More Like this

1. Lower Bounds Against Sparse Symmetric Functions of ACC Circuits: Expanding the Reach of #SAT Algorithms

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s00224-022-10106-8  

   Vyas, Nikhil ; Williams, R. Ryan ( November 2022 , Theory of Computing Systems)

   We continue the program of proving circuit lower bounds via circuit satisfiability algorithms. So far, this program has yielded several concrete results, proving that functions in$\mathsf {Quasi}\text {-}\mathsf {NP} = \mathsf {NTIME}[n^{(\log n)^{O(1)}}]$$\mathrm{Quasi}-\mathrm{NP}=\mathrm{NTIME}\left[n^{{\left(\log n\right)}^{O\left(1\right)}}\right]$and other complexity classes do not have small circuits (in the worst case and/or on average) from various circuit classes$\mathcal { C}$$C$, by showing that$\mathcal { C}$$C$admits non-trivial satisfiability and/or#SAT algorithms which beat exhaustive search by a minor amount. In this paper, we present a new strong lower bound consequence of having a non-trivial#SAT algorithm for a circuit class${\mathcal C}$$C$. Say that a symmetric Boolean functionf(x₁,…,x_n) issparseif it outputs 1 onO(1) values of${\sum }_{i} x_{i}$${\sum }_i{x}_i$. We show that for every sparsef, and for all “typical”$\mathcal { C}$$C$, faster#SAT algorithms for$\mathcal { C}$$C$circuits imply lower bounds against the circuit class$f \circ \mathcal { C}$$f\circ C$, which may bestrongerthan$\mathcal { C}$$C$itself. In particular:

   #SAT algorithms forn^k-size$\mathcal { C}$$C$-circuits running in 2ⁿ/n^ktime (for allk) implyNEXPdoes not have$(f \circ \mathcal { C})$$(f\circ C)$-circuits of polynomial size.

   #SAT algorithms for$2^{n^{{\varepsilon }}}$$2^{n^{\epsilon }}$-size$\mathcal { C}$$C$-circuits running in$2^{n-n^{{\varepsilon }}}$$2^{n-n^{\epsilon }}$time (for someε> 0) implyQuasi-NPdoes not have$(f \circ \mathcal { C})$$(f\circ C)$-circuits of polynomial size.

   Applying#SAT algorithms from the literature, one immediate corollary of our results is thatQuasi-NPdoes not haveEMAJ∘ACC⁰∘THRcircuits of polynomialmore »size, whereEMAJis the “exact majority” function, improving previous lower bounds againstACC⁰[Williams JACM’14] andACC⁰∘THR[Williams STOC’14], [Murray-Williams STOC’18]. This is the first nontrivial lower bound against such a circuit class.

   « less
2. The Brown measure of the free multiplicative Brownian motion

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-022-01142-z  

   Driver, Bruce K. ; Hall, Brian ; Kemp, Todd ( October 2022 , Probability Theory and Related Fields)

   The free multiplicative Brownian motion$$b_{t}$$$b_t$is the large-Nlimit of the Brownian motion on$$\mathsf {GL}(N;\mathbb {C}),$$$\mathrm{GL}(N;C),$in the sense of$$*$$$\ast$-distributions. The natural candidate for the large-Nlimit of the empirical distribution of eigenvalues is thus the Brown measure of$$b_{t}$$$b_t$. In previous work, the second and third authors showed that this Brown measure is supported in the closure of a region$$\Sigma _{t}$$${\Sigma }_t$that appeared in the work of Biane. In the present paper, we compute the Brown measure completely. It has a continuous density$$W_{t}$$$W_t$on$$\overline{\Sigma }_{t},$$${\overline{\Sigma }}_t,$which is strictly positive and real analytic on$$\Sigma _{t}$$${\Sigma }_t$. This density has a simple form in polar coordinates:$$\begin{aligned} W_{t}(r,\theta )=\frac{1}{r^{2}}w_{t}(\theta ), \end{aligned}$$$\begin{array}{c}{W}_t(r,\theta )=\frac{1}{r^2}{w}_t\left(\theta \right),\end{array}$where$$w_{t}$$$w_t$is an analytic function determined by the geometry of the region$$\Sigma _{t}$$${\Sigma }_t$. We show also that the spectral measure of free unitary Brownian motion$$u_{t}$$$u_t$is a “shadow” of the Brown measure of$$b_{t}$$$b_t$, precisely mirroring the relationship between the circular and semicircular laws. We develop several new methods, based on stochastic differential equations and PDE, to prove these results.
3. Semileptonic form factors for $$B\rightarrow D^*\ell \nu $$ at nonzero recoil from $$2+1$$-flavor lattice QCD: Fermilab Lattice and MILC Collaborations

