An official website of the United States government
In the Continuous Steiner Tree problem (CST), we are given as input a set of points (called terminals) in a metric space and ask for the minimum-cost tree connecting them. Additional points (called Steiner points) from the metric space can be introduced as nodes in the solution. In the Discrete Steiner Tree problem (DST), we are given in addition to the terminals, a set of facilities, and any solution tree connecting the terminals can only contain the Steiner points from this set of facilities. Trevisan [SICOMP'00] showed that CST and DST are APX-hard when the input lies in the $$\ell_1$$-metric (and Hamming metric). Chleb\'ik and Chleb\'ikov\'a [TCS'08] showed that DST is NP-hard to approximate to factor of $$96/95\approx 1.01$$ in the graph metric (and consequently $$\ell_\infty$$-metric). Prior to this work, it was unclear if CST and DST are APX-hard in essentially every other popular metric. In this work, we prove that DST is APX-hard in every $$\ell_p$$-metric. We also prove that CST is APX-hard in the $$\ell_{\infty}$$-metric. Finally, we relate CST and DST, showing a general reduction from CST to DST in $$\ell_p$$-metrics. Comment: Abstract shortened. Journal version for TheoretiCS
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on January 1, 2026
On Steiner Trees of the regular simplex
In the Euclidean Steiner Tree problem, we are given as input a set of points (called terminals) in the $$\ell_2$$-metric space and the goal is to find the minimum-cost tree connecting them. Additional points (called Steiner points) from the space can be introduced as nodes in the solution. The seminal works of Arora [JACM'98] and Mitchell [SICOMP'99] provide a Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme (PTAS) for solving the Euclidean Steiner Tree problem in fixed dimensions. However, the problem remains poorly understood in higher dimensions (such as when the dimension is logarithmic in the number of terminals) and ruling out a PTAS for the problem in high dimensions is a notoriously long standing open problem (for example, see Trevisan [SICOMP'00]). Moreover, the explicit construction of optimal Steiner trees remains unknown for almost all well-studied high-dimensional point configurations. Furthermore, a vast majority the state-of-the-art structural results on (high-dimensional) Euclidean Steiner trees were established in the 1960s, with no noteworthy update in over half a century. In this paper, we revisit high-dimensional Euclidean Steiner trees, proving new structural results. We also establish a link between the computational hardness of the Euclidean Steiner Tree problem and understanding the optimal Steiner trees of regular simplices (and simplicial complexes), proposing several conjectures and showing that some of them suffice to resolve the status of the inapproximability of the Euclidean Steiner Tree problem. Motivated by this connection, we investigate optimal Steiner trees of regular simplices, proving new structural properties of their optimal Steiner trees, revisiting an old conjecture of Smith [Algorithmica'92] about their optimal topology, and providing the first explicit, general construction of candidate optimal Steiner trees for that topology.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2150186
- PAR ID:
- 10492826
- Publisher / Repository:
- Journal of Computational Geometry
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of computational geometry
- Volume:
- 16
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 1920-180X
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Right(s):
- Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Mulzer, Wolfgang; Phillips, Jeff M (Ed.)A (1+e)-stretch tree cover of a metric space is a collection of trees, where every pair of points has a (1+e)-stretch path in one of the trees. The celebrated Dumbbell Theorem [Arya et al. STOC'95] states that any set of n points in d-dimensional Euclidean space admits a (1+e)-stretch tree cover with O_d(e^{-d} ⋅ log(1/e)) trees, where the O_d notation suppresses terms that depend solely on the dimension d. The running time of their construction is O_d(n log n ⋅ log(1/e)/e^d + n ⋅ e^{-2d}). Since the same point may occur in multiple levels of the tree, the maximum degree of a point in the tree cover may be as large as Ω(log Φ), where Φ is the aspect ratio of the input