of the difference between the cost of the algorithm’s solution and that of an optimal solution. A universal algorithm’s solution sol for a clustering problem is said to be an (α, β)-approximation if for all subsets of clients C', it satisfies sol(C') ≤ α ⋅ opt(C') + β ⋅ mr, where opt(C') is the cost of the optimal solution for clients C' and mr is the minimum regret achievable by any solution. Our main results are universal algorithms for the standard clustering objectives of k-median, k-means, and k-center that achieve (O(1), O(1))-approximations. These results are obtained via a novel framework for universal algorithms using linear programming (LP) relaxations. These results generalize to other 𝓁_p-objectives and the setting where some subset of the clients are fixed. We also give hardness results showing that (α, β)-approximation is NP-hard ifmore »α or β is at most a certain constant, even for the widely studied special case of Euclidean metric spaces. This shows that in some sense, (O(1), O(1))-approximation is the strongest type of guarantee obtainable for universal clustering.« less
2. The Information Bottleneck and Geometric Clustering

   https://doi.org/10.1162/neco_a_01136  

   Strouse, DJ ; Schwab, David J. ( March 2019 , Neural Computation)

   The information bottleneck (IB) approach to clustering takes a joint distribution [Formula: see text] and maps the data [Formula: see text] to cluster labels [Formula: see text], which retain maximal information about [Formula: see text] (Tishby, Pereira, & Bialek, 1999 ). This objective results in an algorithm that clusters data points based on the similarity of their conditional distributions [Formula: see text]. This is in contrast to classic geometric clustering algorithms such as [Formula: see text]-means and gaussian mixture models (GMMs), which take a set of observed data points [Formula: see text] and cluster them based on their geometric (typically Euclidean) distance from one another. Here, we show how to use the deterministic information bottleneck (DIB) (Strouse & Schwab, 2017 ), a variant of IB, to perform geometric clustering by choosing cluster labels that preserve information about data point location on a smoothed data set. We also introduce a novel intuitive method to choose the number of clusters via kinks in the information curve. We apply this approach to a variety of simple clustering problems, showing that DIB with our model selection procedure recovers the generative cluster labels. We also show that, in particular limits of our model parameters, clusteringmore »with DIB and IB is equivalent to [Formula: see text]-means and EM fitting of a GMM with hard and soft assignments, respectively. Thus, clustering with (D)IB generalizes and provides an information-theoretic perspective on these classic algorithms.« less
3. A Robust Spectral Clustering Algorithm for Sub-Gaussian Mixture Models with Outliers

   https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.2317  

   Srivastava, Prateek R. ; Sarkar, Purnamrita ; Hanasusanto, Grani A. ( January 2023 , Operations Research)

   We consider the problem of clustering data sets in the presence of arbitrary outliers. Traditional clustering algorithms such as k-means and spectral clustering are known to perform poorly for data sets contaminated with even a small number of outliers. In this paper, we develop a provably robust spectral clustering algorithm that applies a simple rounding scheme to denoise a Gaussian kernel matrix built from the data points and uses vanilla spectral clustering to recover the cluster labels of data points. We analyze the performance of our algorithm under the assumption that the “good” data points are generated from a mixture of sub-Gaussians (we term these “inliers”), whereas the outlier points can come from any arbitrary probability distribution. For this general class of models, we show that the misclassification error decays at an exponential rate in the signal-to-noise ratio, provided the number of outliers is a small fraction of the inlier points. Surprisingly, this derived error bound matches with the best-known bound for semidefinite programs (SDPs) under the same setting without outliers. We conduct extensive experiments on a variety of simulated and real-world data sets to demonstrate that our algorithm is less sensitive to outliers compared with other state-of-the-art algorithms proposedmore »in the literature. Funding: G. A. Hanasusanto was supported by the National Science Foundation Grants NSF ECCS-1752125 and NSF CCF-2153606. P. Sarkar gratefully acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation Grants NSF DMS-1713082, NSF HDR-1934932 and NSF 2019844. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.2317 .« less
4. Clustering with Faulty Centers

   Fox, Kyle ; Huang, Hongyao ; Raichel, Benjamin ( December 2022 , 33rd International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation)

   Bae, Sang Won ; Park, Heejin (Ed.)

   In this paper we introduce and formally study the problem of k-clustering with faulty centers. Specifically, we study the faulty versions of k-center, k-median, and k-means clustering, where centers have some probability of not existing, as opposed to prior work where clients had some probability of not existing. For all three problems we provide fixed parameter tractable algorithms, in the parameters k, d, and ε, that (1+ε)-approximate the minimum expected cost solutions for points in d dimensional Euclidean space. For Faulty k-center we additionally provide a 5-approximation for general metrics. Significantly, all of our algorithms have a small dependence on n. Specifically, our Faulty k-center algorithms have only linear dependence on n, while for our algorithms for Faulty k-median and Faulty k-means the dependence is still only n^(1 + o(1)).
5. A Fast Adaptive k-means with No Bounds

   https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2020.3008694  

   Xia, Shuyin ; Peng, Daowan ; Meng, Deyu ; Zhang, Changqing ; Wang, Guoyin ; Giem, Elisabeth ; Wei, Wei ; Chen, Zizhong ( January 2020 , IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence)

   This paper presents a novel accelerated exact k-means called as "Ball k-means" by using the ball to describe each cluster, which focus on reducing the point-centroid distance computation. It can exactly find its neighbor clusters for each cluster, resulting distance computations only between a point and its neighbor clusters' centroids instead of all centroids. What's more, each cluster can be divided into "stable area" and "active area", and the latter one is further divided into some exact "annular area". The assignment of the points in the "stable area" is not changed while the points in each "annular area" will be adjusted within a few neighbor clusters. There are no upper or lower bounds in the whole process. Moreover, ball k-means uses ball clusters and neighbor searching along with multiple novel stratagems for reducing centroid distance computations. In comparison with the current state-of-the art accelerated exact bounded methods, the Yinyang algorithm and the Exponion algorithm, as well as other top-of-the-line tree-based and bounded methods, the ball k-means attains both higher performance and performs fewer distance calculations, especially for large-k problems. The faster speed, no extra parameters and simpler design of "Ball k-means" make it an all-around replacement of the naive k-means.