An official website of the United States government
Advancements in genetic technology and processing allows for the presence of loose genetic material in the environment to become a resource, capable of assisting habitat and wildlife management efforts by providing information about organisms in a region without having to disturb or disrupt the organisms and environment. This use of environmental DNA has gained traction across biomes, with researchers continuing to test extraction and processing of DNA from various environmental media. However, the high variability in media quality, characteristics, and taxonomic knowledge means that the tested capabilities of eDNA vary wildly depending on the application and species of interest. In this thesis, I focus on the use of eDNA metabarcoding in freshwater streams in Maine, examining the ability and existing libraries of two genetic loci to identify Maine fish and macroinvertebrate species. eDNA results are compared against a traditional specimen-based surveying method utilized by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection and the Penobscot Nation’s Department of Natural Resources, and over time to monitor the success of stream restoration initiatives. While eDNA samples successfully detected fish and invertebrate species in both datasets, no strong correlation was found between benthic macroinvertebrate abundance counts and detected sequence variants. Furthermore, eDNA detection led to highly different community survey results than the specimen-based survey method, and limitations of available reference sequences indicate a strong need for localized references for future eDNA work. While eDNA was able to identify ASVs at a higher clarity than the specimen-based survey method, only 4 taxonomic families were shared between the survey method categorization and eDNA detection. However, eDNA was successful when applied to a broader range of taxa for presence-absence detection and community composition detection, and found that stream communities did change significantly based on installment of large wood addition projects.
more »
« less
Assessing stream channel restoration: the phased recovery framework
Channel reconfiguration is one of the most common and costly stream restoration techniques, though its effectiveness is frequently questioned. Project monitoring often tracks changes in macroinvertebrate communities and other responses for a 5‐year period. However, channel reconfiguration is a documented disturbance to stream ecosystems, suggesting that this form of restoration initiates succession over longer time frames than monitoring typically captures. To address the role of succession in stream ecosystem recovery, we developed the Phased Recovery Framework (PRF) which proposes benchmarks represented by predictable habitat structure and community composition based on project age. The PRF was tested across nine stream restoration projects in western Montana, ranging in age from 1 to 18 years, each paired with an established reference system. We tested for differences in channel form, habitat character, and macroinvertebrate community composition. While restoration established desired channel form, most biotic variables had not recovered to reference condition even for the oldest projects. Across all sites, phases of the PRF were poor predictors of response. However, analyzing responses to reconfiguration independently for sites in watersheds with unimpaired water quality versus those experiencing excessive nutrient enrichment (i.e. impaired sites) indicated that biological variables converged on reference conditions at unimpaired sites, but diverged across impaired reaches. These large‐scale anthropogenic influences may play a stronger role in recovery than do changes to channel form and need to be incorporated into project design and success criteria. Assessment of the PRF suggests that short‐term monitoring is not likely to produce reliable indicators of effectiveness without incorporating locally appropriate change associated with watershed impairment and successional progression.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1757351
- PAR ID:
- 10460835
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley-Blackwell
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Restoration Ecology
- Volume:
- 27
- Issue:
- 4
- ISSN:
- 1061-2971
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- p. 850-861
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Beaver dam analogs (BDAs) are a stream restoration technique that is rapidly gaining popularity in the western United States. These low‐cost, stream‐spanning structures, designed after natural beaver dams, are being installed to confer the ecologic, hydrologic, and geomorphic benefits of beaver dams in streams that are often too degraded to provide suitable beaver habitat. BDAs are intended to slow streamflow, reduce the erosive power of the stream, and promote aggradation, making them attractive restoration tools in incised channels. Despite increasing adoption of BDAs, few studies to date have monitored the impacts of BDAs on channel form. Here, we examine the geomorphic changes that occurred within the first year of restoration efforts in Wyoming using high‐resolution visible light orthomosaics and elevation data collected with unoccupied aerial vehicles (UAVs). By leveraging the advantages of rapidly acquired images from UAV surveys with recent advancements in structure‐from‐motion photogrammetry, we constructed centimeter‐scale digital elevation models (DEMs) of the restoration reach and an upstream control reach. Through DEM differencing, we identified areas of enhanced erosion and deposition near the BDAs, suggesting BDA installation initiated a unique geomorphic response in the channel. Both reaches were characterized by net erosion during the first year of restoration efforts. While erosion around the BDAs may seem counter to the long‐term goal of BDA‐induced aggradation, short‐term net erosion is consistent with high precipitation during the study and with theoretical channel evolution models of beaver‐related stream restoration that predict initial channel widening and erosion before net deposition. To better understand the impacts of BDAs on channel morphology and restoration efforts in the western United States, it is imperative that we consistently assess the effects of beaver‐inspired restoration projects across a range of hydrologic and geomorphic settings and that we continue this monitoring in the future.more » « less
