An official website of the United States government
Machine learning-based inverse materials discovery has attracted enormous attention recently due to its flexibility in dealing with black box models. Yet, many metaheuristic algorithms are not as widely applied to materials discovery applications as machine learning methods. There are ongoing challenges in applying different optimization algorithms to discover materials with single- or multi-elemental compositions and how these algorithms differ in mining the ideal materials. We comprehensively compare 11 different optimization algorithms for the design of single- and multi-elemental crystals with targeted properties. By maximizing the bulk modulus and minimizing the Fermi energy through perturbing the parameterized elemental composition representations, we estimated the unique counts of elemental compositions, mean density scan of the objectives space, mean objectives, and frequency distributed over the materials’ representations and objectives. We found that nature-inspired algorithms contain more uncertainties in the defined elemental composition design tasks, which correspond to their dependency on multiple hyperparameters. Runge–Kutta optimization (RUN) exhibits higher mean objectives, whereas Bayesian optimization (BO) displayed low mean objectives compared with other methods. Combined with materials count and density scan, we propose that BO strives to approximate a more accurate surrogate of the design space by sampling more elemental compositions and hence have lower mean objectives, yet RUN will repeatedly sample the targeted elemental compositions with higher objective values. Our work sheds light on the automated digital design of materials with single- and multi-elemental compositions and is expected to elicit future studies on materials optimization, such as composite and alloy design based on specific desired properties.
more »
« less
Bayesian optimization with adaptive surrogate models for automated experimental design
Abstract Bayesian optimization (BO) is an indispensable tool to optimize objective functions that either do not have known functional forms or are expensive to evaluate. Currently, optimal experimental design is always conducted within the workflow of BO leading to more efficient exploration of the design space compared to traditional strategies. This can have a significant impact on modern scientific discovery, in particular autonomous materials discovery, which can be viewed as an optimization problem aimed at looking for the maximum (or minimum) point for the desired materials properties. The performance of BO-based experimental design depends not only on the adopted acquisition function but also on the surrogate models that help to approximate underlying objective functions. In this paper, we propose a fully autonomous experimental design framework that uses more adaptive and flexible Bayesian surrogate models in a BO procedure, namely Bayesian multivariate adaptive regression splines and Bayesian additive regression trees. They can overcome the weaknesses of widely used Gaussian process-based methods when faced with relatively high-dimensional design space or non-smooth patterns of objective functions. Both simulation studies and real-world materials science case studies demonstrate their enhanced search efficiency and robustness.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10360758
- Publisher / Repository:
- Nature Publishing Group
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- npj Computational Materials
- Volume:
- 7
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 2057-3960
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Optimizing a black-box function that is expensive to evaluate emerges in a gamut of machine learning and artifcial intelligence applications including drug discovery, policy optimization in robotics, and hyperparameter tuning of learning models to list a few. Bayesian optimization (BO) provides a principled framework to fnd the global optimum of such functions using a limited number of function evaluations. BO relies on a statistical surrogate model to actively select new query points, that is typically captured by a Gaussian process (GP). Unlike most existing approaches that hinge on a single GP surrogate model with a pre-selected kernel function that may confne the expressiveness of the sought function especially under the limited evaluation budget, the present work puts forth a weighted ensemble of GPs as a surrogate model. Building on the advocated Gaussian mixture (GM) posterior, the EGP framework adapts to the most ftted surrogate model as data arrive on-the-fy, offering a richer function space. For the acquisition of next evaluation points, the EGP-based posterior is coupled with an adaptive expected improvement (EI) criterion to balance exploration and exploitation of the search space. Numerical tests on a set of benchmark synthetic functions and two robotic tasks, demonstrate the impressive benefts of the proposed approach.more » « less
-
Abstract Data-driven design shows the promise of accelerating materials discovery but is challenging due to the prohibitive cost of searching the vast design space of chemistry, structure, and synthesis methods. Bayesian optimization (BO) employs uncertainty-aware machine learning models to select promising designs to evaluate, hence reducing the cost. However, BO with mixed numerical and categorical variables, which is of particular interest in materials design, has not been well studied. In this work, we survey frequentist and Bayesian approaches to uncertainty quantification of machine learning with mixed variables. We then conduct a systematic comparative study of their performances in BO using a popular representative model from each group, the random forest-based Lolo model (frequentist) and the latent variable Gaussian process model (Bayesian). We examine the efficacy of the two models in the optimization of mathematical functions, as well as properties of structural and functional materials, where we observe performance differences as related to problem dimensionality and complexity. By investigating the machine learning models’ predictive and uncertainty estimation capabilities, we provide interpretations of the observed performance differences. Our results provide practical guidance on choosing between frequentist and Bayesian uncertainty-aware machine learning models for mixed-variable BO in materials design.more » « less
-
Bayesian optimization (BO) has well-documented merits for optimizing black-box functions with an expensive evaluation cost. Such functions emerge in applications as diverse as hyperparameter tuning, drug discovery, and robotics. BO hinges on a Bayesian surrogate model to sequentially select query points so as to balance exploration with exploitation of the search space. Most existing works rely on a single Gaussian process (GP) based surrogate model, where the kernel function form is typically preselected using domain knowledge. To bypass such a design process, this paper leverages an ensemble (E) of GPs to adaptively select the surrogate model fit on-the-fly, yielding a GP mixture posterior with enhanced expressiveness for the sought function. Acquisition of the next evaluation input using this EGP-based function posterior is then enabled by Thompson sampling (TS) that requires no additional design parameters. To endow function sampling with scalability, random feature-based kernel approximation is leveraged per GP model. The novel EGP-TS readily accommodates parallel operation. To further establish convergence of the proposed EGP-TS to the global optimum, analysis is conducted based on the notion of Bayesian regret for both sequential and parallel settings. Tests on synthetic functions and real-world applications showcase the merits of the proposed method.more » « less
-
Current methods of finding optimal experimental conditions, Edisonian systematic searches, often inefficiently evaluate suboptimal design points and require fine resolution to identify near optimal conditions. For expensive experimental campaigns or those with large design spaces, the shortcomings of the status quo approaches are more significant. Here, we extend Bayesian optimization (BO) and introduce a chemically-informed data-driven optimization (ChIDDO) approach. This approach uses inexpensive and low-fidelity information obtained from physical models of chemical processes and subsequently combines it with expensive and high-fidelity experimental data to optimize a common objective function. Using common optimization benchmark objective functions, we describe scenarios in which the ChIDDO algorithm outperforms the traditional BO approach, and then implement the algorithm on a simulated electrochemical engineering optimization problem.more » « less
