skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Recovery of Energy and Carbon Dioxide from Craft Brewery Wastes for Onsite Use
Interest in craft beers is increasing worldwide due to their flavor and variety. However, craft breweries have high water, energy, and carbon dioxide (CO2) demands and generate large quantities of high-strength waste and greenhouse gases. While many large breweries recover energy using anaerobic digestion (AD) and recapture CO2 from beer fermentation, little is known about the economic feasibility of applying these technologies at the scale of small craft breweries. In addition, compounds in hops (Humulus lupulus), which are commonly added to craft beer to provide a bitter or “hoppy” flavor, have been shown to adversely affect anaerobic microbes in ruminant studies. In this study, biochemical methane potential (BMP) assays and anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (ASBR) studies were used to investigate biomethane production from high-strength craft brewery waste, with and without hop addition. A spreadsheet tool was developed to evaluate the economic feasibility of bioenergy and CO2 recovery depending on the brewery’s location, production volume, waste management, CO2 requirement, energy costs, and hop waste addition. The results showed that co-digestion of yeast waste with 20% hops (based on chemical oxygen demand (COD)) resulted in slightly lower methane yields compared with mono-digestion of yeast; however, it did not significantly impact the economic feasibility of AD in craft breweries. The use of AD and CO2 recovery was found to be economically feasible if the brewery’s annual beer production is >50,000 barrels/year.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1930451
PAR ID:
10465437
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Fermentation
Volume:
9
Issue:
9
ISSN:
2311-5637
Page Range / eLocation ID:
831
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; (, Sustainability)
    Small-scale anaerobic digestion (AD) can be an effective organic waste management system that also provides energy for small businesses and rural communities. This study measured fuel production from digestions of single and mixed feedstocks using an unheated, 2 m3 digester operated continuously in a temperate climate for over three years. Using local food waste, brewery waste, grease waste, and agricultural residues, this study determined that small-scale AD co-digestions were almost always higher yielding than single feedstocks during psychrophilic operation and seasonal temperature transitions. Agricultural residues from Miscanthus x giganteus had the greatest impact on biomethane production during co-digestion (4.7-fold greater average biogas %CH4), while mesophilic digestion of brewery waste alone produced the most biogas (0.76 gCH4 gVS−1 d−1). Biogas production during the transition from mesophilic to psychrophilic was temporarily maintained at levels similar to mesophilic digestions, particularly during co-digestions, but biogas quality declined during these temperature shifts. Full-time operation of small-scale, unheated AD systems could be feasible in temperate climates if feedstock is intentionally amended to stabilize carbon content. 
    more » « less
  2. ; (, Energies)
    Among the sustainable initiatives for renewable energy technologies, anaerobic digestion (AD) is a potential contender to replace fossil fuels. The anaerobic co-digestions of goat manure (GM) with sorghum (SG), cotton gin trash (CGT), and food waste (FW) having different mixing ratios, volumes, temperatures, and additives were optimized in single and two-stage bioreactors. The biochemical methane potential assays (having different mixing ratios of double and triple substrates) were run in 250 mL serum bottles in triplicates. The best-yielding ratio was up-scaled to fabricated 2 L bioreactors. The biodegradability, biomethane recovery, and process efficacy are discussed. The co-digestion of GM with SG in a 70:30 ratio yielded the highest biomethane of 239.3 ± 15.6 mL/gvs, and it was further up-scaled to a two-stage temperature-phased process supplemented with an anaerobic medium and fly ash (FA) in fabricated 2 L bioreactors. This system yielded the highest biomethane of 266.0 mL/gvs, having an anaerobic biodegradability of 67.3% in 70:30 GM:SG co-digestion supplemented with an anaerobic medium. The BMP of the FA-amended treatment may be lower because of its high Ca concentration of 205.74 ± 3.6. The liquid fraction of the effluents can be applied as N and P fertigation. The Ca concentration was found to be 24.3, 25.1, and 6.3 g/kg in GM and GM:SG (TS) and SG solid fractions, respectively, whereas K was found to be 26.6, 10.8, and 7.4 g/kg. The carbon to nitrogen ratio of solid fraction varied between 2.0 and 24.8 for return to the soils to enhance its quality. This study involving feedstock acquisition, characterization, and their anaerobic digestion optimization provides comprehensive information and may assist small farmers operating on-farm anaerobic digesters. 
