We present here Bedmap3, the latest suite of gridded products describing surface elevation, ice-thickness and the seafloor and subglacial bed elevation of Antarctica south of 60degS. Bedmap3 incorporates and adds to all post-1950s datasets previously used for Bedmap1 and Bedmap2, including 84 new aero-geophysical surveys by 15 data providers, an additional 52 million data points and 1.9 million line-kilometres of measurement. This has filled notable gaps in East Antarctica, including the South Pole and Pensacola basin, Dronning Maud Land, Recovery Glacier and Dome Fuji, Princess Elizabeth Land, plus the Antarctic Peninsula, West Antarctic coastlines, and the Transantarctic Mountains. Our new Bedmap3/RINGS grounding line similarly consolidates multiple recent mappings into a single, spatially coherent feature. Combined with updated maps of surface topography, ice shelf thickness, rock outcrops and bathymetry, Bedmap3 reveals in much greater detail the subglacial landscape and distribution of Antarctica's ice, providing new opportunities to interpret continental-scale landscape evolution and to model in detail the past and future evolution of the Antarctic ice sheets. Sponsored by the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR), the Bedmap3 Action group aims to produce a new map and datasets of Antarctic ice thickness and bed topography for the international scientific community. The associated Bedmap datasets are listed here: https://www.bas.ac.uk/project/bedmap/#data
more »
« less
Antarctic Bedmap data: Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) sharing of 60 years of ice bed, surface, and thickness data
Abstract. One of the key components of this research has been the mapping of Antarctic bed topography and ice thickness parameters that are crucial for modelling ice flow and hence for predicting future ice loss andthe ensuing sea level rise. Supported by the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR), the Bedmap3 Action Group aims not only to produce newgridded maps of ice thickness and bed topography for the internationalscientific community, but also to standardize and make available all thegeophysical survey data points used in producing the Bedmap griddedproducts. Here, we document the survey data used in the latest iteration,Bedmap3, incorporating and adding to all of the datasets previously used forBedmap1 and Bedmap2, including ice bed, surface and thickness point data from all Antarctic geophysical campaigns since the 1950s. More specifically,we describe the processes used to standardize and make these and futuresurveys and gridded datasets accessible under the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) data principles. With the goals of making the gridding process reproducible and allowing scientists to re-use the data freely for their own analysis, we introduce the new SCAR Bedmap Data Portal(https://bedmap.scar.org, last access: 1 March 2023) created to provideunprecedented open access to these important datasets through a web-map interface. We believe that this data release will be a valuable asset to Antarctic research and will greatly extend the life cycle of the data heldwithin it. Data are available from the UK Polar Data Centre: https://data.bas.ac.uk (last access: 5 May 2023). See the Data availability section for the complete list of datasets.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10435747
- Author(s) / Creator(s):
- ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; more »
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Earth System Science Data
- Volume:
- 15
- Issue:
- 7
- ISSN:
- 1866-3516
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 2695 to 2710
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