-
Channel incision degrades ecosystems by lowering water tables and disconnecting floodplains. Stream restoration often aims to reverse these impacts. However, projects typically receive minimal monitoring, and treatment effectiveness has not been validated. We used trait‐based analysis to evaluate whether two stream restoration techniques—beaver dam analogs (BDAs) and plug‐and‐ponds—raised water tables and increased overbank flooding, whether these altered environmental filters facilitated recovery of riparian plant communities, and how reassembly impacted the representation of traits that influence ecosystem function. We report on a before‐after‐control‐impact study and Bayesian analysis that estimated the probability that treatments affected riparian plant functional diversity and composition. We found a high probability (0.99 and 0.97, respectively) that BDAs decreased functional dispersion by ≥50% and plug‐and‐ponds decreased dispersion by ≥30%. Both treatments increased the relative abundance of high moisture use plants, wetland plants, and plants with high anaerobic tolerance. For example, BDAs increased the relative abundance of obligate wetland plants by 100%, and plug‐and‐ponds increased the relative abundance of facultative wetland plants by 105%, on average. These results suggest treatments modified environmental filters and recovered riparian plant communities. Ecosystem function was likely altered as the streamside plant community reassembled. Small increases in functional divergence suggest both treatments increased resource use efficiency, and we found a high probability of small treatment effect sizes (<20%) related to changes in community‐level C:N and nitrogen fixation. Our results demonstrate trait‐based analysis can detect a rapid response to restoration and offer a cost‐effective monitoring approach to compare treatments across space and time.more » « less
-
Abstract Restoration aims to reverse the global declines of foundation species, but it is unclear how project attributes, the physical setting, and antecedent conditions affect restoration success. In coastal seas worldwide, oyster reef restoration is increasing to counter historical habitat destruction and associated declines in fisheries production and biodiversity. Yet, restoration outcomes are highly variable and the factors that enhance oyster production and nekton abundance and diversity on restored reefs are unresolved. To quantify the drivers of oyster restoration success, we used meta‐analysis to synthesize data from 158 restored reefs paired with unstructured habitats along the United States Gulf and Atlantic coasts. The average recovery of oyster production was 65% greater in subtidal (vs. intertidal) zones, 173% greater in polyhaline (vs. mesohaline) environments and increased with tidal range, demonstrating that physical conditions can strongly influence the restoration success of foundation species. Additionally, restoration increased the relative abundance and richness of nektonic fishes and invertebrates over time as reefs aged (at least 8 years post‐construction). Thus, the restoration benefits for provisioning habitat and enhancing biodiversity accrue over time, highlighting that restoration projects need multiple years to maximize ecosystem functions. Furthermore, long‐term monitoring of restored and control sites is needed to assess restoration outcomes and associated drivers. Last, our work reveals data constraints for several potential drivers of restoration outcomes, including reef construction material, reef dimensions, harvest pressure and disease prevalence. More experimental and observational studies are needed to target these factors and measure them with consistent methods across studies. Our findings indicate that the assisted recovery of foundation species yields several enhancements to ecosystem services, but such benefits are mediated by time and environmental conditions.more » « less
-
Abstract Active restoration often aims to accelerate ecosystem recovery. However, active restoration may not be worthwhile if its effects are overwhelmed by changes that occur passively. Moreover, it can be challenging to separate the effects of passive processes, such as dispersal and natural succession, from active restoration efforts.We assess the 24‐year impact of actively restoring a Minnesota old‐field grassland via seed addition of native tallgrass prairie species. We compared the abundance of four functional plant groups in actively restored plots against abundances in three reference classes: (1) unrestored plots undergoing passive recovery within the same old field, (2) passively recovering plots in two nearby old fields of similar age and (3) a chronosequence of 21 old fields within the same landscape.Active restoration led to a higher abundance of native grasses and forbs in the 36 m2treatment plots. Seed addition was more effective if the original vegetation was first removed using herbicide, burning and tilling. However, long‐term conclusions about the efficacy of active restoration varied widely depending on the choice of reference class.In our small‐scale restoration experiment, native abundance was similarly high in both the actively restored and reference plots after 24 years, suggesting either (1) passive recovery or (2) local dispersal of native species from nearby treatment plots (i.e. cross‐contamination). In contrast, a comparison with two nearby reference fields suggested active restoration resulted in much higher native abundance relative to passive recovery. A smaller, positive effect was detected when we compared actively restored plots to the chronosequence of old fields. In the chronosequence, many passively recovering old fields had transitioned to native grass dominance naturally, although active restoration appeared to increase native forb abundance.Synthesis and applications: Our findings highlight the importance of using scale‐appropriate references for assessing the efficacy and need for active restoration. Comparing actively restored plots with the surrounding landscape, we found that active restoration and passive recovery led to similar plant communities after 24 years. Because local dispersal from actively restored sites can nearby references, caution should be exercised when evaluating long‐term restoration projects using only small‐scale experiments.more » « less
