An official website of the United States government
Restless multi-armed bandits (RMAB) have been widely used to model sequential decision making problems with constraints. The decision maker (DM) aims to maximize the expected total reward over an infinite horizon under an “instantaneous activation constraint” that at most B arms can be activated at any decision epoch, where the state of each arm evolves stochastically according to a Markov decision process (MDP). However, this basic model fails to provide any fairness guarantee among arms. In this paper, we introduce RMAB-F, a new RMAB model with “long-term fairness constraints”, where the objective now is to maximize the longterm reward while a minimum long-term activation fraction for each arm must be satisfied. For the online RMAB-F setting (i.e., the underlying MDPs associated with each arm are unknown to the DM), we develop a novel reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm named Fair-UCRL. We prove that Fair-UCRL ensures probabilistic sublinear bounds on both the reward regret and the fairness violation regret. Compared with off-the-shelf RL methods, our Fair-UCRL is much more computationally efficient since it contains a novel exploitation that leverages a low-complexity index policy for making decisions. Experimental results further demonstrate the effectiveness of our Fair-UCRL.
more »
« less
Group Fairness in Bandits with Biased Feedback
We propose a novel formulation of group fairness with biased feedback in the contextual multi-armed bandit (CMAB) setting. In the CMAB setting, a sequential decision maker must, at each time step, choose an arm to pull from a finite set of arms after observing some context for each of the potential arm pulls. In our model, arms are partitioned into two or more sensitive groups based on some protected feature(s) (e.g., age, race, or socio-economic status). Initial rewards received from pulling an arm may be distorted due to some unknown societal or measurement bias. We assume that in reality these groups are equal despite the biased feedback received by the agent. To alleviate this, we learn a societal bias term which can be used to both find the source of bias and to potentially fix the problem outside of the algorithm. We provide a novel algorithm that can accommodate this notion of fairness for an arbitrary number of groups, and provide a theoretical bound on the regret for our algorithm. We validate our algorithm using synthetic data and two real-world datasets for intervention settings wherein we want to allocate resources fairly across groups.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2007955
- PAR ID:
- 10386118
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2022
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1155-1163
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
We develop a novel and generic algorithm for the adversarial multi-armed bandit problem (or more generally the combinatorial semi-bandit problem). When instantiated differently, our algorithm achieves various new data-dependent regret bounds improving previous work. Examples include: 1) a regret bound depending on the variance of only the best arm; 2) a regret bound depending on the first-order path-length of only the best arm; 3) a regret bound depending on the sum of the first-order path-lengths of all arms as well as an important negative term, which together lead to faster convergence rates for some normal form games with partial feedback; 4) a regret bound that simultaneously implies small regret when the best arm has small loss {\it and} logarithmic regret when there exists an arm whose expected loss is always smaller than those of other arms by a fixed gap (e.g. the classic i.i.d. setting). In some cases, such as the last two results, our algorithm is completely parameter-free. The main idea of our algorithm is to apply the optimism and adaptivity techniques to the well-known Online Mirror Descent framework with a special log-barrier regularizer. The challenges are to come up with appropriate optimistic predictions and correction terms in this framework. Some of our results also crucially rely on using a sophisticated increasing learning rate schedule.more » « less
-
We consider the bandit problem of selecting K out of N arms at each time step. The joint reward can be a non-linear function of the rewards of the selected individual arms. The direct use of a multi-armed bandit algorithm requires choosing among all possible combinations, making the action space large. To simplify the problem, existing works on combinatorial bandits typically assume feedback as a linear function of individual rewards. In this paper, we prove the lower bound for top-K subset selection with bandit feedback with possibly correlated rewards. We present a novel algorithm for the combinatorial setting without using individual arm feedback or requiring linearity of the reward function. Additionally, our algorithm works on correlated rewards of individual arms. Our algorithm, aDaptive Accept RejecT (DART), sequentially finds good arms and eliminates bad arms based on confidence bounds. DART is computationally efficient and uses storage linear in N. Further, DART achieves a regret bound of Õ(K√KNT) for a time horizon T, which matches the lower bound in bandit feedback up to a factor of √log 2NT. When applied to the problem of cross-selling optimization and maximizing the mean of individual rewards, the performance of the proposed algorithm surpasses that of state-of-the-art algorithms. We also show that DART significantly outperforms existing methods for both linear and non-linear joint reward environments.more » « less
-
Rated preference aggregation is conventionally performed by averaging ratings from multiple evaluators to create a consensus ordering of candidates from highest to lowest average rating. Ideally, the consensus is fair, meaning critical opportunities are not withheld from marginalized groups of candidates, even if group biases may be present in the to-be-combined ratings. Prior work operationalizing fairness in preference aggregation is limited to settings where evaluators provide rankings of candidates (e.g., Joe > Jack > Jill). Yet, in practice, many evaluators assign ratings such as Likert scales or categories (e.g., yes, no, maybe) to each candidate. Ratings convey different information than rankings leading to distinct fairness issues during their aggregation. The existing literature does not characterize these fairness concerns nor provide applicable bias-mitigation solutions. Unlike the ranked setting studied previously, two unique forms of bias arise in rating aggregation. First, biased rating stems from group disparities in to-be-aggregated evaluator ratings. Second, biased tie-breaking occurs because ties in average ratings must be resolved when aggregating ratings into a consensus ranking, and this tie-breaking act can unfairly advantage certain groups. To address this gap, we define the open fair rated preference aggregation problem and introduce the corresponding Fate methodology. Fate offers the first group fairness metric specifically for rated preference data. We propose two Fate algorithms. Fate-Break works in settings when ties need to be broken, explicitly fairness-enhancing such processes without lowering consensus utility. Fate-Rate mitigates disparities in how groups are rated, by using a Markov-chain approach to generate outcomes where groups are, in as much as possible, equally represented. Our experimental study illustrates the FATE methods provide the most bias-mitigation compared to adapting prior methods to fair tie-breaking and rating aggregation.more » « less
-
Although many fairness criteria have been proposed to ensure that machine learning algorithms do not exhibit or amplify our existing social biases, these algorithms are trained on datasets that can themselves be statistically biased. In this paper, we investigate the robustness of existing (demographic) fairness criteria when the algorithm is trained on biased data. We consider two forms of dataset bias: errors by prior decision makers in the labeling process, and errors in the measurement of the features of disadvantaged individuals. We analytically show that some constraints (such as Demographic Parity) can remain robust when facing certain statistical biases, while others (such as Equalized Odds) are significantly violated if trained on biased data. We provide numerical experiments based on three real-world datasets (the FICO, Adult, and German credit score datasets) supporting our analytical findings. While fairness criteria are primarily chosen under normative considerations in practice, our results show that naively applying a fairness constraint can lead to not only a loss in utility for the decision maker, but more severe unfairness when data bias exists. Thus, understanding how fairness criteria react to different forms of data bias presents a critical guideline for choosing among existing fairness criteria, or for proposing new criteria, when available datasets may be biased.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- The DOI is not currently available.