<p>NSF COLDEX performed two airborne campaigns from South Pole Station over the Southern Flank of Dome A and 2022-23 and 2023-24, searching for a potential site of a continuous ice core that could sample the mid-Pleistocene transition. Ice thickness data extracted from the MARFA radar system has allow for a new understanding of this region.</p> <p>Here we generate crustal scale maps of ice thickness, bed elevation, specularity content, subglacial RMS deviation and fractional basal ice thickness with 1 km sampling, and 10 km resolution. We include both masked and unmasked grids.</p> <p> The projection is in the SCAR standard ESPG:3031 polar stereographic projection with true scale at 71˚S.</p> <p>These geotiffs were generated using performed using GMT6.5 (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008515">Wessel et al., 2019</a>) using the pygmt interface, by binning the raw data to 2.5 km cells, and using the <a href="https://github.com/sakov/nn-c"> nnbathy </a> program to apply natural neighbor interpolation to 1 km sampling. A 10 km Gaussian filter - representing typical lines spacings - was applied and then a mask was applied for all locations where the nearest data point was further than 8 km. </p> Ice thickness, bed elevation and RMS deviation @ 400 m length scale (<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000JE001429">roughness</a>) data includes the following datasets: <ul> <li> UTIG/CRESIS <a href="https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/J38CO5">NSF COLDEX Airborne MARFA data</a></li> <li> British Antarctic Survey <a href="https://doi.org/10.5285/0f6f5a45-d8af-4511-a264-b0b35ee34af6">AGAP-North</a></li> <li> LDEO <a href="https://doi.org/10.1594/IEDA/317765"> AGAP-South </a></li> <li> British Antarctic Survey <a href="https://doi.org/10.5270/esa-8ffoo3e">Polargap</a></li> <li> UTIG Support Office for Airborne Research <a href="https://doi.org/10.15784/601588">Pensacola-Pole Transect (PPT) </a></li> <li> NASA/CReSIS <a href="https://doi.org/10.5067/GDQ0CUCVTE2Q"> 2016 and 2018 Operation Ice Bridge </a> </li> <li> ICECAP/PRIC <a href="https://doi.org/10.15784/601437"> SPICECAP Titan Dome Survey </a> </ul> <p>Specularity content (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2014.2337878">Schroeder et al. 2014</a>) is compiled from <a href="https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/KHUT1U"> Young et al. 2025a </a> and <a href="https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/6T5JS6"> Young et al. 2025b</a>.</p> <p>Basal ice fractional thickness is complied from manual interpretation by Vega Gonzàlez, Yan and Singh. </p> <p>Code to generated these grids can be found at <a href="https://github.com/smudog/COLDEX_dichotomy_paper_2025"> at github.com </a></p>more » « less
-
Abstract We present Bedmap3, the latest suite of gridded products describing surface elevation, ice-thickness and the seafloor and subglacial bed elevation of the Antarctic south of 60 °S. Bedmap3 incorporates and adds to all post-1950s datasets previously used for Bedmap2, including 84 new aero-geophysical surveys by 15 data providers, an additional 52 million data points and 1.9 million line-kilometres of measurement. These efforts have filled notable gaps including in major mountain ranges and the deep interior of East Antarctica, along West Antarctic coastlines and on the Antarctic Peninsula. Our new Bedmap3/RINGS grounding line similarly consolidates multiple recent mappings into a single, spatially coherent feature. Combined with updated maps of surface topography, ice shelf thickness, rock outcrops and bathymetry, Bedmap3 reveals in much greater detail the subglacial landscape and distribution of Antarctica’s ice, providing new opportunities to interpret continental-scale landscape evolution and to model the past and future evolution of the Antarctic ice sheets.more » « less
-
Hercules Dome, Antarctica, has long been identified as a prospective deep ice core site due to the undisturbed internal layering, climatic setting and potential to obtain proxy records from the Last Interglacial (LIG) period when the West Antarctic ice sheet may have collapsed. We performed a geophysical survey using multiple ice-penetrating radar systems to identify potential locations for a deep ice core at Hercules Dome. The surface topography, as revealed with recent satellite observations, is more complex than previously recognized. The most prominent dome, which we term ‘West Dome’, is the most promising region for a deep ice core for the following reasons: (1) bed-conformal radar reflections indicate minimal layer disturbance and extend to within tens of meters of the ice bottom; (2) the bed is likely frozen, as evidenced by both the shape of the measured vertical ice velocity profiles beneath the divide and modeled ice temperature using three remotely sensed estimates of geothermal flux and (3) models of layer thinning have 132 ka old ice at 45–90 m above the bed with an annual layer thickness of ~1 mm, satisfying the resolution and preservation needed for detailed analysis of the LIG period.more » « less
