An official website of the United States government
Achieving fairness in sequential decision making systems within Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) environments is a critical concern, especially when multiple humans with different behavior and expectations are affected by the same adaptation decisions in the system. This human variability factor adds more complexity since policies deemed fair at one point in time may become discriminatory over time due to variations in human preferences resulting from inter- and intra-human variability. This paper addresses the fairness problem from an equity lens, considering human behavior variability, and the changes in human preferences over time. We propose FAIRO, a novel algorithm for fairness-aware sequential decision making in HITL adaptation, which incorporates these notions into the decision-making process. In particular, FAIRO decomposes this complex fairness task into adaptive sub-tasks based on individual human preferences through leveraging the Options reinforcement learning framework. We design FAIRO to generalize to three types of HITL application setups that have the shared adaptation decision problem. Furthermore, we recognize that fairness-aware policies can sometimes conflict with the application’s utility. To address this challenge, we provide a fairness-utility tradeoff in FAIRO, allowing system designers to balance the objectives of fairness and utility based on specific application requirements. Extensive evaluations of FAIRO on the three HITL applications demonstrate its generalizability and effectiveness in promoting fairness while accounting for human variability. On average, FAIRO can improve fairness compared with other methods across all three applications by 35.36%.
more »
« less
Models and mechanisms for spatial data fairness
Fairness in data-driven decision-making studies scenarios where individuals from certain population segments may be unfairly treated when being considered for loan or job applications, access to public resources, or other types of services. In location-based applications, decisions are based on individual whereabouts, which often correlate with sensitive attributes such as race, income, and education. While fairness has received significant attention recently, e.g., in machine learning, there is little focus on achieving fairness when dealing with location data. Due to their characteristics and specific type of processing algorithms, location data pose important fairness challenges. We introduce the concept of spatial data fairness to address the specific challenges of location data and spatial queries. We devise a novel building block to achieve fairness in the form of fair polynomials. Next, we propose two mechanisms based on fair polynomials that achieve individual spatial fairness, corresponding to two common location-based decision-making types: distance-based and zone-based. Extensive experimental results on real data show that the proposed mechanisms achieve spatial fairness without sacrificing utility.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10431989
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
- Volume:
- 16
- Issue:
- 2
- ISSN:
- 2150-8097
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 167 to 179
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across various domains. Despite the successes of GNN deployment, their utilization often reflects societal biases, which critically hinder their adoption in high-stake decision-making scenarios such as online clinical diagnosis, financial crediting, etc. Numerous efforts have been made to develop fair GNNs but they typically concentrate on either individual or group fairness, overlooking the intricate interplay between the two, resulting in the enhancement of one, usually at the cost of the other. In addition, existing individual fairness approaches using a ranking perspective fail to identify discrimination in the ranking. This paper introduces two innovative notions dealing with individual graph fairness and group-aware individual graph fairness, aiming to more accurately measure individual and group biases. Our Group Equality Individual Fairness (GEIF) framework is designed to achieve individual fairness while equalizing the level of individual fairness among subgroups. Preliminary experiments on several real-world graph datasets demonstrate that GEIF outperforms state-of-the-art methods by a significant margin in terms of individual fairness, group fairness, and utility performance.more » « less
-
A key goal of the fair-ML community is to develop machine-learning based systems that, once introduced into a social context, can achieve social and legal outcomes such as fairness, justice, and due process. Bedrock concepts in computer science---such as abstraction and modular design---are used to define notions of fairness and discrimination, to produce fairness-aware learning algorithms, and to intervene at different stages of a decision-making pipeline to produce "fair" outcomes. In this paper, however, we contend that these concepts render technical interventions ineffective, inaccurate, and sometimes dangerously misguided when they enter the societal context that surrounds decision-making systems. We outline this mismatch with five "traps" that fair-ML work can fall into even as it attempts to be more context-aware in comparison to traditional data science. We draw on studies of sociotechnical systems in Science and Technology Studies to explain why such traps occur and how to avoid them. Finally, we suggest ways in which technical designers can mitigate the traps through a refocusing of design in terms of process rather than solutions, and by drawing abstraction boundaries to include social actors rather than purely technical ones.more » « less
-
The operationalization of algorithmic fairness comes with several practical challenges, not the least of which is the availability or reliability of protected attributes in datasets. In real-world contexts, practical and legal impediments may prevent the collection and use of demographic data, making it difficult to ensure algorithmic fairness. While initial fairness algorithms did not consider these limitations, recent proposals aim to achieve algorithmic fairness in classification by incorporating noisiness in protected attributes or not using protected attributes at all. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first head-to-head study of fair classification algorithms to compare attribute-reliant, noise-tolerant and attribute-unaware algorithms along the dual axes of predictivity and fairness. We evaluated these algorithms via case studies on four real-world datasets and synthetic perturbations. Our study reveals that attribute-unaware and noise-tolerant fair classifiers can potentially achieve similar level of performance as attribute-reliant algorithms, even when protected attributes are noisy. However, implementing them in practice requires careful nuance. Our study provides insights into the practical implications of using fair classification algorithms in scenarios where protected attributes are noisy or partially available.more » « less
-
The rise of machine learning-driven decision-making has sparked a growing emphasis on algorithmic fairness. Within the realm of clustering, the notion of balance is utilized as a criterion for attaining fairness, which characterizes a clustering mechanism as fair when the resulting clusters maintain a consistent proportion of observations representing individuals from distinct groups delineated by protected attributes. Building on this idea, the literature has rapidly incorporated a myriad of extensions, devising fair versions of the existing frequentist clustering algorithms, e.g., k-means, k-medioids, etc., that aim at minimizing specific loss functions. These approaches lack uncertainty quantification associated with the optimal clustering configuration and only provide clustering boundaries without quantifying the probabilities associated with each observation belonging to the different clusters. In this article, we intend to offer a novel probabilistic formulation of the fair clustering problem that facilitates valid uncertainty quantification even under mild model misspecifications, without incurring substantial computational overhead. Mixture model-based fair clustering frameworks facilitate automatic uncertainty quantification, but tend to showcase brittleness under model misspecification and involve significant computational challenges. To circumnavigate such issues, we propose a generalized Bayesian fair clustering framework that inherently enjoys decision-theoretic interpretation. Moreover, we devise efficient computational algorithms that crucially leverage techniques from the existing literature on optimal transport and clustering based on loss functions. The gain from the proposed technology is showcased via numerical experiments and real data examples.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.14778/3565816.3565820
