In this work, we present a methodology for predicting the optical performance impacts of random and structured MSF surface errors using pupil-difference probability distribution (PDPD) moments. In addition, we show that, for random mid-spatial frequency (MSF) surface errors, performance estimates from the PDPD moments converge to performance estimates that assume random statistics. Finally, we apply these methods to several MSF surface errors with different distributions and compare estimated optical performance values to predictions based on earlier methods assuming random error distributions.
Pupil-difference moments for estimating relative modulation from general mid-spatial frequency surface errors
Standard surface specifications for mid-spatial frequency (MSF) errors do not capture complex surface topography and often lose critical information by making simplifying assumptions about surface distribution and statistics. As a result, it is challenging to link surface specifications with optical performance. In this work, we present use of the pupil-difference probability distribution (PDPD) moments to assess general MSF surface errors and show how the PDPD moments relate to the relative modulation.
more » « less- PAR ID:
- 10410499
- Publisher / Repository:
- Optical Society of America
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Optics Letters
- Volume:
- 48
- Issue:
- 9
- ISSN:
- 0146-9592; OPLEDP
- Format(s):
- Medium: X Size: Article No. 2492
- Size(s):
- Article No. 2492
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
-
more » « less
We propose a workflow for modeling generalized mid-spatial frequency (MSF) errors in optical imaging systems. This workflow enables the classification of MSF distributions, filtering of bandlimited signatures, propagation of MSF errors to the exit pupil, and performance predictions that differentiate performance impacts due to the MSF distributions. We demonstrate the workflow by modeling the performance impacts of MSF errors for both transmissive and reflective imaging systems with near-diffraction-limited performance.
-
Specification and tolerancing of surfaces with mid-spatial frequency (MSF) errors are challenging and require new tools to augment simple surface statistics to better represent the structured characteristics of these errors. A novel surface specification method is developed by considering the structured and anisotropic nature of MSF errors and their impact on the modulation transfer function (MTF). The result is an intuitive plot of bandlimited RMS error values in polar coordinates which contains the surface error anisotropy information and enables an easy to understand acceptance criterion. Methods, application examples, and the connection of this surface specification approach to the MTF are discussed. © 2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreementmore » « less
-
Mid-spatial frequency (MSF) errors impact optical performance. Conventional surface specification methods assume isotropy, which gives misleading results for surfaces with anisotropic errors. We propose an alternate surface specification method. © 2019 The Author(s) OCIS codes: (120.0120) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology; (220.0220) Optical design and fabrication.more » « less
-
more » « less
ABSTRACT Weak gravitational lensing is one of the most powerful tools for cosmology, while subject to challenges in quantifying subtle systematic biases. The point spread function (PSF) can cause biases in weak lensing shear inference when the PSF model does not match the true PSF that is convolved with the galaxy light profile. Although the effect of PSF size and shape errors – i.e. errors in second moments – is well studied, weak lensing systematics associated with errors in higher moments of the PSF model require further investigation. The goal of our study is to estimate their potential impact for LSST weak lensing analysis. We go beyond second moments of the PSF by using image simulations to relate multiplicative bias in shear to errors in the higher moments of the PSF model. We find that the current level of errors in higher moments of the PSF model in data from the Hyper Suprime-Cam survey can induce a ∼0.05 per cent shear bias, making this effect unimportant for ongoing surveys but relevant at the precision of upcoming surveys such as LSST.