   https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10984-9  

   Bazavov, A. ; DeTar, C. E. ; Du, D. ; El-Khadra, A. X. ; Gámiz, E. ; Gelzer, Z. ; Gottlieb, S. ; Heller, U. M. ; Kronfeld, A. S. ; Laiho, J. ; et al ( December 2022 , The European Physical Journal C)

   We present the first unquenched lattice-QCD calculation of the form factors for the decay$$B\rightarrow D^*\ell \nu $$$B\to D^{\ast }\ell \nu$at nonzero recoil. Our analysis includes 15 MILC ensembles with$$N_f=2+1$$$N_f=2+1$flavors of asqtad sea quarks, with a strange quark mass close to its physical mass. The lattice spacings range from$$a\approx 0.15$$$a\approx 0.15$fm down to 0.045 fm, while the ratio between the light- and the strange-quark masses ranges from 0.05 to 0.4. The valencebandcquarks are treated using the Wilson-clover action with the Fermilab interpretation, whereas the light sector employs asqtad staggered fermions. We extrapolate our results to the physical point in the continuum limit using rooted staggered heavy-light meson chiral perturbation theory. Then we apply a model-independent parametrization to extend the form factors to the full kinematic range. With this parametrization we perform a joint lattice-QCD/experiment fit using several experimental datasets to determine the CKM matrix element$$|V_{cb}|$$$|V_{\mathrm{cb}}|$. We obtain$$\left| V_{cb}\right| = (38.40 \pm 0.68_{\text {th}} \pm 0.34_{\text {exp}} \pm 0.18_{\text {EM}})\times 10^{-3}$$$\left(V_{\mathrm{cb}}\right)=(38.40\pm 0.{68}_{\text{th}}\pm 0.{34}_{\text{exp}}\pm 0.{18}_{\text{EM}})\times {10}^{-3}$. The first error is theoretical, the second comes from experiment and the last one includes electromagnetic and electroweak uncertainties, with an overall$$\chi ^2\text {/dof} = 126/84$$${\chi }^2\text{/dof}=126/84$, which illustrates the tensions between the experimental data sets, and between theory and experiment. This result is inmore »agreement with previous exclusive determinations, but the tension with the inclusive determination remains. Finally, we integrate the differential decay rate obtained solely from lattice data to predict$$R(D^*) = 0.265 \pm 0.013$$$R\left(D^{\ast }\right)=0.265\pm 0.013$, which confirms the current tension between theory and experiment.

   « less
4. Finding solutions with distinct variables to systems of linear equations over $$\mathbb {F}_p$$

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-022-02391-y  

   Sauermann, Lisa ( April 2022 , Mathematische Annalen)

