skip to main content


Title: Use of pupil-difference moments for predicting optical performance impacts of generalized mid-spatial frequency surface errors

In this work, we present a methodology for predicting the optical performance impacts of random and structured MSF surface errors using pupil-difference probability distribution (PDPD) moments. In addition, we show that, for random mid-spatial frequency (MSF) surface errors, performance estimates from the PDPD moments converge to performance estimates that assume random statistics. Finally, we apply these methods to several MSF surface errors with different distributions and compare estimated optical performance values to predictions based on earlier methods assuming random error distributions.

 
more » « less
NSF-PAR ID:
10469003
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Publisher / Repository:
Optical Society of America
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Optics Express
Volume:
31
Issue:
22
ISSN:
1094-4087; OPEXFF
Format(s):
Medium: X Size: Article No. 36337
Size(s):
["Article No. 36337"]
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Standard surface specifications for mid-spatial frequency (MSF) errors do not capture complex surface topography and often lose critical information by making simplifying assumptions about surface distribution and statistics. As a result, it is challenging to link surface specifications with optical performance. In this work, we present use of the pupil-difference probability distribution (PDPD) moments to assess general MSF surface errors and show how the PDPD moments relate to the relative modulation.

     
    more » « less
  2. We propose a workflow for modeling generalized mid-spatial frequency (MSF) errors in optical imaging systems. This workflow enables the classification of MSF distributions, filtering of bandlimited signatures, propagation of MSF errors to the exit pupil, and performance predictions that differentiate performance impacts due to the MSF distributions. We demonstrate the workflow by modeling the performance impacts of MSF errors for both transmissive and reflective imaging systems with near-diffraction-limited performance.

     
    more » « less
  3. Abstract

    Estimating phenotypic distributions of populations and communities is central to many questions in ecology and evolution. These distributions can be characterized by their moments (mean, variance, skewness and kurtosis) or diversity metrics (e.g. functional richness). Typically, such moments and metrics are calculated using community‐weighted approaches (e.g. abundance‐weighted mean). We propose an alternative bootstrapping approach that allows flexibility in trait sampling and explicit incorporation of intraspecific variation, and show that this approach significantly improves estimation while allowing us to quantify uncertainty.

    We assess the performance of different approaches for estimating the moments of trait distributions across various sampling scenarios, taxa and datasets by comparing estimates derived from simulated samples with the true values calculated from full datasets. Simulations differ in sampling intensity (individuals per species), sampling biases (abundance, size), trait data source (local vs. global) and estimation method (two types of community‐weighting, two types of bootstrapping).

    We introduce thetraitstrapR package, which contains a modular and extensible set of bootstrapping and weighted‐averaging functions that use community composition and trait data to estimate the moments of community trait distributions with their uncertainty. Importantly, the first function in the workflow,trait_fill, allows the user to specify hierarchical structures (e.g. plot within site, experiment vs. control, species within genus) to assign trait values to each taxon in each community sample.

    Across all taxa, simulations and metrics, bootstrapping approaches were more accurate and less biased than community‐weighted approaches. With bootstrapping, a sample size of 9 or more measurements per species per trait generally included the true mean within the 95% CI. It reduced average percent errors by 26%–74% relative to community‐weighting. Random sampling across all species outperformed both size‐ and abundance‐biased sampling.

    Our results suggest randomly sampling ~9 individuals per sampling unit and species, covering all species in the community and analysing the data using nonparametric bootstrapping generally enable reliable inference on trait distributions, including the central moments, of communities. By providing better estimates of community trait distributions, bootstrapping approaches can improve our ability to link traits to both the processes that generate them and their effects on ecosystems.

     
    more » « less
  4. Mid-spatial frequency (MSF) errors impact optical performance. Conventional surface specification methods assume isotropy, which gives misleading results for surfaces with anisotropic errors. We propose an alternate surface specification method. © 2019 The Author(s) OCIS codes: (120.0120) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology; (220.0220) Optical design and fabrication. 
    more » « less
  5. Specification and tolerancing of surfaces with mid-spatial frequency (MSF) errors are challenging and require new tools to augment simple surface statistics to better represent the structured characteristics of these errors. A novel surface specification method is developed by considering the structured and anisotropic nature of MSF errors and their impact on the modulation transfer function (MTF). The result is an intuitive plot of bandlimited RMS error values in polar coordinates which contains the surface error anisotropy information and enables an easy to understand acceptance criterion. Methods, application examples, and the connection of this surface specification approach to the MTF are discussed. © 2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement 
    more » « less