-
{"Abstract":["This classified_bed data product represents the radar bed classification shown in <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0297">Young et al., 2016</a>. Values of 0 represent specularity content below 20%; values of 3.3 represent specularity content above 20% and energy 1 microsecond below the bed 15 dB lower than the bed echo, and values of 6.7 represent specularity content above 20% and energy 1 microsecond below the bed 15 dB within than the bed echo. Grids for specularity content and post bed echo are also available. Data is available as COARDS-compliant netCDF-4/HDF5 grids (.grd) and GeoTiffs (.tiff), both in EPSG 3031 (Antarctic Polar Stereographic) projection.\n<p>\n<p>\nData were gridded using <a href="https://docs.generic-mapping-tools.org/6.1/gmt.html"> GMT6.1</a> and the <a href="https://github.com/sakov/nn-c">nnbathy</a> natural neighbor interpolator. Cell size was 1 km, gaussian filter distance was 5 km, and mask radius was 2 km.\n<p>\nBrowse images, with Bedmap3 (Pritchard et al., 2025) surface elevation contours and MEASURES phase derived surface velocities (Mouginot et al. 2019) are available for each dataset.\n\n<p>\n<p>\nAn interpretation of the values in the classified_bed product is that low values are rough bed, intermediate values are isotropic wet bed, and high values are anisotropic wet bed.\n\nVersion 1 includes data from the 2016 paper, including AGASEA over Thwaites Glacier (Holt et al., 2006), ATRS over West Antarctica (Peters et al., 2005), GIMBLE over Marie Byrd Land (Young et al, 2013) and parts of ICECAP over Wilkes Subglacial Basin, Dome C, Highland B and Totten Glacier. (Young et al, 2011, Young et al., 2016). We expect updates to the coverage as part of work funded by the Arête Glaciers Initiative.\n\n<p>\n<b>References</b>\n<br>\nHolt, J. W., Blankenship, D. D., Morse, D. L., Young, D. A., Peters, M. E., Kempf, S. D., Richter, T. G., Vaughan, D. G., and Corr, H., New boundary conditions for the West Antarctic ice sheet: subglacial topography of the Thwaites and Smith Glacier catchments, 2006, Geophysical Research Letters, 33 (L09502), pp., https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025561\n<br>\nMouginot, J., Rignot, E., and Scheuchl, B., Continent-wide, interferometric SAR phase, mapping of Antarctic ice velocity, 2019, Geophysical Research Letters, 46(16), pp.9710-9718, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083826\n<br>\nPeters, M. E., Blankenship, D. D., and Morse, D. L., Analysis techniques for coherent airborne radar sounding: Application to West Antarctic ice streams, 2005 ,Journal of Geophysical Research, 110(B06303), pp.,https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JB003222\n<br>\nPritchard, H. D., and others.,Bedmap3 updated ice bed, surface and thickness gridded datasets for Antarctica,2025,Scientific Data,12(1), pp.414,https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-04672-y\n<br>\nYoung, D. A., D. D. Blankenship, J. S. Greenbaum, E. Quartini, G. L. Muldoon, F. Habbal, L. E. Lindzey, C. A. Greene, E. M. Powell, G. C. Ng, T. G. Richter, G. Echeverry, and S. Kempf, 2024, Geophysical Investigations of Marie Byrd Land Lithospheric Evolution (GIMBLE) Airborne VHF Radar Transects: 2012/2013 and 2014/2015, https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/BMXUHX, Texas Data Repository\n<br>\nYoung, D. A., Wright, A. P., Roberts, J. L., Warner, R. C., Young, N. W., Greenbaum, J. S., Schroeder, D. M., Holt, J. W., Sugden, D. E., Blankenship, D. D., van Ommen, T. D., and Siegert, M. J.,A dynamic early East Antarctic Ice Sheet suggested by ice covered fjord landscapes, 2011, Nature, 474, pp.72-75, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10114\n<br>\nYoung, D. A., Schroeder, D. M., Blankenship, D. D., Kempf, S. D., and Quartini, E.,The distribution of basal water between Antarctic subglacial lakes from radar sounding,2016,Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 374 (20140297), pp.1-21, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0297\n\n<p>\n<b>Change Log</b>\n<br>\nChanges from V1: changes to gridding parameters to more closely match the figures from Young 2016; updated metadata gridding description"]}more » « less
An official website of the United States government