   Let us fix a primepand a homogeneous system ofmlinear equations$$a_{j,1}x_1+\dots +a_{j,k}x_k=0$$$a_{j,1}{x}_1+\cdots +a_{j,k}{x}_k=0$for$$j=1,\dots ,m$$$j=1,\cdots ,m$with coefficients$$a_{j,i}\in \mathbb {F}_p$$$a_{j,i}\in F_p$. Suppose that$$k\ge 3m$$$k\ge 3m$, that$$a_{j,1}+\dots +a_{j,k}=0$$$a_{j,1}+\cdots +a_{j,k}=0$for$$j=1,\dots ,m$$$j=1,\cdots ,m$and that every$$m\times m$$$m\times m$minor of the$$m\times k$$$m\times k$matrix$$(a_{j,i})_{j,i}$$${\left(a_{j,i}\right)}_{j,i}$is non-singular. Then we prove that for any (large)n, any subset$$A\subseteq \mathbb {F}_p^n$$$A\subseteq F_p^n$of size$$|A|> C\cdot \Gamma ^n$$$\left|A\right|>C·{\Gamma }^n$contains a solution$$(x_1,\dots ,x_k)\in A^k$$$(x_1,\cdots ,x_k)\in A^k$to the given system of equations such that the vectors$$x_1,\dots ,x_k\in A$$$x_1,\cdots ,x_k\in A$are all distinct. Here,Cand$$\Gamma $$$\Gamma$are constants only depending onp,mandksuch that$$\Gamma $\Gamma <p$. The crucial point here is the condition for the vectors$$x_1,\dots ,x_k$$$x_1,\cdots ,x_k$in the solution$$(x_1,\dots ,x_k)\in A^k$$$(x_1,\cdots ,x_k)\in A^k$to be distinct. If we relax this condition and only demand that$$x_1,\dots ,x_k$$$x_1,\cdots ,x_k$are not all equal, then the statement would follow easily from Tao’s slice rank polynomial method. However, handling the distinctness condition is much harder, and requires a new approach. While all previous combinatorial applications of the slice rank polynomial method have relied on the slice rank of diagonal tensors, we use a slice rank argument for a non-diagonal tensor in combination with combinatorial and probabilistic arguments.
5. Green function estimates on complements of low-dimensional uniformly rectifiable sets

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-022-02379-8  

   David, Guy ; Feneuil, Joseph ; Mayboroda, Svitlana ( March 2022 , Mathematische Annalen)

   It has been recently established in David and Mayboroda (Approximation of green functions and domains with uniformly rectifiable boundaries of all dimensions.arXiv:2010.09793) that on uniformly rectifiable sets the Green function is almost affine in the weak sense, and moreover, in some scenarios such Green function estimates are equivalent to the uniform rectifiability of a set. The present paper tackles a strong analogue of these results, starting with the “flagship degenerate operators on sets with lower dimensional boundaries. We consider the elliptic operators$$L_{\beta ,\gamma } =- {\text {div}}D^{d+1+\gamma -n} \nabla $$$L_{\beta ,\gamma }=-\text{div}{D}^{d+1+\gamma -n}\nabla$associated to a domain$$\Omega \subset {\mathbb {R}}^n$$$\Omega \subset R^n$with a uniformly rectifiable boundary$$\Gamma $$$\Gamma$of dimension$$d < n-1$$$d<n-1$, the now usual distance to the boundary$$D = D_\beta $$$D=D_{\beta }$given by$$D_\beta (X)^{-\beta } = \int _{\Gamma } |X-y|^{-d-\beta } d\sigma (y)$$$D_{\beta }{\left(X\right)}^{-\beta }={\int }_{\Gamma }{|X-y|}^{-d-\beta }d\sigma \left(y\right)$for$$X \in \Omega $$$X\in \Omega$, where$$\beta >0$$$\beta >0$and$$\gamma \in (-1,1)$$$\gamma \in (-1,1)$. In this paper we show that the Green functionGfor$$L_{\beta ,\gamma }$$$L_{\beta ,\gamma }$, with pole at infinity, is well approximated by multiples of$$D^{1-\gamma }$$$D^{1-\gamma }$, in the sense that the function$$\big | D\nabla \big (\ln \big ( \frac{G}{D^{1-\gamma }} \big )\big )\big |^2$$$|D\nabla (ln(\frac{G}{D^{1-\gamma }})){|}^2$satisfies a Carleson measure estimate on$$\Omega $$$\Omega$. We underline that the strong and the weak results are different in nature and, of course, at the levelmore »of the proofs: the latter extensively used compactness arguments, while the present paper relies on some intricate integration by parts and the properties of the “magical distance function from David et al. (Duke Math J, to appear).

   « less