point set. In this work we present a (1+e)-stretch tree cover with O_d(e^{-d+1} ⋅ log(1/e)) trees, which is optimal (up to the log(1/e) factor). Moreover, the maximum degree of points in any tree is an absolute constant for any d. As a direct corollary, we obtain an optimal {routing scheme} in low-dimensional Euclidean spaces. We also present a (1+e)-stretch Steiner tree cover (that may use Steiner points) with O_d(e^{(-d+1)/2} ⋅ log(1/e)) trees, which too is optimal. The running time of our two constructions is linear in the number of edges in the respective tree covers, ignoring an additive O_d(n log n) term; this improves over the running time underlying the Dumbbell Theorem.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Lightness is a fundamental parameter for Euclidean spanners; it is the ratio of the spanner weight to the weight of the minimum spanning tree of a finite set of points in ℝ^d. In a recent breakthrough, Le and Solomon (2019) established the precise dependencies on ε > 0 and d ∈ ℕ of the minimum lightness of a (1+ε)-spanner, and observed that additional Steiner points can substantially improve the lightness. Le and Solomon (2020) constructed Steiner (1+ε)-spanners of lightness O(ε^{-1}logΔ) in the plane, where Δ ≥ Ω(√n) is the spread of the point set, defined as the ratio between the maximum and minimum distance between a pair of points. They also constructed spanners of lightness Õ(ε^{-(d+1)/2}) in dimensions d ≥ 3. Recently, Bhore and Tóth (2020) established a lower bound of Ω(ε^{-d/2}) for the lightness of Steiner (1+ε)-spanners in ℝ^d, for d ≥ 2. The central open problem in this area is to close the gap between the lower and upper bounds in all dimensions d ≥ 2. In this work, we show that for every finite set of points in the plane and every ε > 0, there exists a Euclidean Steiner (1+ε)-spanner of lightness O(ε^{-1}); this matches the lower bound for d = 2. We generalize the notion of shallow light trees, which may be of independent interest, and use directional spanners and a modified window partitioning scheme to achieve a tight weight analysis.more » « less
-
Bahoo, Yeganeh; Georgiou, Konstantinos (Ed.)In this work we consider the Steiner tree problem under Bilu-Linial stability. We give strong geometric struc- tural properties that need to be satisfied by stable in- stances. We then make use of, and strengthen, these geometric properties to show that 1.59-stable instances of Euclidean Steiner trees are polynomial-time solvable by showing it reduces to the minimum spanning tree problem. We also provide a connection between certain approximation algorithms and Bilu-Linial stability for Steiner trees.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)In the classical Steiner tree problem, given an undirected, connected graph G =( V , E ) with non-negative edge costs and a set of terminals T ⊆ V , the objective is to find a minimum-cost tree E &prime ⊆ E that spans the terminals. The problem is APX-hard; the best-known approximation algorithm has a ratio of ρ = ln (4)+ε < 1.39. In this article, we study a natural generalization, the multi-level Steiner tree (MLST) problem: Given a nested sequence of terminals T ℓ ⊂ … ⊂ T 1 ⊆ V , compute nested trees E ℓ ⊆ … ⊆ E 1 ⊆ E that span the corresponding terminal sets with minimum total cost. The MLST problem and variants thereof have been studied under various names, including Multi-level Network Design, Quality-of-Service Multicast tree, Grade-of-Service Steiner tree, and Multi-tier tree. Several approximation results are known. We first present two simple O (ℓ)-approximation heuristics. Based on these, we introduce a rudimentary composite algorithm that generalizes the above heuristics, and determine its approximation ratio by solving a linear program. We then present a method that guarantees the same approximation ratio using at most 2ℓ Steiner tree computations. We compare these heuristics experimentally on various instances of up to 500 vertices using three different network generation models. We also present several integer linear programming formulations for the MLST problem and compare their running times on these instances. To our knowledge, the composite algorithm achieves the best approximation ratio for up to ℓ = 100 levels, which is sufficient for most applications, such as network visualization or designing multi-level infrastructure.more » « less