    more » « less
  3. (, Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy)
    The number of craft breweries and the volume of beer they produce continue to increase in the United States. Small entrepreneurial craft brewery businesses produce limited quantities of specialty beer, also known as craft beer. As of 2018 the state of Montana had the second most craft breweries per capita in the United States. In addition to competitive industry forces, legal and environmental forces are two of the most salient concerns for craft brewery businesses in Montana and throughout the United States. A case study about Montana Hop Brew, a Montana-based craft brewery, is presented. The case highlights the entrepreneurial nature of small craft breweries and describes competitive industry, legal, and environmental forces that Montana Hop Brew faces. Teaching notes complete with learning objectives, required and supplemental readings, a student exercise, and discussion questions are available to assist with delivering the case. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; (, Energies)
    Food waste (FW), a major part of the US waste stream, causes greenhouse gases within landfills, but there is an opportunity to divert FW to anaerobic digestion (AD) facilities that produce biogas and digestate fertilizer. The composition of FW inputs to AD determines the value of these products. This study provides insight into the effect of waste composition on the quality of AD products by first characterizing the biogas and digestate quality of anaerobically digested FW from four diets (paleolithic, ketogenic, vegetarian, and omnivorous), and then estimating the difference in biogas produced from codigested FW and brewery waste (BW). Waste feedstock mixtures were incubated in lab-scale bioreactors for 21 days with live inoculum. Biogas quality was monitored for 21–30 days in four trials. Samples were analyzed using a gas chromatograph for detection of methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2). The composition of the waste inputs had a significant impact on the quality of biogas but not on the quality of the digestate, which has implications for the value of post-AD fertilizer products. Wastes with higher proportions of proteins and fats enhanced biogas quality, unlike wastes that were rich in soluble carbohydrates. Codigestion of omnivorous food waste with carbon-rich agricultural wastes (AW) improved biogas quality, but biogas produced from BW does not necessarily improve with increasing amounts of AW in codigestion. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; (, Water Environment Research)
    Abstract Hydrothermal treatment (HT) is a promising technology to enhance anaerobic digestion (AD) of municipal sludge. However, the capacity of pre‐ and inter‐stage HT (i.e., HT‐AD and AD‐HT‐AD, respectively) to enhance the digestibility of municipal sludge has not been sufficiently explored. This study compared the efficacy of pre‐ and inter‐stage HT performed from 90 to 185°C to enhance methane production from a mixture of primary sludge and waste activated sludge using mesophilic (35°C) biochemical methane potential tests. In both configurations, sludge solubilization increased with HT temperature. HT‐AD, and to a greater extent AD‐HT‐AD, increased the release of ammonium nitrogen. Even though HT at 185°C dramatically increased sludge solubilization, the overall specific methane yield with HT at 185°C was lower than or comparable to that at lower HT temperatures in the HT‐AD and AD‐HT‐AD configurations, respectively. Up to 155°C HT, the overall specific methane yield with the HT‐AD configuration was higher by 4.9%–8.3% compared to the AD‐HT‐AD configuration. However, when the HT energy was considered, compared to the control (i.e., AD of sludge without HT), the net energy gain (ΔE) decreased as the HT temperature increased, becoming negative at an HT of 185°C. The AD‐HT‐AD configuration resulted in a higher overall volatile solids destruction (by 8.1 to 20.1%). In conclusion, for municipal sludge with a relatively high ultimate digestibility, as was the case in this study, HT‐AD is preferable as it has a smaller footprint and is easier to operate than the AD‐HT‐AD configuration. However, given the significantly higher volatile solids destruction in the AD‐HT‐AD configuration, compared to the HT‐AD configuration, AD‐HT‐AD may be more beneficial considering post‐AD sludge handling processes. Practitioner pointsHydrothermal treatment (HT) increased the rate and extent of methane production from municipal sludge mixture.155°C was the optimal temperature for either pre‐ or inter‐stage HT to increase biogas production.Pre‐ and inter‐stage HT resulted in comparable ultimate methane production.Pre‐stage HT is preferable to inter‐stage HT (smaller footprint, easier to operate).AD‐HT‐AD resulted in significantly higher volatile solids destruction compared to the HT‐AD configuration. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email